I'm going to try to push 4.05 out this week, so please holler if there is anything critical missing. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
Hi, will this also support HTTP in pxelinux.0 so that I can get rid of the gpxelinux.0? If not, when will native HTTP support be part of pxelinux? Especially with the VM-related bugfixes we had seen discussed here recently... Regards, Schlomo On 6 December 2011 06:47, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote:> I'm going to try to push 4.05 out this week, so please holler if there > is anything critical missing. > > -hpa > > -- > H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center > I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. > > _______________________________________________ > Syslinux mailing list > Submissions to Syslinux at zytor.com > Unsubscribe or set options at: > http://www.zytor.com/mailman/listinfo/syslinux > Please do not send private replies to mailing list traffic. > >
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:47 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote:> I'm going to try to push 4.05 out this week, so please holler if there > is anything critical missing. > >Hi Peter, Would it be nice to have NTFS support in 4.05 ? Paulo> -hpa > > -- > H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center > I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. > > _______________________________________________ > Syslinux mailing list > Submissions to Syslinux at zytor.com > Unsubscribe or set options at: > http://www.zytor.com/mailman/listinfo/syslinux > Please do not send private replies to mailing list traffic. > >
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 17:54, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote:> On 12/08/2011 01:27 PM, Schlomo Schapiro wrote: >> >> I see. When would 4.10 be released? Any ideas on that? What can a >> not-so-much-C/ASM-programmers do to help with a 4.10 release? >> > > Please test the 4.10-preX releases and report problems.Any chance of a -pre17 soon for the bug seen on VMware platforms? -- -Gene
----- Original Message ----- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa at zytor.com> To: "SYSLINUX Mailing list" <syslinux at zytor.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 6:47 AM Subject: [syslinux] Last call for 4.05> I'm going to try to push 4.05 out this week, so please holler if there > is anything critical missing. > > -hpa > > -- > H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center > I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. >To be enable to run 'make spotless && make' on syslinux-4.0.4 or 4.0.5-pre7, I had this patch accepted on ipxe tree https://git.ipxe.org/ipxe.git/commitdiff/fe61f6de0dd5d39ac3de5e8e18742f9bd0aafad7 or syslinux fail to build with a gcc-4.4 modified to build hardened by default, like alt-linux, gentoo and others have. Failure is [BUILD] bin/cpu.o arch/i386/core/cpu.c: In function 'get_cpuinfo': arch/i386/include/bits/cpu.h:79: error: can't find a register in class 'BREG' while reloading 'asm' arch/i386/include/bits/cpu.h:79: error: can't find a register in class 'BREG' while reloading 'asm' arch/i386/include/bits/cpu.h:79: error: can't find a register in class 'BREG' while reloading 'asm' arch/i386/include/bits/cpu.h:79: error: can't find a register in class 'BREG' while reloading 'asm' arch/i386/include/bits/cpu.h:79: error: 'asm' operand has impossible constraints arch/i386/include/bits/cpu.h:79: error: 'asm' operand has impossible constraints arch/i386/include/bits/cpu.h:79: error: 'asm' operand has impossible constraints arch/i386/include/bits/cpu.h:79: error: 'asm' operand has impossible constraints make[3]: *** [bin/cpu.o] Error 1 Bug may be considered non-critical unless 4.05 need to be patched a day and so recompiled. Gilles