search for: breg

...I/var/tmp/portage/xen-3.0.2/work/xen-3.0.2/xen/include/asm-x86/mach-default -msoft-float -g -D__XEN__ -c multicall.c -o multicall.o memory.c: In function `guest_remove_page'': /var/tmp/portage/xen-3.0.2/work/xen-3.0.2/xen/include/asm/mm.h:206: error: can''t find a register in class `BREG'' while reloading `asm'' make[2]: *** [memory.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... multicall.c: In function `do_multicall'': multicall.c:43: error: can''t find a register in class `BREG'' while reloading `asm'' make[2]: *** [multica...

I made a patch that depending of gcc flavor add -no-pie or -nopie on libutil and dos Makefile. This fix fatal error like this sha1hash.c: In function `SHA1Transform': ../include/netinet/in.h:24: error: can't find a register in class `BREG' while reloading `asm' ../include/netinet/in.h:24: error: can't find a register in class `BREG' while reloading `asm' ../include/netinet/in.h:24: error: can't find a register in class `BREG' while reloading `asm' ... Gilles -------------- next part -------------- A...

gcc hardened by default is seen on gentoo, alt-linux, HLFS, etc. Patch fix on syslinux this error during gpxe compilation: [BUILD] bin/cpu.o arch/i386/core/cpu.c: In function 'get_cpuinfo': arch/i386/include/bits/cpu.h:79: error: can't find a register in class 'BREG' while reloading 'asm' arch/i386/include/bits/cpu.h:79: error: can't find a register in class 'BREG' while reloading 'asm' arch/i386/include/bits/cpu.h:79: error: can't find a register in class 'BREG' while reloading 'asm' arch/i386/include/bits/c...

...nstruction pattern. The following code snippet is not really working for me: SDValue rvexTargetLowering:: LowerAddCG(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const { unsigned Opc = Op.getOpcode(); SDNode* N = Op.getNode(); EVT VT = Op.getValueType(); DebugLoc dl = N->getDebugLoc(); SDValue BReg = DAG.getTargetConstant(rvex::B0, VT); // Add extra register to output return DAG.getNode(rvexISD::Addc, dl, VT, N->getOperand(0), N->getOperand(1), BReg); } Could anybody advice me on a way to make the backend know that the ADDE instruction will cause a branch register to be used? Tha...

I'm going to try to push 4.05 out this week, so please holler if there is anything critical missing. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

...), 2. 'Backward Elimination Procedure' , 3. 'Forward Selection Procedure' , 4. 'Stepwise Regression Procedure' (as SAS's PROC REG /METHOD = STEPWISE / FORWARD / BACKWARD which methods are also available in SPSS) or 5. 'Best subset selection (as MINITAB's BREG - BEST k command)'. Any response / help / comment / suggestion / idea / web-link / replies will be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance for your time. _______________________ Mohammad Ehsanul Karim <wildscop at yahoo.com> Institute of Statistical Research and Training University o...

...implementation is wrong. def MoveTy : SDTypeProfile<1, 1, []>; def MoveFlag : SDNode<"FOOISD::MOVE_FLAG", MoveTy, [SDNPHasChain, SDNPSideEffect, SDNPMayStore, SDNPMayLoad]>; let hasSideEffects = 1, mayStore = 1, mayLoad = 1 in { def MOVE : InstFOO<(outs ARegs:$dst), (ins BRegs:$src), "move $dst, $src", [(set i32:$dst, (MoveFlag i32:$src))]>; For example, I add this node into SDAG when I want to move the formal argument from the specific register class to other register class. I implement it in LowerFormalArguments()...

...supported fixme:threadpool:RtlQueueWorkItem Flags 0x4 not supported fixme:threadpool:RtlQueueWorkItem Flags 0x4 not supported fixme:threadpool:RtlQueueWorkItem Flags 0x4 not supported fixme:threadpool:RtlQueueWorkItem Flags 0x4 not supported fixme:dbghelp_dwarf:compute_location Only supporting one breg (18 -> 24) fixme:dbghelp_dwarf:compute_location Only supporting one breg (17 -> 23) fixme:dbghelp_dwarf:compute_location Only supporting one breg (17 -> 23) I use Wine 1.2 and i use a network Wifi. Thanks for your help.

This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops. The binary patch optimization is important on native case because the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect

This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops. The binary patch optimization is important on native case because the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect

This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization. The binary patch optimization is important on

This patch set is intended for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization. The binary patch optimization is important on

This patch set is for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization. The binary patch optimization is important on native

This patch set is for the next merge window. They are just enhancements of the already merged patches or ia64 porting from x86 paravirt techniques and that their quality is enough for merge. This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops which depends on the patch series I sent out, ia64/pv_ops, xen: more paravirtualization. The binary patch optimization is important on native

This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops. The binary patch optimization is important on native case because the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect call into in-place execution or direct call. The first patch imports helper functions which themselves doesn't interesting things. The second patch replaces the indirect function calls with a

This patch set is for binary patch optimization for paravirt_ops. The binary patch optimization is important on native case because the paravirt_ops overhead can be reduced by converting indirect call into in-place execution or direct call. The first patch imports helper functions which themselves doesn't interesting things. The second patch replaces the indirect function calls with a

Hi, I am working on a new back-end for LLVM. This architecture has two register types, data(A) and accumulator(B). A registers are i32 where as B registers are i64. This is causing me some headaches, as far as I can tell, it's not really possible to mix the two using tablegen? In the hardware, every instruction can either take an A register or a B register, in tablegen (as far as I can

...ing UseGLSL to disabled didn't changed anything. I have installed d3dx9_36 and vcrun2008 with winetricks. This is output from the terminal (wine.log): Code: fixme:dbghelp_dwarf:compute_location Only supporting one reg (edx/19 -> -2) fixme:dbghelp_dwarf:compute_location Only supporting one breg (ecx/18 -> edx/19) fixme:xinput:XInputGetState (0 0xc0b848) fixme:win:EnumDisplayDevicesW ((null),0,0x32f234,0x00000000), stub! fixme:ddraw:DirectDrawEnumerateExA flags 0x00000001 not handled fixme:wbemprox:wbem_locator_ConnectServer 0x4f7ae20, L"\\\\.\\root\\cimv2", (null), (null), (n...

...pi:SetEntriesInAclA 1 0x33f7c4 (nil) 0x33f80c fixme:advapi:SetSecurityInfo stub fixme:dpnhpast:DllRegisterServer :stub wine: Call from 0x7ef93900 to unimplemented function Memory.dll.??0MemoryPoolObj@@QAE at PBDW4MEMPOOLTYPE@@I at Z, aborting fixme:dbghelp_dwarf:compute_location Only supporting one breg (18 -> 24) Could not load wine-gecko. HTML rendering will be disabled. I have never seen that dll before. There isn't one in my Windows 7 installation. What should I do with this?? Thanks!

...DIExpressions. If the value is ultimately register allocated and the DIExpression is empty, we will emit a DW_OP_regN location expression. If the value is spilled, we usually don't need to append DW_OP_stack_value because the location is now a memory location, which can be described by DW_OP_[f]breg. Today, passes that want to add "plus 3" to a DIExpression go out of their way to add DW_OP_stack_value to the DIExpression because the backend won't do it for us, even though dbg.value normally describes the value, not an address. To explore the alternative DW_OP_stack_value model,...