Michael Brown
2016-Mar-03 08:39 UTC
[syslinux] "Tick-counting" vs "Tick-less" timekeeping issues on VMs emulating BIOS PCs
On 03/03/16 07:31, Patrick Masotta wrote:> > The timer interrupt works fine in at least KVM, Xen, VMware, and > > Hyper-V. (I've tested iPXE in all of those virtual environments, and > > iPXE relies on the timer interrupt actually triggering a call to an ISR > > within the VM.) > > Well, that contradicts what the VMware document says.How so? Michael
Patrick Masotta
2016-Mar-03 09:18 UTC
[syslinux] "Tick-counting" vs "Tick-less" timekeeping issues on VMs emulating BIOS PCs
>>>How so?it says they cannot emulate the timer interrupt very well; that's what I understood...
Michael Brown
2016-Mar-03 09:27 UTC
[syslinux] "Tick-counting" vs "Tick-less" timekeeping issues on VMs emulating BIOS PCs
On 03/03/16 09:18, Patrick Masotta wrote:>>>> How so? > > it says they cannot emulate the timer interrupt very well; > that's what I understood...If it's the VMware document I'm thinking of (titled "Timekeeping in VMware Virtual Machines"), then the issue is that emulating the timer interrupt can cause a heavy load on the host if the guest timer is configured to run at a high rate. Michael
Possibly Parallel Threads
- "Tick-counting" vs "Tick-less" timekeeping issues on VMs emulating BIOS PCs
- "Tick-counting" vs "Tick-less" timekeeping issues on VMs emulating BIOS PCs
- "Tick-counting" vs "Tick-less" timekeeping issues on VMs emulating BIOS PCs
- "Tick-counting" vs "Tick-less" timekeeping issues on VMs emulating BIOS PCs
- "Tick-counting" vs "Tick-less" timekeeping issues on VMs emulating BIOS PCs