These visual differences have been discussed before and the result was
to ignore them. It seems people would rather use there eyes to compare
audio codecs! Use your ears and if you hear a difference then the
developers will want to know.
Ross.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-vorbis@xiph.org [mailto:owner-vorbis@xiph.org] On
> Behalf Of Chiedje!
> Sent: Tuesday, 18 February 2003 10:53
> To: vorbis@xiph.org
> Subject: [vorbis] Re:
>
>
> I think Cliff's got a point there. I tried to make a
> comparison myself,
> too, but did it slightly different. Check
> www.rachid.nl/oggmp3/ for more
> details. In brief, I compared
> a 192 kbit MP3 and OGG file and a 64 kbit MP3
> and OGG file. Advantage is that every comparison is visible
> in just one
> graphic, so it will be easier to see things.
>
> By the way, especially at lower bitrates, the differences are amazing.
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
'vorbis-request@xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is
needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
