Hello all, Would somebody please comment on it? Thank you in advance. Monty wrote: Monty> "It depends". Vorbis will be able to do coupling such that Monty> joint stereo is exactly equivalent to L/R (reduction is in the Monty> range of 128->100 or so], or apply addiitonal stereo/spatial Monty> specific psychoacoustics to further reduce bitrate to eliminate Monty> inaudible elements of the stereo image. Me asked:>It's fabulous, really!>I have only one question: what happened to David Carter's proposal to >use AmbiSonic to do n-channel coupling? Is there a chance it would be >introduced at a later stage? I hope the format of Vorbis is flexible >enough to make it possible to introduce AmbiSonic post 1.0.>Thanks, SyPBye SyP -- A picture is worth a thousand words. It just takes up more bandwidth. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 02:40:00PM +0200, SyP wrote:> Hello all, > > Would somebody please comment on it? Thank you in advance.Ambisonics are still part of the plan, but I decided that the proper design did not make ambisonics part of the channel coupling system itself. What we actually need is an ambisonics official mapping and decoder in the libs post-1.0. Monty --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.