Stefan Berger
2006-Mar-14 18:27 UTC
[Xen-devel] [PATCH][xm-test] Repost of tpm driver suspend/resume test
This is a repost of a previously posted patch to test suspend and resume cycles of the TPM front- and backend. Now that sysfs is mounted in the RAM disk of the test environment, the test code does not need to do this anymore. This patch also simplifies previous tests and the APIs used there. Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@us.ibm.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Ewan Mellor
2006-Mar-15 09:58 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][xm-test] Repost of tpm driver suspend/resume test
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:27:59PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:> This is a repost of a previously posted patch to test suspend and resume > cycles of the TPM front- and backend. > Now that sysfs is mounted in the RAM disk of the test environment, the > test code does not need to do this anymore. This patch also simplifies > previous tests and the APIs used there.Woody Marvel and Dan Stekloff still seem to be discussing the best way to detect sysfs capabilities. I presume your patch depends upon Dan''s, and I''ve been holding that off until I get a sysfs-detection patch that everyone''s happy with. Ewan. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Daniel Stekloff
2006-Mar-15 15:14 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][xm-test] Repost of tpm driver suspend/resume test
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 09:58 +0000, Ewan Mellor wrote:> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:27:59PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > > > This is a repost of a previously posted patch to test suspend and resume > > cycles of the TPM front- and backend. > > Now that sysfs is mounted in the RAM disk of the test environment, the > > test code does not need to do this anymore. This patch also simplifies > > previous tests and the APIs used there. > > Woody Marvel and Dan Stekloff still seem to be discussing the best way to > detect sysfs capabilities. I presume your patch depends upon Dan''s, and I''ve > been holding that off until I get a sysfs-detection patch that everyone''s > happy with.Hi Ewan, Please put the sysfs patch in as is, Woody is fine with it. Thanks, Dan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Stefan Berger
2006-Mar-15 15:56 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][xm-test] Repost of tpm driver suspend/resume test
xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com wrote on 03/15/2006 04:58:41 AM:> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:27:59PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > > > This is a repost of a previously posted patch to test suspend andresume> > cycles of the TPM front- and backend. > > Now that sysfs is mounted in the RAM disk of the test environment, the > > test code does not need to do this anymore. This patch also simplifies > > previous tests and the APIs used there. > > Woody Marvel and Dan Stekloff still seem to be discussing the best wayto> detect sysfs capabilities. I presume your patch depends upon Dan''s, andI''ve> been holding that off until I get a sysfs-detection patch thateveryone''s> happy with.Actually, if you haven''t put it in, yet, let me know and I will change the patch to result in a ''SKIP'' if the vtpm_manager process as is not running. Stefan> > Ewan. > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
woody marvel
2006-Mar-15 17:49 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][xm-test] Repost of tpm driver suspend/resume test
Sorry Ewan if there was any mis-communications, the patch is fine. I was probing for greater understanding. Thanks. wm =============On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 07:14 -0800, Daniel Stekloff wrote:> On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 09:58 +0000, Ewan Mellor wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:27:59PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > > > > > This is a repost of a previously posted patch to test suspend and resume > > > cycles of the TPM front- and backend. > > > Now that sysfs is mounted in the RAM disk of the test environment, the > > > test code does not need to do this anymore. This patch also simplifies > > > previous tests and the APIs used there. > > > > Woody Marvel and Dan Stekloff still seem to be discussing the best way to > > detect sysfs capabilities. I presume your patch depends upon Dan''s, and I''ve > > been holding that off until I get a sysfs-detection patch that everyone''s > > happy with. > > > Hi Ewan, > > Please put the sysfs patch in as is, Woody is fine with it. > > Thanks, > > Dan >_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel