Hi all, We are currently testing Xen in a IPv6 environment and noticed that xend does not support migration (and probably other xend services too) for IPv6 setups. As far as I see this is the case for xen 3.4 and 4.0. Is there any plans to add IPv6 support in the future? Thanks very much, Manuel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Hi all, We are currently testing Xen in a IPv6 environment and noticed that xend does not support migration (and probably other xend services too) for IPv6 setups. As far as I see this is the case for xen 3.4 and 4.0. Is there any plans to add IPv6 support in the future? Thanks very much, Manuel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:40:02PM +0200, Manuel Franceschini wrote:> Hi all, > > We are currently testing Xen in a IPv6 environment and noticed that > xend does not support migration (and probably other xend services too) > for IPv6 setups. As far as I see this is the case for xen 3.4 and 4.0. > Is there any plans to add IPv6 support in the future? >I guess the "big plan" is to replace xend with libxenlight/xl, so maybe ipv6 should be introduced to the new tools. I don''t know how big effort it would be to fix xend for ipv6. -- Pasi _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Pasi Kärkkäinen writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xend IPv6 support"):> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:40:02PM +0200, Manuel Franceschini wrote: > > We are currently testing Xen in a IPv6 environment and noticed that > > xend does not support migration (and probably other xend services too) > > for IPv6 setups. As far as I see this is the case for xen 3.4 and 4.0. > > Is there any plans to add IPv6 support in the future? > > I guess the "big plan" is to replace xend with libxenlight/xl, > so maybe ipv6 should be introduced to the new tools.xl/libxl do not do the socket handling for migration themselves: they leave that to the caller. In the case of xl the default arrangement is to do the migration over ssh (which has the added benefits of encryption and in many cases lack of management overhead). If and when xl supports a dedicated port (with daemonic listener) and migration over raw sockets done by xl or libxl itself, it should certainly be written to support both v4 and v6. So the short answer is that xl already supports IPv6 for migration if your ssh and sshd do. But we probably need to extend the vif protocol to permit specification of v6 addresses through xenstore ? Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Reasonably Related Threads
- [PATCH] Fix pci passthru in xend interface used by libvirt
- (Xen + libvirt) Installing and workin with xen -4.2.1 and libvirt 1.1.2
- (Xen + libvirt) Installing and workin with xen -4.2.1 and libvirt 1.1.2
- Error : libxenlight state driver is not active
- How to use xl (in place of xm) with libvirt 1.0.2 and Xen 4.2.1 in Ubuntu 13.04?