This got auto-discarded by mailman, so I''m reposting it. Curt -----Original Message----- From: Nick Kral [mailto:nkral@pinnaclet.com] Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 2:21 PM To: Kevin Smith Cc: Wxruby developers'' list Subject: Ugh Ok, I found the checkbox I forgot to check to make the disk image a proper size. I have a new disk image of wxruby-0.2.1-osx-panther (same code, different file) that is only 1.5 Mb in size. Would you like that, or should I leave it as is? Nikc --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.610 / Virus Database: 390 - Release Date: 3/3/2004 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.610 / Virus Database: 390 - Release Date: 3/3/2004
Nick Kral wrote:> Ok, I found the checkbox I forgot to check to make the disk image a > proper size. I have a new disk image of wxruby-0.2.1-osx-panther (same > code, different file) that is only 1.5 Mb in size. Would you like that, > or should I leave it as is?Hmm. Good question. I would like to put the new file up, but it runs against my desire to have solid processes. We could go to 0.2.2, but that seems silly since nothing else is changing. I think the best would be to post the new file, and update the release notes to mention that we have replaced the original large Mac file with a smaller one that (we believe) has the same content. Sound reasonable? Kevin
Kevin Smith wrote:> > Nick Kral wrote: > > Ok, I found the checkbox I forgot to check to make the disk image a > > proper size. I have a new disk image of wxruby-0.2.1-osx-panther (same > > code, different file) that is only 1.5 Mb in size. Would you like that, > > or should I leave it as is? > > Hmm. Good question. I would like to put the new file up, but it runs > against my desire to have solid processes. We could go to 0.2.2, but > that seems silly since nothing else is changing. > > I think the best would be to post the new file, and update the release > notes to mention that we have replaced the original large Mac file with > a smaller one that (we believe) has the same content. > > Sound reasonable?Sounds reasonable to me. Curt
Sounds good. Apologies for the mess. I too would like to stick to process, but I''m also figuring out what the process is at the same time. I''ll post the file this afternoon and send you the link. Nick Curt Hibbs wrote:>Kevin Smith wrote: > > >>Nick Kral wrote: >> >> >>>Ok, I found the checkbox I forgot to check to make the disk image a >>>proper size. I have a new disk image of wxruby-0.2.1-osx-panther (same >>>code, different file) that is only 1.5 Mb in size. Would you like that, >>>or should I leave it as is? >>> >>> >>Hmm. Good question. I would like to put the new file up, but it runs >>against my desire to have solid processes. We could go to 0.2.2, but >>that seems silly since nothing else is changing. >> >>I think the best would be to post the new file, and update the release >>notes to mention that we have replaced the original large Mac file with >>a smaller one that (we believe) has the same content. >> >>Sound reasonable? >> >> > >Sounds reasonable to me. > >Curt > >_______________________________________________ >wxruby-users mailing list >wxruby-users@rubyforge.org >http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wxruby-users > > > >