Michael Brown
2016-Mar-03 09:27 UTC
[syslinux] "Tick-counting" vs "Tick-less" timekeeping issues on VMs emulating BIOS PCs
On 03/03/16 09:18, Patrick Masotta wrote:>>>> How so? > > it says they cannot emulate the timer interrupt very well; > that's what I understood...If it's the VMware document I'm thinking of (titled "Timekeeping in VMware Virtual Machines"), then the issue is that emulating the timer interrupt can cause a heavy load on the host if the guest timer is configured to run at a high rate. Michael
Patrick Masotta
2016-Mar-03 09:34 UTC
[syslinux] "Tick-counting" vs "Tick-less" timekeeping issues on VMs emulating BIOS PCs
>>>If it's the VMware document I'm thinking of (titled "Timekeeping in VMware Virtual Machines"), then the issue is that emulating the timer interrupt can cause a heavy load on the host if the guest timer is configured to run at a high rate. Michael <<< It seems it's more that that even at the regular rate... Best, Patrick
Michael Brown
2016-Mar-03 09:36 UTC
[syslinux] "Tick-counting" vs "Tick-less" timekeeping issues on VMs emulating BIOS PCs
On 03/03/16 09:34, Patrick Masotta wrote:> > If it's the VMware document I'm thinking of (titled "Timekeeping in > > VMware Virtual Machines"), then the issue is that emulating the timer > > interrupt can cause a heavy load on the host if the guest timer is > > configured to run at a high rate. > > It seems it's more that that even at the regular rate...At the BIOS standard rate of 18.2Hz, no modern machine is even going to notice. Michael
Reasonably Related Threads
- "Tick-counting" vs "Tick-less" timekeeping issues on VMs emulating BIOS PCs
- "Tick-counting" vs "Tick-less" timekeeping issues on VMs emulating BIOS PCs
- "Tick-counting" vs "Tick-less" timekeeping issues on VMs emulating BIOS PCs
- "Tick-counting" vs "Tick-less" timekeeping issues on VMs emulating BIOS PCs
- "Tick-counting" vs "Tick-less" timekeeping issues on VMs emulating BIOS PCs