May 11, 2006, using xen-unstable changeset:
changeset: 9972:91c77df11b43
tag: tip
user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date: Wed May 10 11:30:42 2006 +0100
summary: When we copy packet sin netback/netfront make sure the new skb has
x86_32 (no PAE support)
* SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235(512MB RAM)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
* Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test
* Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures -
XmTestLib.Console.Consol...
Note: test logs attached to defects in Xensource Bugzilla.
x86_32 (PAE)
* SLES 9 SP2 on xSeries 335 and HS20 Blade 8843and FC4 on IBM
xSeries 335s
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
* Bugzilla Bug 543 - domU: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1!
* Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test
* Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures -
XmTestLib.Console.Consol...
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 IBM HS20 Blades 8843 41U)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
XM-TEST Results
---------------
SUMMARY:
Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 | 103 | 12 | 0 | 3 |
hs20.rhel4-x86_32pae | 104 | 11 | 0 | 3 |
x235sles9nonpae | 90 | 22 | 0 | 3 |
x335sles9_pae4gb | 76 | 39 | 0 | 3 |
--
Regards,
David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM
"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
Euripides
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
May 12, 2006, using xen-unstable changeset:
changeset: 9981:062d109ce872
tag: tip
user: cl349@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date: Thu May 11 16:39:44 2006 +0100
summary: Fix network bridge script to select the right interface when bridge
already exists.
x86_32 (no PAE support)
* SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235(512MB RAM)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
* Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test
* Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures -
XmTestLib.Console.Consol...
Note: test logs attached to defects in Xensource Bugzilla.
x86_32 (PAE)
* SLES 9 SP2 on xSeries 335 and HS20 Blade 8843and FC4 on IBM
xSeries 335s
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
* Bugzilla Bug 543 - domU: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1!
* Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test
* Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures -
XmTestLib.Console.Consol...
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 IBM HS20 Blades 8843 41U)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
XM-TEST Results
---------------
SUMMARY:
Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 | 107 | 8 | 0 | 3 |
hs20.rhel4-x86_32pae | 106 | 9 | 0 | 3 |
x235sles9nonpae | 68 | 44 | 0 | 3 |
x335fc4pae | 101 | 14 | 0 | 3 |
x335sles9_pae4gb | 81 | 34 | 0 | 3 |
--
Regards,
David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM
"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
Euripides
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
May 15, 2006, using xen-unstable changeset:
changeset: 9992:cb70d4f8d718
tag: tip
user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date: Mon May 15 01:51:07 2006 +0100
summary: Fix spelling errors in man pages.
x86_32 (no PAE support)
* SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235(512MB RAM)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
* Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test
* Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures -
XmTestLib.Console.Consol...
Note: test logs attached to defects in Xensource Bugzilla.
x86_32 (PAE)
* SLES 9 SP2 on xSeries 335 and HS20 Blade 8843and FC4 on IBM
xSeries 335s
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
* Bugzilla Bug 543 - domU: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1!
* Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test
* Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures -
XmTestLib.Console.Consol...
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 IBM HS20 Blades 8843 41U)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES: XM-TEST Results
---------------
SUMMARY:
Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 | 107 | 8 | 0 | 3 |
hs20.rhel4-x86_32pae | 103 | 12 | 0 | 3 |
x335fc4pae | 99 | 16 | 0 | 3 |
x335sles9_pae4gb | 71 | 44 | 0 | 3 |
--
Regards,
David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM
"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
Euripides
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
May 16, 2006, using xen-unstable changeset:
changeset: 9994:4fd6ba0e3336
tag: tip
user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date: Tue May 16 03:08:06 2006 +0100
summary: [XENOPROFILE] Fix incorrect use of on_each_cpu() which could lead
x86_32 (no PAE support)
* SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235(512MB RAM)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
* Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test
* Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures -
XmTestLib.Console.Consol...
Note: test logs attached to defects in Xensource Bugzilla.
x86_32 (PAE)
* SLES 9 SP2 on xSeries 335 and HS20 Blade 8843and FC4 on IBM
xSeries 335s
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
* Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test
* Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures - XmTestLib.Console.Consol...
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 IBM HS20 Blades 8843 41U)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
XM-TEST Results
---------------
Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 | 107 | 8 | 0 | 3 |
hs20.rhel4-x86_32pae | 106 | 9 | 0 | 3 |
x335fc4pae | 98 | 17 | 0 | 3 |
x335sles9_pae4gb | 81 | 34 | 0 | 3 |
--
Regards,
David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM
"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
Euripides
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
May 17, 2006, using xen-unstable changeset:
changeset: 10004:7cbc1fc8dbea
tag: tip
user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date: Tue May 16 13:54:41 2006 +0100
summary: Add some locking to the PIC device model. Improves SMP guest
stability.
x86_32 (no PAE support)
* SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235(512MB RAM)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
* Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test
* Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures -
XmTestLib.Console.Consol...
Note: test logs attached to defects in Xensource Bugzilla.
x86_32 (PAE)
* SLES 9 SP2 on xSeries 335 and HS20 Blade 8843and FC4 on IBM
xSeries 335s
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
* Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test
* Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures -
XmTestLib.Console.Consol...
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 IBM HS20 Blades 8843 41U)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
XM-TEST Results:
Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 | 103 | 12 | 0 | 3 |
hs20.rhel4-x86_32pae | 103 | 12 | 0 | 3 |
x335fc4pae | 98 | 17 | 0 | 3 |
x335sles9_pae4gb | 78 | 37 | 0 | 3 |
--
Regards,
David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM
"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
Euripides
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
May 18, 2006, using xen-unstable changeset:
changeset: 10028:25dbb1819633
tag: tip
user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date: Thu May 18 04:43:05 2006 +0100
summary: Remove __TEST_HARNESS__ tests from x86_emulate: instead check for
__XEN__
x86_32 (no PAE support)
* SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235(512MB RAM)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
* Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test
* Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures -
XmTestLib.Console.Consol...
Note: test logs attached to defects in Xensource Bugzilla.
x86_32 (PAE)
* SLES 9 SP2 on xSeries 335 and HS20 Blade 8843and FC4 on IBM
xSeries 335s * Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
* Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test
* Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures - XmTestLib.Console.Consol...
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 IBM HS20 Blades 8843 41U)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
===============XM-TEST Results:
Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 | 104 | 11 | 0 | 3 |
hs20.rhel4-x86_32pae | 102 | 13 | 0 | 3 |
x335fc4pae | 96 | 19 | 0 | 3 |
x335sles9_pae4gb | 78 | 37 | 0 | 3 |
--
Regards,
David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM
"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
Euripides
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
May 19, 2006, using xen-unstable changeset:
changeset: 10032:aa17b7173325
tag: tip
user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date: Thu May 18 15:41:56 2006 +0100
summary: [NET] front: remove unnecessary include of proc_fs.h.
x86_32 (no PAE support)
* SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235(512MB RAM)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
* Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test
* Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures -
XmTestLib.Console.Consol...
Note: test logs attached to defects in Xensource Bugzilla.
x86_32 (PAE)
* SLES 9 SP2 on xSeries 335 and HS20 Blade 8843and FC4 on IBM
xSeries 335s
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
* Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test
* Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures -
XmTestLib.Console.Consol...
* Bugzilla 543 domU: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1!
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 IBM HS20 Blades 8843 41U)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
===============XM-TEST Results:
Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 | 106 | 9 | 0 | 3 |
hs20.rhel4-x86_32pae | 106 | 9 | 0 | 3 |
x335fc4pae | 100 | 15 | 0 | 3 |
x335sles9_pae4gb | 78 | 37 | 0 | 3 |
--
Regards,
David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM
"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
Euripides
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
May 22, 2006, using xen-unstable changeset:
changeset: 10058:14717dedba02
tag: tip
user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date: Sun May 21 14:15:58 2006 +0100
summary: [LOADER] More sanity checks when parsing Elf images to avoid
x86_32 (no PAE support)
* SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235(512MB RAM)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
* Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test
* Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures -
XmTestLib.Console.Consol...
Note: test logs attached to defects in Xensource Bugzilla.
x86_32 (PAE)
* SLES 9 SP2 on xSeries 335 and HS20 Blade 8843and FC4 on IBM xSeries 335s
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
* Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test
* Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures - XmTestLib.Console.Consol...
* Bugzilla 543 domU: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1!
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 IBM HS20 Blades 8843 41U)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
===============XM-TEST Results:
Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 | 107 | 8 | 0 | 3 |
hs20.rhel4-x86_32pae | 105 | 10 | 0 | 3 |
x235sles9nonpae | 69 | 43 | 0 | 3 |
x335fc4pae | 95 | 20 | 0 | 3 |
x335sles9_pae4gb | 82 | 33 | 0 | 3 |
--
Regards,
David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM
"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
Euripides
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
May 25, 2006, using xen-unstable changeset:
changeset: 10151:ad33b3882867
tag: tip
user: cl349@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date: Wed May 24 13:41:47 2006 +0100
summary: Fix IDE CD-drive PIO mode.
x86_32 (no PAE support)
* SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235(512MB RAM)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
* Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test
* Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures -
XmTestLib.Console.Consol...
Note: test logs attached to defects in Xensource Bugzilla.
x86_32 (PAE)
* SLES 9 SP2 on xSeries 335 and HS20 Blade 8843and FC4 on IBM
xSeries 335s
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
* Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test
* Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures - XmTestLib.Console.Consol...
* Bugzilla 543 domU: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1!
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 IBM HS20 Blades 8843 41U)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
==============
XM-TEST Results:
Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 | 106 | 9 | 0 | 3 |
hs20.rhel4-x86_32pae | 106 | 9 | 0 | 3 |
x235sles9nonpae | 65 | 47 | 0 | 3 |
x335fc4pae | 97 | 18 | 0 | 3 |
x335sles9_pae4gb | 83 | 32 | 0 | 3 |
--
Regards,
David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM
"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
Euripides
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
May 30, 2006, using xen-unstable changeset:
changeset: 10176:6d476981e3a5
tag: tip
user: ack@kneesa.uk.xensource.com
date: Sun May 28 09:49:17 2006 +0100
summary: Update docs for new credit scheduler and cleanup out of date
scheduler stuff.
x86_32 (no PAE support)
* SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235(512MB RAM)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
* Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test
* Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures -
XmTestLib.Console.Consol...
Note: test logs attached to defects in Xensource Bugzilla.
x86_32 (PAE)
* SLES 9 SP2 on xSeries 335 and HS20 Blade 8843and FC4 on IBM
xSeries 335s * Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
* Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test
* Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures - XmTestLib.Console.Consol...
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 IBM HS20 Blades 8843 41U)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
XM-TEST Results:
---------------
Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 | 105 | 10 | 0 | 3 |
x235sles9nonpae | 68 | 44 | 0 | 3 |
x335fc4pae | 94 | 21 | 0 | 3 |
--
Regards,
David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM
"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
Euripides
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
May 31, 2006, using xen-unstable changeset:
changeset: 10187:afabaa39be52
tag: tip
user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date: Wed May 31 01:20:36 2006 +0100
summary: Fix x86/64 definition of dma_get_cache_alignment().
x86_32 (no PAE support)
* SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235(512MB RAM)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
* Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test
* Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures -
XmTestLib.Console.Consol...
Note: test logs attached to defects in Xensource Bugzilla.
x86_32 (PAE)
* SLES 9 SP2 on xSeries 335 and HS20 Blade 8843and FC4 on IBM
xSeries 335s
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
* Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test
* Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures - XmTestLib.Console.Consol...
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 IBM HS20 Blades 8843 41U)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Able to create fully functional guest domains
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
XM-TEST Results :
Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 | 107 | 8 | 0 | 3 |
x235sles9nonpae | 68 | 44 | 0 | 3 |
x335fc4pae | 90 | 25 | 0 | 3 |
--
Regards,
David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM
"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
Euripides
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
June 12, 2006, using xen-unstable changeset:
changeset: 10326:34ff26fb2240
tag: tip
user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date: Mon Jun 12 06:01:32 2006 +0100
summary: [HVM][VMX] Fix error-detection inline asm code. Zero word-sized
x86_32 (no PAE support)
* SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235(512MB RAM)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
Note: these problems are due to the way xm-test works, rather than xen problems.
* Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test
* Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures -
x86_32 (PAE)
* SLES 9 SP2 on xSeries 335 and HS20 Blade 8843and FC4 on IBM xSeries 335s
* Builds and boots without problems
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
* Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test
* Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures - XmTestLib.Console.Consol...
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 IBM HS20 Blades 8843 41U)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
XM-TEST Results :
Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 | 109 | 8 | 0 | 3 |
hs20.rhel14-x86 | 76 | 40 | 0 | 3 |
x235sles9nonpae | 70 | 47 | 0 | 3 |
x335fc4pae | 83 | 34 | 0 | 3 |
x335sles9_pae4gb | 93 | 23 | 0 | 3 |
--
Regards,
David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM
"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
Euripides
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
David F Barrera wrote:> June 12, 2006, using xen-unstable changeset: > > changeset: 10326:34ff26fb2240 > tag: tip > user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk > date: Mon Jun 12 06:01:32 2006 +0100 > summary: [HVM][VMX] Fix error-detection inline asm code. Zero > word-sized > > x86_32 (no PAE support) > > * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235(512MB RAM) > * Builds and boots without problems > * Ran xm-test on all boxes > > ISSUES: > > Note: these problems are due to the way xm-test works, rather than xen > problems. > * Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test > * Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures - > > x86_32 (PAE) > > * SLES 9 SP2 on xSeries 335 and HS20 Blade 8843and FC4 on IBM xSeries > 335s * Builds and boots without problems > * Ran xm-test on all boxes > > ISSUES: > * Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test > * Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures - > XmTestLib.Console.Consol... > > x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 IBM HS20 Blades 8843 41U) > > * Builds and boots without problems > * Ran xm-test on all boxes > > ISSUES: > > XM-TEST Results : > Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL | > ---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+ > hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 | 109 | 8 | 0 | 3 | > hs20.rhel14-x86 | 76 | 40 | 0 | 3 | > x235sles9nonpae | 70 | 47 | 0 | 3 | > x335fc4pae | 83 | 34 | 0 | 3 | > x335sles9_pae4gb | 93 | 23 | 0 | 3 |I''m not sure what''s happening on your systems, but on my development system (i386 Ubuntu), I''m seeing only a few unexpected FAILs. I''ve run xm-test about a dozen times on the recent tip with more or less consistent results (including with the new scheduler). Perhaps there''s something wrong in your setup? Attached is a canonical example of one of the recent xm-test reports. Regards, Anthony Liguori _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Anthony Liguori wrote:> David F Barrera wrote: >> June 12, 2006, using xen-unstable changeset: >> >> changeset: 10326:34ff26fb2240 >> tag: tip >> user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk >> date: Mon Jun 12 06:01:32 2006 +0100 >> summary: [HVM][VMX] Fix error-detection inline asm code. Zero >> word-sized >> >> x86_32 (no PAE support) >> >> * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235(512MB RAM) >> * Builds and boots without problems >> * Ran xm-test on all boxes >> >> ISSUES: >> >> Note: these problems are due to the way xm-test works, rather than >> xen problems. >> * Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test >> * Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures - >> >> x86_32 (PAE) >> >> * SLES 9 SP2 on xSeries 335 and HS20 Blade 8843and FC4 on IBM xSeries >> 335s * Builds and boots without problems >> * Ran xm-test on all boxes >> >> ISSUES: >> * Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test >> * Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures - >> XmTestLib.Console.Consol... >> >> x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 IBM HS20 Blades 8843 41U) >> >> * Builds and boots without problems >> * Ran xm-test on all boxes >> >> ISSUES: >> >> XM-TEST Results : >> Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL | >> ---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+ >> hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 | 109 | 8 | 0 | 3 | >> hs20.rhel14-x86 | 76 | 40 | 0 | 3 | >> x235sles9nonpae | 70 | 47 | 0 | 3 | >> x335fc4pae | 83 | 34 | 0 | 3 | >> x335sles9_pae4gb | 93 | 23 | 0 | 3 | > > I''m not sure what''s happening on your systems, but on my development > system (i386 Ubuntu), I''m seeing only a few unexpected FAILs. I''ve > run xm-test about a dozen times on the recent tip with more or less > consistent results (including with the new scheduler). Perhaps > there''s something wrong in your setup? > > Attached is a canonical example of one of the recent xm-test reports. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Xm-test execution summary: > PASS: 108 > FAIL: 7 > XPASS: 0 > XFAIL: 3 > > > Details: > > FAIL: 02_block_device_write_verify > Failed to get md5sum of data written in domU. > > FAIL: 16_create_smallmem_neg > Starting a console with 16 MB passed, expected test to fail > > XFAIL: 02_network_local_ping_pos > ping loopback failed for size 65507. ping eth0 failed for size 65507. > > XFAIL: 05_network_dom0_ping_pos > Ping to dom0 failed for size 1 48 64 512 1440 1500 1505 4096 4192 32767 65507. > > FAIL: 06_network_dom0_tcp_pos > TCP hping2 to dom0 failed for size 1 48 64 512 1440 1500 1505 4096 4192 32767 65495. > > FAIL: 07_network_dom0_udp_pos > UDP hping2 to dom0 failed for size 1 48 64 512 1440 1500 1505 4096 4192 32767 65495. > > XFAIL: 11_network_domU_ping_pos > Ping failed for size 65507. > >Here''s a snippet of one test (multiply this many times): *** Test 14_create_blockroot_pos started at Mon Jun 12 07:04:21 2006 CDT [dom0] Running `ip addr show |grep "inet 169.254" | grep -v vif'' [dom0] Running `ip addr show dev vif0.0'' 2: vif0.0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 169.254.0.2/32 scope global vif0.0 inet6 fe80::fcff:ffff:feff:ffff/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever [dom0] Running `ip addr del 169.254.0.2 dev vif0.0'' *** Cleaning all running domU''s [dom0] Running `xm list'' Name ID Mem(MiB) VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 500 4 r----- 693.3 *** Finished cleaning domUs *** Test 14_create_blockroot_pos started at Mon Jun 12 07:04:22 2006 CDT [dom0] Running `ip addr show |grep "inet 169.254" | grep -v vif'' [dom0] Running `ip addr show dev vif0.0'' 2: vif0.0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::fcff:ffff:feff:ffff/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever [dom0] Running `xm create /tmp/xm-test.conf'' Using config file "/tmp/xm-test.conf". Started domain 14_create_blockroot Console executing: [''/usr/sbin/xm'', ''xm'', ''console'', ''14_create_blockroot''] [14_create_blockroot] Sending `input'' Traceback (most recent call last): File "./14_create_blockroot_pos.test", line 34, in ? console = domain.start() File "/usr/local/autobench/var/tmp/xen/xen-unstable.hg/tools/xm-test/lib/XmTestLib/XenDomain.py", line 233, in start return self.getConsole() File "/usr/local/autobench/var/tmp/xen/xen-unstable.hg/tools/xm-test/lib/XmTestLib/XenDomain.py", line 284, in getConsole self.console.sendInput("input") File "/usr/local/autobench/var/tmp/xen/xen-unstable.hg/tools/xm-test/lib/XmTestLib/Console.py", line 231, in sendInput realOutput = self.__runCmd(input) File "/usr/local/autobench/var/tmp/xen/xen-unstable.hg/tools/xm-test/lib/XmTestLib/Console.py", line 179, in __runCmd raise ConsoleError("Timed out waiting for console") XmTestLib.Console.ConsoleError: Timed out waiting for console FAIL: 14_create_blockroot_pos.test -- Regards, David F Barrera Linux Technology Center Systems and Technology Group, IBM "The wisest men follow their own direction. " Euripides _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Anthony Liguori wrote:> David F Barrera wrote: >> June 12, 2006, using xen-unstable changeset: >> >> changeset: 10326:34ff26fb2240 >> tag: tip >> user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk >> date: Mon Jun 12 06:01:32 2006 +0100 >> summary: [HVM][VMX] Fix error-detection inline asm code. Zero >> word-sized >> >> x86_32 (no PAE support) >> >> * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235(512MB RAM) >> * Builds and boots without problems >> * Ran xm-test on all boxes >> >> ISSUES: >> >> Note: these problems are due to the way xm-test works, rather than >> xen problems. >> * Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test >> * Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures - >> >> x86_32 (PAE) >> >> * SLES 9 SP2 on xSeries 335 and HS20 Blade 8843and FC4 on IBM xSeries >> 335s * Builds and boots without problems >> * Ran xm-test on all boxes >> >> ISSUES: >> * Bugzilla 637 NEW xm-test FAIL: 01_block_attach_device_pos.test >> * Bugzilla 639 NEW xm-test multiple test failures - >> XmTestLib.Console.Consol... >> >> x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 IBM HS20 Blades 8843 41U) >> >> * Builds and boots without problems >> * Ran xm-test on all boxes >> >> ISSUES: >> >> XM-TEST Results : >> Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL | >> ---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+ >> hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 | 109 | 8 | 0 | 3 | >> hs20.rhel14-x86 | 76 | 40 | 0 | 3 | >> x235sles9nonpae | 70 | 47 | 0 | 3 | >> x335fc4pae | 83 | 34 | 0 | 3 | >> x335sles9_pae4gb | 93 | 23 | 0 | 3 | > > I''m not sure what''s happening on your systems, but on my development > system (i386 Ubuntu), I''m seeing only a few unexpected FAILs. I''ve > run xm-test about a dozen times on the recent tip with more or less > consistent results (including with the new scheduler). Perhaps > there''s something wrong in your setup? > > Attached is a canonical example of one of the recent xm-test reports. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Xm-test execution summary: > PASS: 108 > FAIL: 7 > XPASS: 0 > XFAIL: 3 > > > Details: > > FAIL: 02_block_device_write_verify > Failed to get md5sum of data written in domU. > > FAIL: 16_create_smallmem_neg > Starting a console with 16 MB passed, expected test to fail > > XFAIL: 02_network_local_ping_pos > ping loopback failed for size 65507. ping eth0 failed for size 65507. > > XFAIL: 05_network_dom0_ping_pos > Ping to dom0 failed for size 1 48 64 512 1440 1500 1505 4096 4192 32767 65507. > > FAIL: 06_network_dom0_tcp_pos > TCP hping2 to dom0 failed for size 1 48 64 512 1440 1500 1505 4096 4192 32767 65495. > > FAIL: 07_network_dom0_udp_pos > UDP hping2 to dom0 failed for size 1 48 64 512 1440 1500 1505 4096 4192 32767 65495. > > XFAIL: 11_network_domU_ping_pos > Ping failed for size 65507. > >Here''s an interesting thing: I ran 01_create_basic_pos.test by itself. The first time, I completed successfully. I reran it, and the second time it failed: ... [dom0] Running `xm create /tmp/xm-test.conf'' Using config file "/tmp/xm-test.conf". Started domain 01_create_basic_pos-1150142503 Console executing: [''/usr/sbin/xm'', ''xm'', ''console'', ''01_create_basic_pos-1150142503''] [01_create_basic_pos-1150142503] Sending `input'' Traceback (most recent call last): File "./01_create_basic_pos.test", line 21, in ? console = domain.start() File "/usr/local/autobench/var/tmp/xen/xen-unstable.hg/tools/xm-test/lib/XmTestLib/XenDomain.py", line 233, in start return self.getConsole() File "/usr/local/autobench/var/tmp/xen/xen-unstable.hg/tools/xm-test/lib/XmTestLib/XenDomain.py", line 284, in getConsole self.console.sendInput("input") File "/usr/local/autobench/var/tmp/xen/xen-unstable.hg/tools/xm-test/lib/XmTestLib/Console.py", line 231, in sendInput realOutput = self.__runCmd(input) File "/usr/local/autobench/var/tmp/xen/xen-unstable.hg/tools/xm-test/lib/XmTestLib/Console.py", line 179, in __runCmd raise ConsoleError("Timed out waiting for console") XmTestLib.Console.ConsoleError: Timed out waiting for console FAIL: 01_create_basic_pos.test ==================1 of 1 tests failed ==================make[2]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/autobench/var/tmp/xen/xen-unstable.hg/tools/xm-test/tests/create'' make[1]: *** [check-am] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/autobench/var/tmp/xen/xen-unstable.hg/tools/xm-test/tests/create'' make: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/root -- Regards, David F Barrera Linux Technology Center Systems and Technology Group, IBM "The wisest men follow their own direction. " Euripides _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
June 14, 2006, using xen-unstable changeset:
changeset: 10333:360f9dc71f51
tag: tip
user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date: Tue Jun 13 05:41:15 2006 +0100
summary: [HVM] Fix ioemu build with new Lin
x86_32 (no PAE support)
* SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235(512MB RAM)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
* Bugzilla Bug 677 - xm-test failure: REASON: [Errno 5] Input/output error
x86_32 (PAE)
* SLES 9 SP2 on xSeries 335 and HS20 Blade 8843and FC4 on IBM xSeries 335s
* Builds and boots without problems
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 IBM HS20 Blades 8843 41U)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
XM-TEST Results *:
Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 | 109 | 8 | 0 | 3 |
x235sles9nonpae | 106 | 10 | 0 | 3 |
* Using a modified version of Console.py
--
Regards,
David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM
"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
Euripides
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
June 15, 2006, using xen-unstable changeset:
changeset: 10352:161473836da3
tag: tip
user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date: Wed Jun 14 16:15:13 2006 +0100
summary: [HVM][QEMU] Fix SDL mouse "invisible wall".
x86_32 (no PAE support)
* SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM xSeries 335(512MB RAM)and IBM HS20 Blades 8843 41U)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
* Bugzilla Bug 677 - xm-test failure: REASON: [Errno 5] Input/output error
ISSUES:
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 IBM HS20 Blades 8843 41U)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
XM-TEST Results *:
Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 | 105 | 12 | 0 | 3 |
hs20.rhel4-x86_32 | 69 | 47 | 0 | 3 |
x335fc4 | 85 | 32 | 0 | 3 |
--
Regards,
David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM
"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
Euripides
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
June 16, 2006, using xen-unstable changeset:
changeset: 10359:231e07e22f9c
tag: tip
user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date: Fri Jun 16 04:52:49 2006 +0100
summary: [LINUX] Export new gnttab_cancel_free_callback() to modules.
x86_32 (no PAE support)
* SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM xSeries 335(512MB RAM)and IBM HS20 Blades 8843 41U)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
* Bugzilla Bug 677 - xm-test failure: REASON: [Errno 5] Input/output error
ISSUES:
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 IBM HS20 Blades 8843 41U)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
XM-TEST Results:
Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 | 107 | 10 | 0 | 3 |
hs20.rhel4-x86_32 | 70 | 47*| 0 | 3 |
x335fc4 | 90 | 27*| 0 | 3 |
x335sles9 | 71 | 45*| 0 | 3 |
* Problem in xm-test
--
Regards,
David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM
"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
Euripides
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
I see PAE is still broken with >4GB (SMP) (on 10363), is that the reason
you did not include the test results for PAE?
Jun
---
Intel Open Source Technology Center
-----Original Message-----
From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of David F
Barrera
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 11:07 AM
To: xen-devel
Subject: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds
June 16, 2006, using xen-unstable changeset:
changeset: 10359:231e07e22f9c
tag: tip
user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date: Fri Jun 16 04:52:49 2006 +0100
summary: [LINUX] Export new gnttab_cancel_free_callback() to
modules.
x86_32 (no PAE support)
* SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM xSeries 335(512MB RAM)and IBM HS20 Blades
8843 41U)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
* Bugzilla Bug 677 - xm-test failure: REASON: [Errno 5] Input/output
error
ISSUES:
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 IBM HS20 Blades 8843 41U)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
XM-TEST Results:
Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 | 107 | 10 | 0 | 3 |
hs20.rhel4-x86_32 | 70 | 47*| 0 | 3 |
x335fc4 | 90 | 27*| 0 | 3 |
x335sles9 | 71 | 45*| 0 | 3 |
* Problem in xm-test
--
Regards,
David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM
"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
Euripides
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Nakajima, Jun wrote:> I see PAE is still broken with >4GB (SMP) (on 10363), is that the reason > you did not include the test results for PAE? >Actually, no. We are still ironing out some kinks in our automation, which has prevented me from testing PAE.> Jun > --- > Intel Open Source Technology Center > > -----Original Message----- > From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com > [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of David F > Barrera > Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 11:07 AM > To: xen-devel > Subject: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds > > June 16, 2006, using xen-unstable changeset: > > changeset: 10359:231e07e22f9c > tag: tip > user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk > date: Fri Jun 16 04:52:49 2006 +0100 > summary: [LINUX] Export new gnttab_cancel_free_callback() to > modules. > > x86_32 (no PAE support) > > * SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM xSeries 335(512MB RAM)and IBM HS20 Blades > 8843 41U) > * Builds and boots without problems > * Ran xm-test on all boxes > > ISSUES: > * Bugzilla Bug 677 - xm-test failure: REASON: [Errno 5] Input/output > error > > ISSUES: > > x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 IBM HS20 Blades 8843 41U) > > * Builds and boots without problems > * Ran xm-test on all boxes > > ISSUES: > > XM-TEST Results: > Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL | > ---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+ > hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 | 107 | 10 | 0 | 3 | > hs20.rhel4-x86_32 | 70 | 47*| 0 | 3 | > x335fc4 | 90 | 27*| 0 | 3 | > x335sles9 | 71 | 45*| 0 | 3 | > > * Problem in xm-test > >-- Regards, David F Barrera Linux Technology Center Systems and Technology Group, IBM "The wisest men follow their own direction. " Euripides _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
June 23, 2006, using xen-unstable changeset:
changeset: 10470:411a3c01bb40
tag: tip
user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date: Tue Jun 20 12:51:46 2006 +0100
summary: [XEN] Xen always relinquishes VGA console to domain0 when domain0
x86_32 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM xSeries 335(512MB RAM)and IBM HS20 Blades 8843
41U)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
x86_64 (SLES 9 IBM HS20 Blades 8843 41U)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
XM-TEST Results *:
Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 | 107 | 10 | 0 | 3 |
hs20.rhel4-x86_32 | 92 | 20 | 0 | 3 |
x235sles9 | 101 | 10 | 0 | 3 |
x335fc4 | 101 | 11 | 0 | 3 |
x335sles9 | 100 | 11 | 0 | 3 |
* With Harry''s patch
--
Regards,
David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM
"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
Euripides
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
June 26, 2006, using xen-unstable changeset:
changeset: 10482:9ec0b4f10b4f
tag: tip
user: emellor@leeni.uk.xensource.com
date: Sat Jun 24 17:44:18 2006 +0100
summary: Some fine-tuning in the virtual TPM scripts for hotpluging. The
changes
x86_32 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM xSeries 335(512MB RAM)and IBM HS20 Blades 8843
41U)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
x86_64 (SLES 9 IBM HS20 Blades 8843 41U)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
XM-TEST Results:
Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 | 107 | 5 | 0 | 3 |
x335fc4 | 105 | 7 | 0 | 3 |
x335sles9 | 106 | 5 | 0 | 3 |
--
Regards,
David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM
"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
Euripides
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
June 27, 2006, using xen-unstable changeset:
changeset: 10487:9158ecb9045f
tag: tip
user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date: Tue Jun 27 03:54:05 2006 +0100
summary: [HVM][VMX] On a VMEXIT, ''dirty'' the DR. Restore
DR from vcpu struct,
x86_32 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM xSeries 335(512MB RAM)and IBM HS20 Blades 8843
41U)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
x86_64 (SLES 9 IBM HS20 Blades 8843 41U)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
XM-TEST Results:
Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
hs20.sles9-x86_64 | 106 | 6 | 0 | 3 |
x335fc4 | 105 | 7 | 0 | 3 |
x335sles9 | 106 | 5 | 0 | 3 |
--
Regards,
David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM
"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
Euripides
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
June 28, 2006, using xen-unstable changeset:
changeset: 10508:1da8f53ce65b
tag: tip
user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date: Tue Jun 27 12:24:08 2006 +0100
summary: [LINUX] Fix a few compile warnings and memory leaks in the sysfs
driver.
x86_32 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM xSeries 335(512MB RAM)and IBM HS20 Blades 8843
41U)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
x86_64 (SLES 9 IBM HS20 Blades 8843 41U)
* Builds and boots without problems
* Ran xm-test on all boxes
ISSUES:
XM-TEST Results:
Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
hs20.sles9-x86_64 | 106 | 6 | 0 | 3 |
x335fc4 | 106 | 6 | 0 | 3 |
x335sles9 | 104 | 7 | 0 | 3 |
--
Regards,
David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM
"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
Euripides
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Blocked by Bugzilla Bug #692. Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
at 000000000000004c RIP:
<ffffffff8018ad91>{d_delete+33}
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=692
The problem is occurring when running xm-test, specifically the block-create set
of test cases, of both SLES 9 and RHEL/FC4 boxes.
changeset: 10520:ae245d35457b
tag: tip
user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date: Wed Jun 28 07:59:29 2006 +0100
summary: [HVM][Firmware] Make the creation of MP tables more dynamic
bl2-1 login: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
000000000000004c RIP:
<ffffffff8018ad91>{d_delete+33}
PGD 1c51c067 PUD ec07067 PMD 0
Oops: 0000 [1] SMP
CPU 3
Modules linked in: bridge usbserial parport_pc lp parport sg st sr_mod ide_cd
cdrom joydev thermal processor fan button battery ac ipv6 usbhid i2c_i801
i2c_core e752x_edac edac_mc uhci_hcd tg3 usbcore dm_mod piix ext3 jbd sd_mod
Pid: 20, comm: xenwatch Not tainted 2.6.16.13-xen #1
RIP: e030:[<ffffffff8018ad91>] <ffffffff8018ad91>{d_delete+33}
RSP: e02b:ffff88001f171d18 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88000e04a7c8 RCX: ffff88001d5aec10
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00002fe7dbae1026 RDI: ffff88000e04a7d0
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000073 R09: 00002fe7dbae1026
R10: 0000000000007ff0 R11: ffff88001cca1048 R12: ffff88001d5aebb0
R13: ffff88000e04a7c8 R14: ffff880000a81d98 R15: ffffffff80141652
FS: 00002b133c86cbc0(0000) GS:ffffffff80487180(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: e033 DS: 0000 ES: 0000
Process xenwatch (pid: 20, threadinfo ffff88001f170000, task ffff88000096e8a0)
Stack: 0000000000000000 ffff88000e04a7c8 ffffffff803d3b40 ffffffff801b25ba
00002fe7dbae1026 ffff88000e04a7c8 ffffffff803d3b40 ffff88001cca1000
00000000fffffffc ffffffff801b2fa5
Call Trace: <ffffffff801b25ba>{remove_dir+68}
<ffffffff801\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\ud455\u0665\uffff\uffff}\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\ud455\u0665\uffff\uffff}\u0579\u0255\uffff\uffff\uffff\u0455\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\u027d\uffff\u0455\uffff\uffff}\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\u0461\uffff\u0255\uffff\uffff}\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\u1579\u0745\u044d\uffff}\u0461\u0255\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\u1579\u0745\u044d\uffff}\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff}\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\u1579\u0745\u044d\uffff}\u0461\u0255\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\u047d\u0255\uffff\uffff\u0655}\u0745\uffff\uffff}\uffff\u0579\uffff\u0465\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\u0655\uffff\u0451}\uffff\u0255\uffff\u0455}\uffff\u0461\u0255\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\u047d\u0255\uffff\uffff\u0655}\u0745\uffff\uffff}\uffff\u0579\uffff\u0465\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\u0655\uffff\u0451}\uffff\u0255\uffff\u0455}\uffff\u0461\u0255\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\u1579\u0745\u044d\uffff}\u0461\u0255\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\u0461\u0255\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\ud361\uffff\uffff\uffff}\u0265\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\u0655\uffff\u0451}\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffffI%A\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff}\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\u0455\uffffIMA\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff<3>BUG:
soft lockup detected on CPU#2!
CPU 2:
Modules linked in: bridge usbserial parport_pc lp parport sg st sr_mod ide_cd
cdrom joydev thermal processor fan button battery ac ipv6 usbhid i2c_i801
i2c_core e752x_edac edac_mc uhci_hcd tg3 usbcore dm_mod piix ext3 jbd sd_mod
Pid: 13905, comm: trivial-rewrite Not tainted 2.6.16.13-xen #1
RIP: e030:[<ffffffff8032c326>]
<ffffffff8032c326>{.text.lock.spinlock+25}
RSP: e02b:ffff88000ab1de10 EFLAGS: 00000286
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88000416b9e0 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff80499680 RDI: ffffffff80499680
RBP: ffffffff80499680 R08: ffff8800010cb268 R09: ffff880001000000
R10: 0000000000007ff0 R11: ffff8800015655d8 R12: ffff88001ab649b8
R13: ffff88001ab649b8 R14: ffff8800007382c0 R15: ffff88000416b9e0
FS: 00002b79cbb4e960(0000) GS:ffffffff80487100(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: e033 DS: 0000 ES: 0000
Call Trace: <ffffffff802051fd>{_atomic_dec_and_lock+57}
<ffffffff8018b3f2>{dput+42} <ffffffff8017683d>{__fput+337}
<ffffffff801648d4>{remove_vma+59}
<ffffffff801649bd>{exit_mmap+211}
<ffffffff8012aefc>{mmput+37} <ffffffff80130ea8>{do_exit+520}
<ffffffff80131620>{sys_exit_group+0}
<ffffffff8010ae56>{system_call+134}
<ffffffff8010add0>{system_call+0}
BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
CPU 0:
Modules linked in: bridge usbserial parport_pc lp parport sg st sr_mod ide_cd
cdrom joydev thermal processor fan button battery ac ipv6 usbhid i2c_i801
i2c_core e752x_edac edac_mc uhci_hcd tg3 usbcore dm_mod piix ext3 jbd sd_mod
Pid: 14641, comm: xenstored Not tainted 2.6.16.13-xen #1
RIP: e030:[<ffffffff8032c323>]
<ffffffff8032c323>{.text.lock.spinlock+22}
RSP: e02b:ffff88001bd51dc0 EFLAGS: 00000286
RAX: ffffffff803b94e0 RBX: ffff880007c66a20 RCX: 0000000000000037
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff880007c66a20 RDI: ffffffff80499680
RBP: ffff880007c66ae8 R08: ffffffff801b72aa R09: 7efefefefefefeff
R10: 7efefefefefefeff R11: ffff8800047ff458 R12: ffff880007c66a20
R13: ffff880007c66ae8 R14: ffff88001e4a8d28 R15: ffff88001e4a8d28
FS: 00002aceb17ed0a0(0000) GS:ffffffff80487000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: e033 DS: 0000 ES: 0000
Call Trace: <ffffffff8018aa61>{d_move+46}
<ffffffff80183198>{vfs_rename+775}
<ffffffff801856be>{sys_renameat+393} <ffffffff80176267>{sBUG:
soft lockup detected on CPU#1!
CPU 1:
Modules linked in: bridge usbserial parport_pc lp parport sg st sr_mod ide_cd
cdrom joydev thermal processor fan button battery ac ipv6 usbhid i2c_i801
i2c_core e752x_edac edac_mc uhci_hcd tg3 usbcore dm_mod piix ext3 jbd sd_mod
Pid: 1903, comm: irqbalance Not tainted 2.6.16.13-xen #1
RIP: e030:[<ffffffff8032c326>]
<ffffffff8032c326>{.text.lock.spinlock+25}
RSP: e02b:ffff88001aaa5c70 EFLAGS: 00000286
RAX: ffff880000ad0c00 RBX: ffff88000e04aae8 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: ffff88000e04ab8c RSI: ffff880011ad4010 RDI: ffffffff80499680
RBP: ffff880000de4918 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffffffff578040
R10: ffff880000549998 R11: ffffffffff578040 R12: ffff88001aaa5cf8
R13: ffff880000acfd58 R14: ffff88001aaa5ec8 R15: ffff88001aaa5cf8
FS: 00002b36d77756e0(0000) GS:ffffffff80487080(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: e033 DS: 0000 ES: 0000
Call Trace: <ffffffff8018b2df>{d_alloc+346}
<ffffffff8018233f>{do_lookup+166}
<ffffffff801840a0>{__link_path_walk+2467}
<ffffffff8018459d>{link_path_walk+78}
<ffffffff80173f25>{get_unused_\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\ud47d}\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff}\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\ud755\uffff}\u0579\uffff\u0355\uffff}\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\ud47d}\uffff\uffff\uffff}\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\u0455\uffff}\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\u0455\uffff}\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffff\uffffUG:
soft lockup detected on CPU#3!
CPU 3:
Modules linked in: bridge usbserial parport_pc lp parport sg st sr_mod ide_cd
cdrom joydev thermal processor fan button battery ac ipv6 usbhid i2c_i801
i2c_core e752x_edac edac_mc uhci_hcd tg3 usbcore dm_mod piix ext3 jbd sd_mod
Pid: 20, comm: xenwatch Not tainted 2.6.16.13-xen #1
RIP: e030:[<ffffffff8032c326>]
<ffffffff8032c326>{.text.lock.spinlock+25}
RSP: e02b:ffff88001f171ae0 EFLAGS: 00000286
RAX: ffffffff803a4840 RBX: ffff88001caea3a0 RCX: ffff88001f171b38
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffff80499680
RBP: ffff88000096e8a0 R08: ffff880000aa60d0 R09: ffff88001f175cf0
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffff8800018fbdc0 R12: 0000000000000020
R13: ffff8800009f0760 R14: ffff88000096e948 R15: ffff88001f171b38
FS: 00002b133c86cbc0(0000) GS:ffffffff80487180(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: e033 DS: 0000 ES: 0000
Call Trace: <ffffffff801ab982>{proc_pid_unhash+25}
<ffffffff8012ff3e>{release_task+41}
<ffffffff80131502>{do_exit+2146}
<ffffffff80119415>{do_paffffffff8026ff3e>{xenbus_dev_remove+44}
<ffffffff80262bb4>{__device_release_driver+112}
<ffffffff80262cf0>{device_release_driver+45}
<ffffffff80262453>{bus_remove_device+160}
<ffffffff80261590>{device_del+67}
<ffffffff802615d1>{device_unregister+9}
<ffffffff80272603>{frontend_changed+244}
<ffffffff8026f824>{otherend_changed+87}
<ffffffff8026e2c4>{xenwatch_thread+0}
<ffffffff8026e291>{xenwatch_handle_callback+21}
<ffffffff8026e408>{xenwatch_thread+324}
peth1: received packet with own address as source address
--
Regards,
David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM
"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
Euripides
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On 30 Jun 2006, at 14:31, David F Barrera wrote:> Blocked by Bugzilla Bug #692. Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer > dereference at 000000000000004c RIP: > <ffffffff8018ad91>{d_delete+33} > > http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=692 > > The problem is occurring when running xm-test, specifically the > block-create set of test cases, of both SLES 9 and RHEL/FC4 boxes. >Fixed by changeset 10568 which should be pushed to the public tree shortly. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel