Can be found at: http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.4-testing.hg (tagged 3.4.1-rc10) With a view to getting 3.3.2 and 3.4.1 released early next week, I will only consider patches for serious regressions in the 3.3 and 3.4 branches. This firmly closes the door on nice-to-have backports from the development branch. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
I believe backport CS 19889 libfsimage: Support for zfs version 16 makes sense.
SNV_117 already utilize ZFS v.16 for it''s image.
I have to do it manually every time to test Nevada DomUs at Xen 3.4.1 Dom0.
Pygrub in Xen 3.5 Unstable fails to find kernel for either Solaris or Linux ISO
images.
Boris.
P.S. Sorry , if it''s too late.
--- On Wed, 7/29/09, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: [Xen-devel] New release candidate for 3.4.1
To: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com"
<xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Date: Wednesday, July 29, 2009, 4:28 AM
Can be found at:
http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.4-testing.hg (tagged 3.4.1-rc10)
With a view to getting 3.3.2 and 3.4.1 released early next week, I will only
consider patches for serious regressions in the 3.3 and 3.4 branches. This
firmly closes the door on nice-to-have backports from the development
branch.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:38:48AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:> I believe backport CS 19889 libfsimage: Support for zfs version 16 makes sense. > SNV_117 already utilize ZFS v.16 for it''s image.Agreed. It''s not a regression as such but it does make recent Solaris unusable on Linux. It''s also very self-contained (can only break ZFS) regards john _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On 29/07/2009 13:49, "John Levon" <levon@movementarian.org> wrote:> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:38:48AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > >> I believe backport CS 19889 libfsimage: Support for zfs version 16 makes >> sense. >> SNV_117 already utilize ZFS v.16 for it''s image. > > Agreed. It''s not a regression as such but it does make recent Solaris > unusable on Linux. It''s also very self-contained (can only break ZFS)I''ll add that into just 3.4 branch without a new rc tag. Sound okay? -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 02:06:03PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:> >> I believe backport CS 19889 libfsimage: Support for zfs version 16 makes > >> sense. > >> SNV_117 already utilize ZFS v.16 for it''s image. > > > > Agreed. It''s not a regression as such but it does make recent Solaris > > unusable on Linux. It''s also very self-contained (can only break ZFS) > > I''ll add that into just 3.4 branch without a new rc tag. Sound okay?That''d be great. thanks john _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Thank you. Boris --- On Wed, 7/29/09, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> wrote: From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] New release candidate for 3.4.1 To: "John Levon" <levon@movementarian.org>, "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> Date: Wednesday, July 29, 2009, 9:06 AM On 29/07/2009 13:49, "John Levon" <levon@movementarian.org> wrote:> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:38:48AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > >> I believe backport CS 19889 libfsimage: Support for zfs version 16 makes >> sense. >> SNV_117 already utilize ZFS v.16 for it''s image. > > Agreed. It''s not a regression as such but it does make recent Solaris > unusable on Linux. It''s also very self-contained (can only break ZFS)I''ll add that into just 3.4 branch without a new rc tag. Sound okay? -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel