thr3ads.net - Xen devel - [Xen-devel] gdbserver-xen x86_64 paravirt guest debugging [Apr 2006]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Ryan Harper

2006-Apr-19 22:09 UTC

[Xen-devel] gdbserver-xen x86_64 paravirt guest debugging

I''ve attempted to debug live x86_64 domU domains with little success.
gdbserver-xen segfaults and I''ve starting running gdb on gdbserver-xen
to see where things are going south.

I kick off the server under gdb, and then run gdb client and remote
attach.  This appears to succeed, and gives me:

[New Thread 0]
[Switching to Thread 0]
0xffffffff8014e258 in softlockup_tick (regs=0xffff880026c6fcd8) at
kernel/softlockup.c:50
50              unsigned long timestamp = per_cpu(timestamp, this_cpu);

But when I ask for a backtrace:

(gdb) bt
#0  0xffffffff8014e258 in softlockup_tick (regs=0xffff880026c6fcd8) at
kernel/softlockup.c:50
Ignoring packet error, continuing...
Reply contains invalid hex digit 116


On the other side (gdbserver-xen) I see:

(gdb) run
The program being debugged has been started already.
Start it from the beginning? (y or n) y

Starting program:
/home/rharper/work/openhype/xen/unstable/hg/d/tools/debugger/gdb/gdb-6.2.1-linux-x86_64-xen/gdb/gdbserver/gdbserver-xen
127.0.0.1:9999 --attach 1
domain currently paused
Attached; pid = 1
Listening on port 9999
Remote debugging from host 127.0.0.1

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00002b2611bf410a in map_domain_va_64 (xc_handle=7, cpu=0,
guest_va=0xffffffff80364ed0,
    perm=1) at xc_ptrace.c:295
295         l3p = page_array[l3p];

Some inspection:

(gdb) p l3p
$4 = 796261
(gdb) p nr_pages
$5 = 196608

page_array only has 196k entries AFAICT, so this seems problematic.

Anyone have x86_64 paravirt guest debugging working on latest unstable?

-- 
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
(512) 838-9253   T/L: 678-9253
ryanh@us.ibm.com

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Kamble, Nitin A

2006-Apr-19 22:16 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] gdbserver-xen x86_64 paravirt guest debugging

Hi Ryan,
  I am writing a paper for debugging Linux kernel using the Xen and the
gdbserver. So with that you will get more details.

  For the quick solution for your problem, you need to run "set
architecture i386:x86-64:intel" command in the gdb before attaching.

Thanks & Regards,
Nitin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
Open Source Technology Center, Intel Corp
>-----Original Message-----
>From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-devel-
>bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Ryan Harper
>Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 3:10 PM
>To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>Subject: [Xen-devel] gdbserver-xen x86_64 paravirt guest debugging
>
>I''ve attempted to debug live x86_64 domU domains with little
success.
>gdbserver-xen segfaults and I''ve starting running gdb on
gdbserver-xen
>to see where things are going south.
>
>I kick off the server under gdb, and then run gdb client and remote
>attach.  This appears to succeed, and gives me:
>
>[New Thread 0]
>[Switching to Thread 0]
>0xffffffff8014e258 in softlockup_tick (regs=0xffff880026c6fcd8) at
>kernel/softlockup.c:50
>50              unsigned long timestamp = per_cpu(timestamp, this_cpu);
>
>But when I ask for a backtrace:
>
>(gdb) bt
>#0  0xffffffff8014e258 in softlockup_tick (regs=0xffff880026c6fcd8) at
>kernel/softlockup.c:50
>Ignoring packet error, continuing...
>Reply contains invalid hex digit 116
>
>
>On the other side (gdbserver-xen) I see:
>
>(gdb) run
>The program being debugged has been started already.
>Start it from the beginning? (y or n) y
>
>Starting program:
>/home/rharper/work/openhype/xen/unstable/hg/d/tools/debugger/gdb/gdb-6.
2.1->linux-x86_64-xen/gdb/gdbserver/gdbserver-xen 127.0.0.1:9999 --attach 1
>domain currently paused
>Attached; pid = 1
>Listening on port 9999
>Remote debugging from host 127.0.0.1
>
>Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>0x00002b2611bf410a in map_domain_va_64 (xc_handle=7, cpu=0,
>guest_va=0xffffffff80364ed0,
>    perm=1) at xc_ptrace.c:295
>295         l3p = page_array[l3p];
>
>Some inspection:
>
>(gdb) p l3p
>$4 = 796261
>(gdb) p nr_pages
>$5 = 196608
>
>page_array only has 196k entries AFAICT, so this seems problematic.
>
>Anyone have x86_64 paravirt guest debugging working on latest unstable?
>
>--
>Ryan Harper
>Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
>IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
>(512) 838-9253   T/L: 678-9253
>ryanh@us.ibm.com
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-devel mailing list
>Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Ryan Harper

2006-Apr-20 14:31 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] gdbserver-xen x86_64 paravirt guest debugging

* Kamble, Nitin A <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com> [2006-04-19
17:17]:> Hi Ryan,
>   I am writing a paper for debugging Linux kernel using the Xen and the
> gdbserver. So with that you will get more details.
> 
>   For the quick solution for your problem, you need to run "set
> architecture i386:x86-64:intel" command in the gdb before attaching.
Thanks for the response, I''ll give that a try.  What exactly does that
command do? 

-- 
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
(512) 838-9253   T/L: 678-9253
ryanh@us.ibm.com

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Ryan Harper

2006-Apr-20 22:23 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] gdbserver-xen x86_64 paravirt guest debugging

* Kamble, Nitin A <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com> [2006-04-19
17:17]:> Hi Ryan,
>   I am writing a paper for debugging Linux kernel using the Xen and the
> gdbserver. So with that you will get more details.
> 
>   For the quick solution for your problem, you need to run "set
> architecture i386:x86-64:intel" command in the gdb before attaching.
This didn''t help at all, but thank you for the suggestion.

I''m not sure if anyone has tried to get debugging of paravirtual x86_64
guests to work.  I encountered several issues along the way to getting a
successful ''bt'' from gdb on a live x86_64 domU.  Note, this is
not a hvm
domain I am debugging.

The first issue was the paging_enabled check on
tools/libxc/xc_ptrace.c:384

if (!paging_enabled(&ctxt[cpu])) {
        static void * v;
        unsigned long page;

        if ( v != NULL )
            munmap(v, PAGE_SIZE);

        page = page_array[va >> PAGE_SHIFT] << PAGE_SHIFT;

Specifically, the va >> PAGE_SHIFT was too large for the page_array of
pfn-to-mfns.  Examining cr0 (ctxt->ctrlreg[0]) in gdb showed that cr0
was 0x00000008.  Any reason why cr0 wouldn''t at least have paging and
protected mode bits set for paravirtual guests?

I hacked up xc_linux_build.c and
linux-2.6-xen-sparse/drivers/xen/core/smpboot.c to set paging and
protected bits in cr0 and I made it further.  Next stop was at
xc_ptrace.c:284

#ifdef __x86_64__
static void *
map_domain_va_64(
    int xc_handle,
    int cpu,
    void *guest_va,
    int perm)
{
    unsigned long l3p, l2p, l1p, l1e, p, va = (unsigned long)guest_va;
    uint64_t *l4, *l3, *l2, *l1;
    static void *v;

    if ((ctxt[cpu].ctrlreg[4] & 0x20) == 0 ) /* legacy ia32 mode */
        return map_domain_va_32(xc_handle, cpu, guest_va, perm);

cr4''s value was 0, which forced me down the map_domain_va_32, which was
not the right path since I''m on a 64-bit guest.  Commenting that
check out, I then blew up processing the page table pointers,
xc_ptrace.c:292 

    l4 = xc_map_foreign_range( xc_handle, current_domid, PAGE_SIZE,
            PROT_READ, ctxt[cpu].ctrlreg[3] >> PAGE_SHIFT);
    if ( l4 == NULL )
        return NULL;

    l3p = l4[l4_table_offset(va)] >> PAGE_SHIFT;
    l3p = page_array[l3p]; // lineno 292


In a paravirt domain, the entries in the l4 page table are going to be
mfns, not gpfns, in which case, we don''t need to try to convert the
entries in the l4 table into mfns via the page_array pfn list.  The same
holds true for the rest of the tables.

I removed all page_array index lines and I was finally able to get a
backtrace of the guest.  

(gdb) bt
#0  0xffffffff801348d5 in do_timer (regs=0xffff88002ea4bf58) at
kernel/timer.c:775
#1  0xffffffff8010f31b in timer_interrupt (irq=782548824,
      dev_id=0x989680, regs=0xffff88002ea4bf58)
    at arch/x86_64/kernel/../../i386/kernel/time-xen.c:672
#2  0xffffffff8014e5b9 in handle_IRQ_event (irq=256,
      regs=0xffff88002ea4bf58, action=0xffff880001dfe600)
    at kernel/irq/handle.c:88
#3  0xffffffff8014e6b2 in __do_IRQ (irq=256, regs=0xffff88002ea4bf58) at
    kernel/irq/handle.c:173
#4  0xffffffff8010d6ae in do_IRQ (regs=0xffff88002ea4bf58) at
    arch/x86_64/kernel/irq-xen.c:105
#5  0xffffffff80249c50 in evtchn_do_upcall (regs=0xffff88002ea4bf58) at
    drivers/xen/core/evtchn.c:215
#6  0xffffffff8010b87e in do_hypervisor_callback ()
#7  0xffff88002ea4bf58 in ?? ()
#8  0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()


My guess is that those conversions are needed if the guest is in shadow
paging mode.  If so, then we need to add a shadow and non-shadow mode to
the map_domain_va_64() call so we can debug non-hvm 64-bit guests via
gdb.

-- 
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
(512) 838-9253   T/L: 678-9253
ryanh@us.ibm.com

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Kamble, Nitin A

2006-Apr-20 23:53 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] gdbserver-xen x86_64 paravirt guest debugging

Hi Ryan,
   You are right. It is needed for fully virtualized (HVM) Guests. And I
incorrectly thought that you are running HVM domain. I did not try
64-bit para-virtualized domain debug with the gdbserver. And your debug
findings of make sense to me. I think the map_domain_va functions and CR
registers need to more code to support the para-virtualized domains.

Thanks & Regards,
Nitin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
Open Source Technology Center, Intel Corp
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ryan Harper [mailto:ryanh@us.ibm.com]
>Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 3:24 PM
>To: Kamble, Nitin A
>Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] gdbserver-xen x86_64 paravirt guest debugging
>
>* Kamble, Nitin A <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com> [2006-04-19 17:17]:
>> Hi Ryan,
>>   I am writing a paper for debugging Linux kernel using the Xen and
the>> gdbserver. So with that you will get more details.
>>
>>   For the quick solution for your problem, you need to run "set
>> architecture i386:x86-64:intel" command in the gdb before
attaching.
>
>This didn''t help at all, but thank you for the suggestion.
>
>I''m not sure if anyone has tried to get debugging of paravirtual
x86_64
>guests to work.  I encountered several issues along the way to getting
a>successful ''bt'' from gdb on a live x86_64 domU.  Note,
this is not a
hvm>domain I am debugging.
>
>The first issue was the paging_enabled check on
>tools/libxc/xc_ptrace.c:384
>
>if (!paging_enabled(&ctxt[cpu])) {
>        static void * v;
>        unsigned long page;
>
>        if ( v != NULL )
>            munmap(v, PAGE_SIZE);
>
>        page = page_array[va >> PAGE_SHIFT] << PAGE_SHIFT;
>
>Specifically, the va >> PAGE_SHIFT was too large for the page_array of
>pfn-to-mfns.  Examining cr0 (ctxt->ctrlreg[0]) in gdb showed that cr0
>was 0x00000008.  Any reason why cr0 wouldn''t at least have paging
and
>protected mode bits set for paravirtual guests?
>
>I hacked up xc_linux_build.c and
>linux-2.6-xen-sparse/drivers/xen/core/smpboot.c to set paging and
>protected bits in cr0 and I made it further.  Next stop was at
>xc_ptrace.c:284
>
>#ifdef __x86_64__
>static void *
>map_domain_va_64(
>    int xc_handle,
>    int cpu,
>    void *guest_va,
>    int perm)
>{
>    unsigned long l3p, l2p, l1p, l1e, p, va = (unsigned long)guest_va;
>    uint64_t *l4, *l3, *l2, *l1;
>    static void *v;
>
>    if ((ctxt[cpu].ctrlreg[4] & 0x20) == 0 ) /* legacy ia32 mode */
>        return map_domain_va_32(xc_handle, cpu, guest_va, perm);
>
>cr4''s value was 0, which forced me down the map_domain_va_32, which
was
>not the right path since I''m on a 64-bit guest.  Commenting that
>check out, I then blew up processing the page table pointers,
>xc_ptrace.c:292
>
>    l4 = xc_map_foreign_range( xc_handle, current_domid, PAGE_SIZE,
>            PROT_READ, ctxt[cpu].ctrlreg[3] >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>    if ( l4 == NULL )
>        return NULL;
>
>    l3p = l4[l4_table_offset(va)] >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>    l3p = page_array[l3p]; // lineno 292
>
>
>In a paravirt domain, the entries in the l4 page table are going to be
>mfns, not gpfns, in which case, we don''t need to try to convert the
>entries in the l4 table into mfns via the page_array pfn list.  The
same>holds true for the rest of the tables.
>
>I removed all page_array index lines and I was finally able to get a
>backtrace of the guest.
>
>(gdb) bt
>#0  0xffffffff801348d5 in do_timer (regs=0xffff88002ea4bf58) at
>kernel/timer.c:775
>#1  0xffffffff8010f31b in timer_interrupt (irq=782548824,
>      dev_id=0x989680, regs=0xffff88002ea4bf58)
>    at arch/x86_64/kernel/../../i386/kernel/time-xen.c:672
>#2  0xffffffff8014e5b9 in handle_IRQ_event (irq=256,
>      regs=0xffff88002ea4bf58, action=0xffff880001dfe600)
>    at kernel/irq/handle.c:88
>#3  0xffffffff8014e6b2 in __do_IRQ (irq=256, regs=0xffff88002ea4bf58)
at>    kernel/irq/handle.c:173
>#4  0xffffffff8010d6ae in do_IRQ (regs=0xffff88002ea4bf58) at
>    arch/x86_64/kernel/irq-xen.c:105
>#5  0xffffffff80249c50 in evtchn_do_upcall (regs=0xffff88002ea4bf58) at
>    drivers/xen/core/evtchn.c:215
>#6  0xffffffff8010b87e in do_hypervisor_callback ()
>#7  0xffff88002ea4bf58 in ?? ()
>#8  0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
>
>
>My guess is that those conversions are needed if the guest is in shadow
>paging mode.  If so, then we need to add a shadow and non-shadow mode
to>the map_domain_va_64() call so we can debug non-hvm 64-bit guests via
>gdb.
>
>--
>Ryan Harper
>Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
>IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
>(512) 838-9253   T/L: 678-9253
>ryanh@us.ibm.com
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Xen devel - Apr 2006 - gdbserver-xen x86_64 paravirt guest debugging

[Xen-devel] gdbserver-xen x86_64 paravirt guest debugging

RE: [Xen-devel] gdbserver-xen x86_64 paravirt guest debugging

Re: [Xen-devel] gdbserver-xen x86_64 paravirt guest debugging

Re: [Xen-devel] gdbserver-xen x86_64 paravirt guest debugging

RE: [Xen-devel] gdbserver-xen x86_64 paravirt guest debugging