Daniel Stekloff
2006-Apr-28 16:20 UTC
[Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-changelog] Revert the xm-test ramdisk patch until we build new initrds.
Hi, Perhaps I was wrong to increment the xm-test version as I did, maybe a minor version change was all that was needed. The functionality really didn''t change for the ramdisk. Shall I redo with 0.7.1? Thanks, Dan On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 16:14 +0000, Xen patchbot -unstable wrote:> # HG changeset patch > # User kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk > # Node ID 59161a85a281d9efda82c6da3c9d463f91b86deb > # Parent 3726c0afc5af3d0812ff95dcdd688f0c45af0a14 > Revert the xm-test ramdisk patch until we build new initrds. > Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xensource.com> > > diff -r 3726c0afc5af -r 59161a85a281 tools/xm-test/configure.ac > --- a/tools/xm-test/configure.ac Fri Apr 28 14:27:38 2006 +0100 > +++ b/tools/xm-test/configure.ac Fri Apr 28 14:31:47 2006 +0100 > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > # xm-test configure.ac input script > > # Basic header information > -AC_INIT([xm-test], [0.8.0]) > +AC_INIT([xm-test], [0.7.0]) > AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([1.7 foreign]) > > # Check for dependencies > diff -r 3726c0afc5af -r 59161a85a281 tools/xm-test/ramdisk/Makefile.am > --- a/tools/xm-test/ramdisk/Makefile.am Fri Apr 28 14:27:38 2006 +0100 > +++ b/tools/xm-test/ramdisk/Makefile.am Fri Apr 28 14:31:47 2006 +0100 > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ INITRD ?= http://xm-test.xensource.com/r > > EXTRA_DIST = skel configs patches > > -BR_TAR = buildroot-20060427.tar.bz2 > +BR_TAR = buildroot-20060215.tar.bz2 > BR_URL = http://buildroot.uclibc.org/downloads/snapshots/$(BR_TAR) > #BR_URL = http://buildroot.uclibc.org/downloads/snapshots/buildroot-snapshot.tar.bz2 > BR_SRC = buildroot > diff -r 3726c0afc5af -r 59161a85a281 tools/xm-test/ramdisk/configs/buildroot > --- a/tools/xm-test/ramdisk/configs/buildroot Fri Apr 28 14:27:38 2006 +0100 > +++ b/tools/xm-test/ramdisk/configs/buildroot Fri Apr 28 14:31:47 2006 +0100 > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ BR2_i386=y > # BR2_sh is not set > # BR2_sparc is not set > # BR2_x86_64 is not set > -BR2_x86_i386=y > +BR2_x86_i386=y > # BR2_x86_i486 is not set > # BR2_x86_i586 is not set > # BR2_x86_i686 is not set > @@ -69,34 +69,29 @@ BR2_PTHREADS_OLD=y > # BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_15 is not set > # BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_15_94_0_2_2 is not set > # BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_15_97 is not set > -# BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_16_1 is not set > +BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_16_1=y > # BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_16_90_0_3 is not set > # BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_16_91_0_3 is not set > # BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_16_91_0_4 is not set > # BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_16_91_0_5 is not set > # BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_16_91_0_6 is not set > -BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_16_91_0_7=y > -BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION="2.16.91.0.7" > -BR2_EXTRA_BINUTILS_CONFIG_OPTIONS="" > +BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION="2.16.1" > > # > # Gcc Options > # > # BR2_GCC_VERSION_3_3_5 is not set > # BR2_GCC_VERSION_3_3_6 is not set > -# BR2_GCC_VERSION_3_4_2 is not set > +BR2_GCC_VERSION_3_4_2=y > # BR2_GCC_VERSION_3_4_3 is not set > # BR2_GCC_VERSION_3_4_4 is not set > # BR2_GCC_VERSION_3_4_5 is not set > -BR2_GCC_VERSION_3_4_6=y > # BR2_GCC_VERSION_4_0_0 is not set > # BR2_GCC_VERSION_4_0_1 is not set > # BR2_GCC_VERSION_4_0_2 is not set > -# BR2_GCC_VERSION_4_0_3 is not set > # BR2_GCC_VERSION_4_1_0 is not set > -# BR2_GCC_VERSION_4_2 is not set > -# BR2_GCC_IS_SNAP is not set > -BR2_GCC_VERSION="3.4.6" > +# BR2_GCC_VERSION_4_2_0 is not set > +BR2_GCC_VERSION="3.4.2" > # BR2_GCC_USE_SJLJ_EXCEPTIONS is not set > BR2_EXTRA_GCC_CONFIG_OPTIONS="" > # BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP is not set > @@ -112,7 +107,7 @@ BR2_CCACHE=y > # > # BR2_PACKAGE_GDB is not set > # BR2_PACKAGE_GDB_SERVER is not set > -# BR2_PACKAGE_GDB_HOST is not set > +# BR2_PACKAGE_GDB_CLIENT is not set > > # > # elf2flt > @@ -181,7 +176,6 @@ BR2_PACKAGE_BUSYBOX_CONFIG="package/busy > # BR2_PACKAGE_DM is not set > # BR2_PACKAGE_DNSMASQ is not set > # BR2_PACKAGE_DROPBEAR is not set > -# BR2_PACKAGE_ETHTOOL is not set > # BR2_PACKAGE_EXPAT is not set > # BR2_PACKAGE_E2FSPROGS is not set > # BR2_PACKAGE_FAKEROOT is not set > @@ -190,7 +184,6 @@ BR2_PACKAGE_BUSYBOX_CONFIG="package/busy > # BR2_PACKAGE_GETTEXT is not set > # BR2_PACKAGE_LIBINTL is not set > # BR2_PACKAGE_GZIP is not set > -# BR2_PACKAGE_HASERL is not set > # BR2_PACKAGE_HOSTAP is not set > # BR2_PACKAGE_HOTPLUG is not set > # BR2_PACKAGE_IOSTAT is not set > @@ -260,7 +253,6 @@ BR2_QTE_TMAKE_VERSION="1.13" > # BR2_PACKAGE_SMARTMONTOOLS is not set > # BR2_PACKAGE_SOCAT is not set > # BR2_PACKAGE_STRACE is not set > -# BR2_PACKAGE_SUDO is not set > # BR2_PACKAGE_SYSKLOGD is not set > # BR2_PACKAGE_SYSVINIT is not set > # BR2_PACKAGE_TCL is not set > @@ -273,7 +265,6 @@ BR2_QTE_TMAKE_VERSION="1.13" > # BR2_PACKAGE_TTCP is not set > # BR2_PACKAGE_UDEV is not set > # BR2_PACKAGE_UDHCP is not set > -# BR2_PACKAGE_UEMACS is not set > # BR2_PACKAGE_USBUTILS is not set > # BR2_PACKAGE_UTIL-LINUX is not set > # BR2_PACKAGE_VALGRIND is not set > @@ -307,7 +298,6 @@ BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_EXT2_COPYTO="" > # BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_JFFS2 is not set > # BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_SQUASHFS is not set > # BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_TAR is not set > -# BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_ISO9660 is not set > > # > # bootloader for target device > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-changelog mailing list > Xen-changelog@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-changelog_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Ewan Mellor
2006-Apr-28 17:16 UTC
[Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-changelog] Revert the xm-test ramdisk patch until we build new initrds.
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 09:20:04AM -0700, Daniel Stekloff wrote:> > Hi, > > Perhaps I was wrong to increment the xm-test version as I did, maybe a > minor version change was all that was needed. The functionality really > didn''t change for the ramdisk. > > Shall I redo with 0.7.1?Maybe. Are you sure that they are compatible? If so, then yes, 0.7.1 would be much better. The main reason we reverted it is that XenSource UK move into shiny new offices this weekend -- this will literally be the last email I send before my computer goes into a crate -- so there''s no time to get the ramdisk done in the next few days. If you think that 0.7.1 is correct, then yes, let''s go with that. Ewan. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Daniel Stekloff
2006-Apr-28 22:07 UTC
[Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-changelog] Revert the xm-test ramdisk patch until we build new initrds.
On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 18:16 +0100, Ewan Mellor wrote:> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 09:20:04AM -0700, Daniel Stekloff wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > Perhaps I was wrong to increment the xm-test version as I did, maybe a > > minor version change was all that was needed. The functionality really > > didn''t change for the ramdisk. > > > > Shall I redo with 0.7.1? > > Maybe. Are you sure that they are compatible? If so, then yes, 0.7.1 would > be much better.Yep... I swapped the 0.7.1 with the current 0.7.0 and xm-test behaved as expected. I really think the minor release is the way to go.> The main reason we reverted it is that XenSource UK move into shiny new > offices this weekend -- this will literally be the last email I send before my > computer goes into a crate -- so there''s no time to get the ramdisk done in > the next few days. If you think that 0.7.1 is correct, then yes, let''s go > with that.Nice! No rush on the patch. Dan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel