wxruby development - Oct 2006 - Updating RAA

I realized we might want to update RAA to mention wxruby2. But should it 
be a new "wxruby2" entry, or should we add mentions of wxruby2 in the 
existing entry, or should we switch the entry to only talk about wxruby2?

Kevin

Kevin Smith wrote:
> I realized we might want to update RAA to mention wxruby2. But should it 
> be a new "wxruby2" entry, or should we add mentions of wxruby2 in
the
> existing entry, or should we switch the entry to only talk about wxruby2?
>   
I would be inclined to switch the entry to mention only wxruby2 releases.

alex

How about creating a new wxRuby2 entry and have the old wxRuby tell
users it is no longer supported and supply the link to the wxRuby2
entry? I believe I have seen other projects do that.

Sean

On 10/16/06, Alex Fenton <alex at pressure.to>
wrote:
> Kevin Smith wrote:
> > I realized we might want to update RAA to mention wxruby2. But should
it
> > be a new "wxruby2" entry, or should we add mentions of
wxruby2 in the
> > existing entry, or should we switch the entry to only talk about
wxruby2?
> >
> I would be inclined to switch the entry to mention only wxruby2 releases.
>
> alex
> _______________________________________________
> Wxruby-development mailing list
> Wxruby-development at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wxruby-development
>