Hi list,
with 2.6.16 FC5 kernel and xen3.0.2 with 2.6.16.5 if I spawn a 256MB
xenU VM and launch ab -n 50000 -c 1000 http://10.0.2.11/small.html I
get the following message in xen0:
irq 16: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
Call Trace: <IRQ> <ffffffff801501f4>{__report_bad_irq+48}
<ffffffff8015040b>{note_interrupt+458}
<ffffffff8014fd40>{__do_IRQ+189}
<ffffffff8010d5c5>{do_IRQ+60}
<ffffffff80254b56>{evtchn_do_upcall+134}
<ffffffff8010b5d6>{do_hypervisor_callback+30} <EOI>
<ffffffff801073aa>{hypercall_page+938}
<ffffffff801073aa>{hypercall_page+938}
<ffffffff80109005>{xen_idle+132}
<ffffffff80109290>{cpu_idle+76}
<ffffffff8010931d>{cpu_idle+217}
<ffffffff804a76f6>{start_kernel+497}
<ffffffff804a70fa>{_sinittext+250}
handlers:
[<ffffffff8028ea7b>] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0x55)
Disabling IRQ #16
Trying with irqpoll is generally worse..a couple of times it became to
print ata timeout errors.
Is it something known ?
thank you,
Michele
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On 13 Apr 2006, at 14:31, Michele wrote:> Trying with irqpoll is generally worse..a couple of times it became to > print ata timeout errors. > Is it something known ?Yes, it''s got a bunch of us scratching our heads. :-( -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel