Xen devel - Apr 2006 - Strange behavior of simple loop programs in Xen guests.

Hi,

I''m running some simple C programs in a Xen 3.0 guest. I have a program
testprog.c containing simple nested loops (see code below).
I run this program and check "sar" and "top" output inside
the guest and
also xentop on the host. It shows that the running program
takes up almost all the CPU time as expected.

Now I introduce a sleep(1) statement inside my outer loop. On running the
modified program, both "sar" and "top" in the guest VM show
0% and
xentop on the host shows about 0.5%
Next I start about a 100 instances of my loop program (started at skewed
times) inside the guest VM. A check on sar and top still shows 0% CPU,
however a check on xentop on the host shows an increase in CPU usage for the
guest. This changes with the number of instances of the loop program
I start (more or less linearly).

I don''t understand why this is happening. Why are sar and top showing
incorrect output in the guest VM. Can anyone explain ?

P.S: code for the programs is posted below.

Thanks and regards
Arjun

testprog.c
------------------------------------- nested loops
-----------------------------
main()
{
        long long int i = 0;
        int j = 0, count = 0;

        do{
          i++;

          for(j=0 ; j < 100 ; j++){
            count = count + 1;
          }


       } while (i < 25999999999LL);
}


------------------------------ nested loops with sleep
----------------------
main()
{
        long long int i = 0;
        int j = 0, count = 0;

        do{
          i++;

          for(j=0 ; j < 1000000 ; j++){
            count = count + 1;
          }
          sleep(1);
          count= 0;

       } while (i < 25999999999LL);
}

-------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

You''re experience a well known problem with just about any piece of
virtualization software.

Tools that run in the guest (like sar and top) do not realize that the
guest isn''t always running which means they don''t take this
into account
when calculating percentages.  This makes the output from them pretty much
useless in a virtualized environment.

The IBM zSeries Linux port has some special modifications to take this
trait into account within the kernel so tools like top work like you''d
expect.  I believe someone was looking into doing something like this for
Xen.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 02:57:26 -0400, Arjun wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I''m running some simple C programs in a Xen 3.0 guest. I have a
program
> testprog.c containing simple nested loops (see code below). I run this
> program and check "sar" and "top" output inside the
guest and also xentop
> on the host. It shows that the running program takes up almost all the CPU
> time as expected.
> 
> Now I introduce a sleep(1) statement inside my outer loop. On running the
> modified program, both "sar" and "top" in the guest VM
show 0% and xentop
> on the host shows about 0.5%
> Next I start about a 100 instances of my loop program (started at skewed
> times) inside the guest VM. A check on sar and top still shows 0% CPU,
> however a check on xentop on the host shows an increase in CPU usage for
> the guest. This changes with the number of instances of the loop program I
> start (more or less linearly).
> 
> I don''t understand why this is happening. Why are sar and top
showing
> incorrect output in the guest VM. Can anyone explain ?
> 
> P.S: code for the programs is posted below.
> 
> Thanks and regards
> Arjun
> 


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel