Jan Beulich
2007-Oct-24 14:15 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH, fixed] linux/x86: use sysenter/syscall for 32-bit apps on 64-bit Xen
>>However, in case (2) the i386 guest kernel unconditionally goes for >>sysenter, and the hypervisor will accept this because CPUID has advertised >>SEP. *But* AMD CPUs do not support sysenter except in legacy mode! The >>correct thing to do is to use syscall. The hypervisor 32-on-64 compat code >>would accept CALLBACKTYPE_syscall, but the Linux i386 code here doesn''t >>appear to make use of it. So I would imagine that the i386 kernel running on >>AMD hardware would cause all user processes to crash when they SYSENTER. > >I intentionally avoided adding syscall stuff to the 32-bit kernel, since that isn''t >there in the native kernel either (as it''s not really usable on native). Therefore >I''d suggest clearing SEP for pv32-on-64 guests in emulate_forced_invalid_op()... on AMD CPUs I meant to say. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [PATCH] x86-64: syscall/sysenter support for 32-bit apps
- 32-on-64 sysenter for pvops
- [PATCH] x86-64: drop updating of UREGS_rip when converting sysenter to #GP
- [PATCH 1/10] I386 sysenter arch pages fix.patch
- [PATCH 1/10] I386 sysenter arch pages fix.patch