Patrick Masotta
2015-Jul-18 17:42 UTC
[syslinux] [PATCH] Updated udp.c to use real client ip and subnetmask values if on local subnet
>>>>> > This is good; BTW what was the rationale at the time for > taking AllowPromiscuous=1 ?? That's the point of the aforementioned reply.? It seems unnecessary, confusing and actually breaks some VM use. -- -Gene <<<< Agreed; have you already patched this code in your repo? files involved? Best, Patrick
Gene Cumm
2015-Jul-18 18:13 UTC
[syslinux] [PATCH] Updated udp.c to use real client ip and subnetmask values if on local subnet
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Patrick Masotta <masottaus at yahoo.com> wrote:>>>>> > > > > This is good; BTW what was the rationale at the time for > > taking > AllowPromiscuous=1 ?? > > That's the point of the aforementioned reply. It seems unnecessary, > confusing and actually breaks some VM use. > > -- > -Gene > <<<< > > Agreed; have you already patched this code in your repo?No.> files involved?efi/udp.c with its 2 instances. They're the only place "AllowPromiscuous" is present. -- -Gene
Patrick Masotta
2015-Jul-19 10:16 UTC
[syslinux] [PATCH] Updated udp.c to use real client ip and subnetmask values if on local subnet
>>>> files involved? efi/udp.c with its 2 instances.? They're the only place "AllowPromiscuous" is present. -- -Gene <<< I'll start testing this; Unfortunately I do not have a DHCP relay environment handy. Hopefully Jeff Sloan can give us a hand with this testing. Best, Patrick
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [PATCH] Updated udp.c to use real client ip and subnetmask values if on local subnet
- [PATCH] Updated udp.c to use real client ip and subnetmask values if on local subnet
- [PATCH] Updated udp.c to use real client ip and subnetmask values if on local subnet
- [PATCH] Updated udp.c to use real client ip and subnetmask values if on local subnet
- [PATCH] Updated udp.c to use real client ip and subnetmask values if on local subnet