Dan Magenheimer
2010-Aug-13 14:44 UTC
[Xen-devel] hg changeset numbers vs hashes and the "public" xen http-hg trees
I''ve started to notice developers making more use of the 48-bit "hash" (forgot the proper term) identifier for changesets instead of changeset number. While I understand the reasons (specifically that the 48-bit has is unique across all trees but the changeset number is not... and that more developers are experienced now with git where the hash is exclusively used), sadly the "public" http representation of Xen trees available through: http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg and friends which I browse regularly does not allow searching by hash, so a cset comment such as: "tools/python: Remove non-ASCII characters introduced by fffedd3d70e1." is rather useless when using the http interface. Is it possible that an update to the xensource hg-http server might solve this problem? Alternately, maybe it might be time to switch from mercurial to git? :-) (start another thread to comment on that please) Thanks, Dan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Tim Deegan
2010-Aug-13 14:51 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] hg changeset numbers vs hashes and the "public" xen http-hg trees
At 15:44 +0100 on 13 Aug (1281714259), Dan Magenheimer wrote:> I''ve started to notice developers making more use > of the 48-bit "hash" (forgot the proper term) identifier > for changesets instead of changeset number. While > I understand the reasons (specifically that the > 48-bit has is unique across all trees but the changeset > number is not... and that more developers are experienced > now with git where the hash is exclusively used), sadly > the "public" http representation of Xen trees available > through: > > http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg and friends > > which I browse regularly does not allow searching by hash, > so a cset comment such as: > > "tools/python: Remove non-ASCII characters introduced by fffedd3d70e1." > > is rather useless when using the http interface.Works for me[tm]. I just entered fffedd3d70e1 in the search box and it took me to that place in the log. Cheers, Tim. -- Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com> Principal Software Engineer, XenServer Engineering Citrix Systems UK Ltd. (Company #02937203, SL9 0BG) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Ian Campbell
2010-Aug-13 14:56 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] hg changeset numbers vs hashes and the "public" xen http-hg trees
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 15:44 +0100, Dan Magenheimer wrote:> I''ve started to notice developers making more use > of the 48-bit "hash" (forgot the proper term) identifier > for changesets instead of changeset number. While > I understand the reasons (specifically that the > 48-bit has is unique across all trees but the changeset > number is not... and that more developers are experienced > now with git where the hash is exclusively used), sadly > the "public" http representation of Xen trees available > through: > > http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg and friends > > which I browse regularly does not allow searching by hash, > so a cset comment such as: > > "tools/python: Remove non-ASCII characters introduced by fffedd3d70e1." > > is rather useless when using the http interface.Typing "fffedd3d70e1" in the search box at http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg takes me to http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg?rev=fffedd3d70e1 which has 21967:fffedd3d70e1 as the first listed entry and as far as I know this has always worked for me (I use it all the time). It might be one click extra than you were expecting but it is certainly there. Even if not then clicking on the first entry on http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg then editing the URL to change the hash is not that hard. In fact if you use it regularly then an alias can usually be setup in most browsers to take you straight to the relevant page if you type e.g. "xen fffedd3d70e1" in the address bar. Note that the cset number is not stable even within http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg -- if a merge changeset is pushed to this tree I believe it is possible that changesets already their could change their numbers. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Dan Magenheimer
2010-Aug-13 15:02 UTC
RE: [Xen-devel] hg changeset numbers vs hashes and the "public" xen http-hg trees
> > "tools/python: Remove non-ASCII characters introduced by > fffedd3d70e1." > > > > is rather useless when using the http interface. > > Works for me[tm]. I just entered fffedd3d70e1 in the search box and it > took me to that place in the log.Oops, sorry for the noise. It now works for me also. It failed when I tried it before I sent the message, possibly due to a network hiccup (I''m on the road). _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel