thr3ads.net - Xen devel - [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 15521

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Zhao, Yunfeng

2007-Jul-13 06:55 UTC

[Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 15521 - 2 new issues

New issues (2)
================================================1) Data corrupted after copied
into a 32bit win2k3 guest on 64bit
hypervisor with rtl8139
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1025
2) pcnet network of 32bit win2k/64bit hypervisor is not stable.
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1026

Fixed issues (1)
================================================1. HVM Live migration fails on
PAE
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1018
It''s a config problem of test machine rather than an issue of xen.

Old issues (3):
================================================1).time latency is a negative
number on window guest when vcpu > 1
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=895
       You can reproduce it on SMP windows, it will not happen on UP
Windows
2) IA32E/PAE: 32bit Vista RTM network doesn''t work.(p1)
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=840
3) PAE dom0  keeps printing "Timer ISR/0: Time went backwards"
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1000


Testing environments 
=============================================PAE	
CPU		Paxville
Chipset 		Intel Harwich
Dom0 OS			Fedora5
Memory size		8G

IA32e	
Dom0 OS			RHEL4u3
CPU		Woodcrest
Chipset 		Intel 5000(Blackford)
Memory size		12G

Details:
=============================================PAE:
+ Build&Boot PAE SMP xen0 without problem
+ Can bootup SMP XenU with  256 M Memory
+ Can bootup unmodified RHEL4U1 IA32 nonPAE SMP 2.6 Linux VMX domain
+ Can bootup unmodified RHEL4U1/RHEL4U2/FC5 PAE SMP 2.6 Linux VMX domain
+ Can bootup RHEL4U1/RHEL4U2/FC5 PAE SMP 2.6 Linux VMX domain & XenU
with different memory size
  (VMX:64MB,128MB,196MB,256MB,512MB,1500MB.XenU:256MB)
+ Can bootup RHEL4U1 PAE SMP Linux VMX domain with base kernel
+ xm-test runs well
+ A selected subset of LTP runs well in RHEL4U2 PAE SMP 2.6 Linux VMX
domain 
+ Can build base kenerl 2.6.16 in RHEL4U1 PAE SMP VMX domain.
+ Can startX in Dom0
+ Can bootup FC5 PAE SMP 2.6 Linux in VMX with acpi enable
+ Network is OK in RHEL4U1/RHEL4U2/FC5 PAE SMP VMX domain
+ Can startX in RHEL4U2 PAE SMP VMX domain
+ Can bootup unmodified IA32 UP nonACPI Windows2K VMX domain 
+ Can bootup unmodified IA32 UP ACPI WindowXP SP2 VMX domain
+ Can bootup unmodified PAE UP ACPI Windows2K3 VMX domain 
+ Can bootup unmodified PAE UP ACPI Windows Beta 2 Vista VMX domain 
+ Can bootup unmodified IA32 SMP Win2K3 VMX domain
+ Can bootup unmodified IA32 SMP WinXP VMX domain
+ Can bootup unmodified IA32 SMP Windows Beta 2 Vista VMX domain
+ Can bootup unmodified PAE SMP Windows RTM Vista VMX domains(network
does not work)   
+ VBD and VNIF work on UP and SMP VMX domain can not work
+ Can not save/restore work
+ Can not Live migration

IA32E: 
+ Build&Boot IA32E SMP xen0 without problem
+ Can bootup SMP XenU with  256 M Memory
+ Can bootup unmodified FC5 IA32 nonPAE SMP 2.6 Linux VMX domain
+ Can bootup unmodified FC5 PAE SMP 2.6 Linux VMX domain
+ Can bootup unmodified FC5/RHEL4U1/RHEL4U3 IA32E SMP 2.6 Linux in VMX
+ Can bootup FC5/RHEL4U1/RHEL4U3 IA32E SMP VMX domain & xenU with
different memory size.
  (VMX:128MB,256MB,384MB,512MB,1024M,4096MB.XenU:256MB)
+ Can bootup four FC5 IA32E SMP Linux VMX domain in sequence
+ xm-test runs well
+ A selected subset of LTP runs well in RHEL4U1 IA32E SMP 2.6 Linux VMX
domain 
+ Can build base kenerl 2.6.16 in RHEL4U1 IA32E SMP VMX domain.
+ Can boot up FC3 Linux VMX domain with base kernel
+ Can startX in Dom0
+ Can bootup FC5 IA32E 2.6 Linux VMX domain with acpi enable
+ Can startX in RHEL4U3 Ia32E SMP VMX domain
+ Network is OK in FC5/RHEL4U1/RHEL4U3 IA32E SMP VMX domain
+ Can bootup unmodified IA32 UP ACPI WindowXP SP2 VMX domain
+ Can bootup unmodified IA32 UP ACPI Windows 2K3 VMX domain   
+ Can bootup unmodified IA32 SMP Win2K3 VMX domain
+ Can bootup unmodified IA32 SMP WinXP VMX domain
+ Can bootup unmodified PAE SMP ACPI Windows Beta 2 Vista VMX domain   
+ Can bootup unmodified PAE SMP ACPI Windows RTM Vista VMX
domain(network does not work)   
+ Can bootup unmodified IA32E UP WinXP VMX domain
+ Can bootup unmodified IA32E UP Win2K3 VMX domain
+ Can bootup unmodified IA32E SMP Win2K3 VMX domain
+ Can bootup unmodified IA32E SMP WinXP VMX domain
+ Can bootup unmodified IA32E SMP Windows Beta 2 Vista VMX domain
+ Can bootup unmodified IA32E SMP Windows RTM Vista VMX domain
+ Can bootup >4G IA32E SMP Window RTM Vista VMX domain
+ Can bootup >4G IA32E SMP Linux VMX domain
+ VBD and VNIF work on UP and SMP VMX domain can not work
+ Can not xm save/restore work
+ Can 32-bits PAE xenU boot on 64-bits xen0
+ Can Live migration 

For details
------------------------------------------------------------
Platform: PAE 
Service OS: FC5, PAE, SMP
Hardware: Conroe
Default guest OS: PAE,SMP, 2.6 kernel
 
1, one xenU domain with memory 256M
PASS
2, one IA32 FC5 nonPAE SMP 2.6 VMX domain with memory 256M	PASS
3, one FC5 PAE SMP Linux VMX domain with memory 512M		PASS
4, one FC5 PAE SMP Linux VMX domain with memory 1500M		PASS
5, one RHEL4u1 Linux VMX domain boot with PAE SMP base kernel(2.6.16)
PASS
6, one FC5 PAE SMP Linux VMX domain with acpi enable		PASS
7, 2 FC5 PAE SMP VMX domains and 2 xenU domains coexist		PASS
9, network in xenu domain
PASS
10, network in RHEL4U1/RHEL4U2/FC5 PAE SMP Linux VMX domain	PASS
11, Startx in RHEL4U2 PAE SMP Linux VMX domain			PASS
12, startx in dom0
PASS
13, xm-test
PASS
14, subset LTP test in RHEL4U2 PAE SMP VMX domain
PASS
15, build Linux 2.6.16 base kernel in RHEL4U1 PAE SMP Linux VMX
domainPASS
16, one IA32 nonACPI Window VMX domain 				PASS
17, IA32 UP nonACPI 2K and XPsp2 Windows VMX domains coexist	 PASS
18, one IA32 UP ACPI Windows 2K VMX domain
PASS
19, one IA32 UP ACPI Windows XP sp2 VMX domain			PASS
20, one IA32 UP ACPI Windows 2K3 VMX domain			PASS
21, one IA32 UP ACPI Windows Beta2 Vista VMX domain
PASS
22, one IA32 SMP Windows 2K3 VMX domain				PASS
23, one IA32 SMP Windows XP VMX domain				PASS
24, one IA32 SMP Windows Beta 2 Vista VMX domain
PASS
25, one IA32 SMP Windows RTM Vista VMX domain			PASS
26. VBD and VNIF works on UP VMX domain			PASS
27. Save and Restore
PASS
28. Live migration
PASS

Platform : PAE
Service OS : Fedora Core release 5 (Bordeaux)
Hardware : Conroe
Xen package: 15512:aa640601575f
Date: Tue Jul 10 15:31:45 EDT 2007

               Summary Test Report of Last Session
====================================================================  	         
Total   Pass    Fail    NoResult   Crash
====================================================================control_panel
12      9       1         2        0
Restart                     1       1       0         0        0
gtest                       14      13      1         0        0
====================================================================control_panel
12      9       1         2        0
 :XEN_four_vmx_xenu_seq_P   1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_4G_guest_PAE_gPAE     1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_LM_PAE_gPAE           1       0       1         0        0
 :XEN_xenu_pae_on_64_PAE_   1       0       0         1        0
 :XEN_four_dguest_co_PAE_   1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_linux_win_PAE_gPAE    1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_SR_PAE_gPAE           1       0       0         1        0
 :XEN_vmx_vcpu_pin_PAE_gP   1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_1500M_guest_PAE_gPA   1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_two_winxp_PAE_gPAE    1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_vmx_4vcpu_PAE_gPAE    1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_four_sguest_seq_PAE   1       1       0         0        0
Restart                     1       1       0         0        0
 :GuestPAE_PAE_gPAE         1       1       0         0        0
gtest                       14      13      1         0        0
 :boot_up_acpi_PAE_gPAE     1       1       0         0        0
 :ltp_nightly_PAE_gPAE      1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_up_acpi_xp_PAE_gPA   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_up_vista_PAE_gPAE    1       0       1         0        0
 :boot_up_acpi_win2k3_PAE   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_base_kernel_PAE_gP   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_smp_acpi_win2k3_PA   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_smp_acpi_win2k_PAE   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_up_acpi_win2k_PAE_   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_smp_acpi_xp_PAE_gP   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_up_noacpi_win2k_PA   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_up_noacpi_win2k3_P   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_up_noacpi_xp_PAE_g   1       1       0         0        0
 :kb_nightly_PAE_gPAE       1       1       0         0        0
====================================================================Total       
27      23      2         2        0
                    
Platform: IA32E
service os: RHEL4u3. IA32E. SMP
hardware: Woodcrest
default guest os: IA32E.SMP. 2.6 kernel

1. one xenU domain with memory 256M
PASS
2. one FC5 IA32 nonPAE SMP 2.6 Linux VMX domain with memory 256M
PASS
3. one FC5 PAE SMP Linux VMX domain with 1500M			PASS
4. one FC5 PAE SMP Linux VMX domain with 5120M memory		PASS
5. one FC5 IA32E SMP Linux VMX domain with 512M memory 		PASS
6. one FC5 IA32E SMP Linux VMX domain with 5120M memory		PASS
7. Two 5120M FC5 IA32E Linux VMX domain coexist			PASS
8. one FC3 Linux VMX boot with IA32E SMP base kernel(2.6.16)
PASS	
9. one FC5 IA32E SMP Linux VMX domain with acpi enable		PASS
10. 2 FC5 IA32E SMP Linux VMX domains and 2 xenU VMX domains coexist
PASS
11. Four FC5 IA32E SMP Linux VMX domains coexist
PASS
12. FC3/FC5/RHEL4u1/RHEL4u3 network in IA32E SMP Linux VMX domain
PASS
13. network in XenU domain
PASS
14. Startx in RHEL4U3 IA32E SMP Linux VMX domain
PASS
15. StartX in Dom0
PASS
16. xm-test
PASS
17. subset LTP in RHEL4U1 IA32E Linux VMX domain
PASS
18. Build base kernel in RHEL4U1 IA32E Linux VMX domain		PASS
19. one IA32 UP nonACPI Windows VMX domain
PASS
20. one IA32 UP noACPI 2K3 and XPsp2 Windows VMX domains coexist PASS
21. one IA32 UP ACPI Windows 2K VMX domain
PASS
22. one IA32 UP ACPI Windows XP VMX domain
PASS
23. one IA32 UP ACPI Windows 2K3 VMX domain			PASS
25. one IA32 SMP Windows XP VMX domain				PASS
26. one IA32 SMP Windows 2K3 VMX domain				PASS
27. one IA32 SMP Windows Beta 2 Vista VMX domain
PASS
28.one IA32 SMP Windows RTM Vista VMX domain			PASS
29. one IA32E UP Windows XP VMX domain				PASS
30. one IA32E UP Windows 2K3 VMX domain				PASS
31. one IA32E UP Windows Vista VMX domain
PASS
32. one IA32E SMP Windows XP VMX domain				PASS
33. one IA32E SMP Windows 2K3 VMX domain
PASS
34. one IA32E SMP Windows Beta 2 Vista VMX domain
PASS
35. one IA32E SMP Windows RTM Vista VMX domain 			PASS
36. one IA32E SMP Windows Vista with 5120 M memory
PASS
37. Two 5120M IA32 SMP Win2K3 VMX domain and
	IA32E Linux VMX domain coexist				PASS
38. VBD and VNIF works on UP VMX domain			PASS
39. Save / Restore
PASS
40. boot 32-bits PAE xenU on 64-bits				PASS 
41. Live migration
PASS

Platform : x86_64
Service OS : Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 3)
Hardware : Woodcrest
Xen package: 15521:1f348e70a5af
Date: Thu Jul 12 15:51:10 CST 2007

               Summary Test Report of Last Session
====================================================================  	         
Total   Pass    Fail    NoResult   Crash
====================================================================control_panel
16      11      5         0        0
Restart                     2       2       0         0        0
gtest                       13      13      0         0        0
====================================================================control_panel
16      11      5         0        0
 :XEN_1500M_guest_64_g64    1       0       1         0        0
 :XEN_256M_xenu_64_gPAE     1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_vmx_4vcpu_64_g64      1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_1500M_guest_64_gPAE   1       0       1         0        0
 :XEN_4G_guest_64_gPAE      1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_SR_64_g64             1       0       1         0        0
 :XEN_four_sguest_seq_64_   1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_vmx_vcpu_pin_64_g64   1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_linux_win_64_g64      1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_LM_64_g64             1       0       1         0        0
 :XEN_two_winxp_64_g64      1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_four_vmx_xenu_seq_6   1       0       1         0        0
 :XEN_four_sguest_seq_64_   1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_4G_guest_64_g64       1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_xenu_pae_on_64_64_g   1       1       0         0        0
 :XEN_four_dguest_co_64_g   1       1       0         0        0
Restart                     2       2       0         0        0
 :GuestPAE_64_gPAE          1       1       0         0        0
 :Guest64_64_gPAE           1       1       0         0        0
gtest                       13      13      0         0        0
 :boot_up_acpi_win2k3_64_   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_smp_acpi_xp_64_g64   1       1       0         0        0
 :bootx_64_g64              1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_smp_acpi_win2k_64_   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_up_vista_64_g64      1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_up_noacpi_win2k_64   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_base_kernel_64_g64   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_up_acpi_win2k_64_g   1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_up_acpi_xp_64_g64    1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_smp_acpi_win2k3_64   1       1       0         0        0
 :ltp_nightly_64_g64        1       1       0         0        0
 :boot_up_acpi_64_g64       1       1       0         0        0
 :kb_nightly_64_g64         1       1       0         0        0
====================================================================Total       
31      26      5         0        0

Yunfeng




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Steven Hand

2007-Jul-13 07:09 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 15521 - 2 new issues

>New issues (2)
>================================================>1) Data corrupted after
copied into a 32bit win2k3 guest on 64bit
>hypervisor with rtl8139
>http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1025
Have you tried this with: 
   - 32bit windows guest on 32bit or PAE hypervisor?
   - 64bit windows guest on 64bit hypervisor? 

It''d also be good to know what the extent of the corruption is, e.g. 
if it affects just certain pages, etc.


cheers,

S.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Zhao, Yunfeng

2007-Jul-13 07:20 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 15521 - 2 new issues

>>New issues (2)
>>================================================>>1) Data
corrupted after copied into a 32bit win2k3 guest on 64bit
>>hypervisor with rtl8139
>>http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1025
>
>Have you tried this with:
>   - 32bit windows guest on 32bit or PAE hypervisor?
>   - 64bit windows guest on 64bit hypervisor?[Yunfeng] I tried 32bit/pae and 64bit/64bit, and I cannot reproduce this
issue on them.>
>It''d also be good to know what the extent of the corruption is,
e.g.
>if it affects just certain pages, etc.[Yunfeng] Do you have any good way to get this kind of info?
>
>
>cheers,
>
>S.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Steven Hand

2007-Jul-13 07:31 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 15521 - 2 new issues

>>>1) Data corrupted after copied into a 32bit win2k3 guest on 64bit
>>>hypervisor with rtl8139
>>>http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1025
>>
>>Have you tried this with:
>>   - 32bit windows guest on 32bit or PAE hypervisor?
>>   - 64bit windows guest on 64bit hypervisor?
>[Yunfeng] I tried 32bit/pae and 64bit/64bit, and I cannot reproduce this
>issue on them.
Ok, that''s interesting. 
>>It''d also be good to know what the extent of the corruption is,
e.g.
>>if it affects just certain pages, etc.
>[Yunfeng] Do you have any good way to get this kind of info?
Just comparing the source and destination file page by page (or byte
by byte) and working out the ranges of differences? 

(To make this even easier, start with a known, homogenous file (e.g. 
all 0xa5 or something) - on receipt check md5sum of each page, and 
note any differences in pages which fail the check). 

cheers,

S.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Zhao, Yunfeng

2007-Jul-13 07:41 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 15521 - 2 new issues

>>>It''d also be good to know what the extent of the corruption
is, e.g.
>>>if it affects just certain pages, etc.
>>[Yunfeng] Do you have any good way to get this kind of info?
>
>Just comparing the source and destination file page by page (or byte
>by byte) and working out the ranges of differences?
>
>(To make this even easier, start with a known, homogenous file (e.g.
>all 0xa5 or something) - on receipt check md5sum of each page, and
>note any differences in pages which fail the check).[Yunfeng] I tried to diff two 400M files that before and after copied
into the guest. The difference is few. But I can not figure out where
the problem is.
I attached the diff. The first half data sect is before copy, and the
second is after copy.
>
>cheers,
>
>S.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Mats Petersson

2007-Jul-14 09:33 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 15521 - 2 new issues

At 08:31 13/07/2007, Steven Hand wrote:
> >>>1) Data corrupted after copied into a 32bit win2k3 guest on
64bit
> >>>hypervisor with rtl8139
> >>>http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1025
> >>
> >>Have you tried this with:
> >>   - 32bit windows guest on 32bit or PAE hypervisor?
> >>   - 64bit windows guest on 64bit hypervisor?
> >[Yunfeng] I tried 32bit/pae and 64bit/64bit, and I cannot reproduce
this
> >issue on them.
>
>Ok, that''s interesting.
>
> >>It''d also be good to know what the extent of the
corruption is, e.g.
> >>if it affects just certain pages, etc.
> >[Yunfeng] Do you have any good way to get this kind of info?
>
>Just comparing the source and destination file page by page (or byte
>by byte) and working out the ranges of differences?

Have you tried filling the buffer in QEMU with a known pattern - from 
the description Steven gave, it looks like it may be using an "old" 
buffer, so after the buffer has been "emptied", could you fill it 
with something, and see if that''s what occurs in the "bad
packet"?
[Admittedly, I don''t really know if there''s any easy way to
know when
the packet has actually been "consumed" by the driver in Windows!).

It also looked like the data in the file was code or something like 
that - have you tried preparing a file where it''s easy to see that 
the bytes are in the correct order (e.g. fill a file with longwords 
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and so on). Then you should be able to see if it''s a 
"newer" or "older" packet that is incorrectly inserted (I
presume).

--
Mats

>(To make this even easier, start with a known, homogenous file (e.g.
>all 0xa5 or something) - on receipt check md5sum of each page, and
>note any differences in pages which fail the check).
>
>cheers,
>
>S.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-devel mailing list
>Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Ian Pratt

2007-Jul-17 12:51 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 15521 - 2new issues

> At 08:31 13/07/2007, Steven Hand wrote:
> 
> > >>>1) Data corrupted after copied into a 32bit win2k3 guest
on 64bit
> > >>>hypervisor with rtl8139
> >
>>>http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1025
We fixed this yesterday, and sent the fix upstream to qemu:

http://xenbits.xensource.com/staging/xen-unstable.hg?rev/1158b6115b14

Ian


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Zhao, Yunfeng

2007-Jul-17 13:50 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 15521 - 2new issues

Yes, I have tried the patch. With this patch, rtl8139 nic works very well.
Copying big files into a 32bit win2k3 for 10 hours has no any error.

Thanks
Yunfeng
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ian Pratt [mailto:Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk]
>Sent: 2007年7月17日 20:52
>To: Mats Petersson; Steven Hand; Zhao, Yunfeng
>Cc: Steven Hand; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com; Steven.Hand@cl.cam.ac.uk;
>ian.pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk
>Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 15521 - 2new
issues
>
>> At 08:31 13/07/2007, Steven Hand wrote:
>>
>> > >>>1) Data corrupted after copied into a 32bit win2k3
guest on 64bit
>> > >>>hypervisor with rtl8139
>> >
>>>http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1025
>
>We fixed this yesterday, and sent the fix upstream to qemu:
>
>http://xenbits.xensource.com/staging/xen-unstable.hg?rev/1158b6115b14
>
>Ian
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Maybe Matching Threads

Search for more seemingly similar threads

Xen devel - Jul 2007 - vmx status report against changeset 15521 - 2 new issues

[Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 15521 - 2 new issues

Re: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 15521 - 2 new issues

RE: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 15521 - 2 new issues

Re: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 15521 - 2 new issues

RE: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 15521 - 2 new issues

Re: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 15521 - 2 new issues

RE: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 15521 - 2new issues

RE: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 15521 - 2new issues

Maybe Matching Threads