On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Wayne Workman <wayne.workman2012 at gmail.com> wrote:> I must say that I've learned an incredible amount and only hope to learn > more. Keep up the good work.Thanks.> I have been prowling your email correspondence for the FOG Project. You may > find them here: fogproject.org and their forums are located here: > forums.fogproject.org > > I'm looking at how syslinux's future can play/how it plays now with FOG. I'm > wondering if this technology can support WiFi based communications as the > Etherboot project does.Etherboot, gPXE and iPXE are mostly orthogonal to Syslinux. Although they may provide a menuing system, their real background is getting up to at least a PXE-friendly environment that can be used by built-in functionality or for loading another PXE NBP like PXELINUX. I'd think Syslinux also has a more extensible infrastructure. As long as there's a suitable underlying API that PXELINUX can call, it won't matter what Ethernet-like medium is underneath. -- -Gene
Gene Cumm via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> writes:> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Wayne Workman > <wayne.workman2012 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'm wondering if this technology can support WiFi based >> communications as the Etherboot project does. > > As long as there's a suitable underlying API that PXELINUX can call, > it won't matter what Ethernet-like medium is underneath.Another option is using the iSCSI support of iPXE. That works over WiFi, and you can use plain syslinux on top of that. -- Regards, Feri.
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [PATCH] Updated udp.c to use real client ip and subnetmask values if on local subnet
- FOG on CentOS Wiki contribution suggestion?
- [PATCH] Updated udp.c to use real client ip and subnetmask values if on local subnet
- Setting up windows 10 clients and depoy it.
- Batch mode creates huge diffs, bug(s)?