A large group 64kbps listening test has just come to an end, organised through
the Hydrogenaudio[1] audio discussion board (and managed expertly by Roberto
Amorim). Eight codecs were tested on twelve different samples, designed to
cover a wide range of musical genres. The codecs tested were[2]:
* Ahead/Nero 6.0.0.15 HE AAC VBR profile Streaming
* Ogg Vorbis post-1.0 CVS -q 0
* MP3pro (from Adobe Audition 1.0) VBR quality 40
* Real Audio Gecko (from Real Producer 9.0.1 64kbps
* Windows Media Audio v9 VBR quality 50
* QuickTime 6.3 AAC LC 64kbps, Best Quality
* Lame MP3 encoder 3.90.3 --alt-preset 128 --scale 1. high anchor
* FhG MP3 encoder (from Adobe Audition 1.0) 64kbps CBR. bottom anchor
And the results[3] are very interesting -- pointing up areas where Vorbis needs
to improve, as well as other areas where it performs very well. Overall,
ignoring the high and low anchors, we find:
He AAC, MP3Pro, Vorbis (with He AAC > Vorbis) > Real, WMA, QT AAC;
although individual samples have very different results, including several
where Vorbis performs very badly. I believe the samples are still available if
any of you would like to compare the results to your own listening preferences.
<p>[1] http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/
[2] http://audio.ciara.us/test/64test/presentation.html
[3] http://audio.ciara.us/test/64test/results.html
--
Jon
<p>__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
'vorbis-request@xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is
needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.