Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "allowpromiscuous".
2015 Jul 18
2
[PATCH] Updated udp.c to use real client ip and subnetmask values if on local subnet
>>>
As noted in the reply to Matt Fleming's initial EFI networking
implementation, I think some systems go stupid on UseDefaultAddress
and AllowPromiscuous as true.? I just tested and saw no negative
results from killing the codelines setting AllowPromiscuous in
efi/udp.c on my machines.
--
-Gene
<<<
This is good; BTW what was the rationale at the time for
taking AllowPromiscuous=1 ??
Best,
Patrick
2015 Jul 18
2
[PATCH] Updated udp.c to use real client ip and subnetmask values if on local subnet
>>>
What uEFI specification version does your system claim to be compliant
with?? I'd like to read over the spec for the call to verify things.
--
-Gene
<<<
I've tried to find the relationship between UseDefaultAddress and DHP relays
but I couldn't find anything. The use of DHCP relays should be really transparent...
Best,
Patrick
2015 Jul 18
2
[PATCH] Updated udp.c to use real client ip and subnetmask values if on local subnet
>>>>
>
> This is good; BTW what was the rationale at the time for
> taking
AllowPromiscuous=1 ??
That's the point of the aforementioned reply.? It seems unnecessary,
confusing and actually breaks some VM use.
--
-Gene
<<<<
Agreed; have you already patched this code in your repo?
files involved?
Best,
Patrick
2015 Jul 18
0
[PATCH] Updated udp.c to use real client ip and subnetmask values if on local subnet
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Patrick Masotta <masottaus at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>
> As noted in the reply to Matt Fleming's initial EFI networking
> implementation, I think some systems go stupid on UseDefaultAddress
> and AllowPromiscuous as true. I just tested and saw no negative
> results from killing the codelines setting AllowPromiscuous in
> efi/udp.c on my machines.
>
> --
> -Gene
> <<<
>
> This is good; BTW what was the rationale at the time for
> taking AllowPromiscuous=1 ??
That...
2015 Jul 18
0
[PATCH] Updated udp.c to use real client ip and subnetmask values if on local subnet
...to find the relationship between UseDefaultAddress and DHP relays
> but I couldn't find anything. The use of DHCP relays should be really transparent...
As noted in the reply to Matt Fleming's initial EFI networking
implementation, I think some systems go stupid on UseDefaultAddress
and AllowPromiscuous as true. I just tested and saw no negative
results from killing the codelines setting AllowPromiscuous in
efi/udp.c on my machines.
--
-Gene
2015 Jul 18
0
[PATCH] Updated udp.c to use real client ip and subnetmask values if on local subnet
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Patrick Masotta <masottaus at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
> >
> > This is good; BTW what was the rationale at the time for
> > taking
> AllowPromiscuous=1 ??
>
> That's the point of the aforementioned reply. It seems unnecessary,
> confusing and actually breaks some VM use.
>
> --
> -Gene
> <<<<
>
> Agreed; have you already patched this code in your repo?
No.
> files involved?
efi/udp.c with it...
2015 Jul 20
1
[syslinux:firmware] efi: Add network support
>>>
>
> Why promiscuous?? That seems to want to accept it on any local address
> and put the NIC into promiscuous mode, avoiding the default MAC filter
> in the NIC.? This should be uncessary as we're not capturinig.
If I remember correctly, this was required for TFTP boot because
otherwise it's impossible to accept DHCP packets when we have no IP
address