Ian Pratt
2006-Apr-04 20:06 UTC
RE: [Xen-devel] Does dom0 see all physical processors? (RE:[Xen-ia64-devel] SAL INFO virtualization)
> I understand and sympathize with the need for dom0 to > sometimes get and use information from each processor that is > only available if dom0 is running on each processor. > > However, AFAIK, SMP guests are always gang-scheduled, correct?No, there''s no need to strictly gang schedule, and the current scheduler makes no attempt to do so. It may generally be a decent thing to do, though.> (If not, aren''t there some very knotty research issues > related to locking and forward progress?)You could end up preempting a vCPU holding a lock which could lead to daft behaviour of naïve spin locks. A number of possible workarounds have been prototyped, but since it doesn''t seem to be much of a problem in practice nothing has been checked in.> So on a 16-processor system, every time dom0 needs to run > (e.g. to handle backend I/O for any one of perhaps hundreds > of domains), *every* domain gets descheduled so that dom0 can > be (gang-)scheduled on all 16 processors? > > If true, this sounds like a _horrible_ performance hit, so I > hope I''m misunderstanding something...This isn''t an issue. After booting you probably want dom0 to give up all but 1 vCPU anyway. Ian _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel