Syslinux version 3.74 introduced the following change (I know, old news really) -> Suppress the Loading ... message if "quiet" is specified on the kernel command line. Unfortunately, for our PXELinux environment this was a very unwanted change. The linux command line parameter 'quiet' is included and passed to linux because we want (and in cases absolutely require) that the kernel be booted in quiet mode. However, since 3.74 this also means that PXELinux runs quietly, making it impossible to see if the image is properly loading, or if it is stalled, or slow. We appear to be left with no way to specify (that I can find) the quietness of the two independently. (In my view, it was undesirable to piggyback off of an already existing commonly used parameter - making it impossible to separate the two). This means we are left with two undesirable choices, to either run completely silent (making network or server or pxe firmware problems very difficult to detect), or run without quiet completely, which causes us problems on the linux side. Any workable suggestions with the current code (running 4.03 now)? Or do I need to work on a environment where I can custom build my own pxelinux.0 or gpxelinux.0? (I'm assuming there's near zero chance of me convincing you to change the existing behavior. As I recognize it's a beneficial behavior in probably 99% of cases). Thanks, -Ken
On 11/22/2010 03:24 PM, Kenneth Morse wrote:> Syslinux version 3.74 introduced the following change (I know, old news really) > > -> Suppress the Loading ... message if "quiet" is specified on the > kernel command line. > > Unfortunately, for our PXELinux environment this was a very unwanted > change. The linux command line parameter 'quiet' is included and > passed to linux because we want (and in cases absolutely require) that > the kernel be booted in quiet mode. However, since 3.74 this also > means that PXELinux runs quietly, making it impossible to see if the > image is properly loading, or if it is stalled, or slow. We appear > to be left with no way to specify (that I can find) the quietness of > the two independently. (In my view, it was undesirable to piggyback > off of an already existing commonly used parameter - making it > impossible to separate the two). This means we are left with two > undesirable choices, to either run completely silent (making network > or server or pxe firmware problems very difficult to detect), or run > without quiet completely, which causes us problems on the linux side. > > Any workable suggestions with the current code (running 4.03 now)? Or > do I need to work on a environment where I can custom build my own > pxelinux.0 or gpxelinux.0? > > (I'm assuming there's near zero chance of me convincing you to change > the existing behavior. As I recognize it's a beneficial behavior in > probably 99% of cases). >Use "loglevel=4" instead of "quiet". -hpa
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Kenneth Morse <kdmorse at gmail.com> wrote:> Syslinux version 3.74 introduced the following change (I know, old news really) > > -> Suppress the Loading ... message if "quiet" is specified on the > kernel command line. > > Unfortunately, for our PXELinux environment this was a very unwanted > change. ?The linux command line parameter 'quiet' is included and > passed to linux because we want (and in cases absolutely require) that > the kernel be booted in quiet mode. ?However, since 3.74 this also > means that PXELinux runs quietly, making it impossible to see if the > image is properly loading, or if it is stalled, or slow. ? We appear > to be left with no way to specify (that I can find) the quietness of > the two independently. ?(In my view, it was undesirable to piggyback > off of an already existing commonly used parameter - making it > impossible to separate the two). ?This means we are left with two > undesirable choices, to either run completely silent (making network > or server or pxe firmware problems very difficult to detect), or run > without quiet completely, which causes us problems on the linux side. > > Any workable suggestions with the current code (running 4.03 now)? ?Or > do I need to work on a environment where I can custom build my own > pxelinux.0 or gpxelinux.0? > > (I'm assuming there's near zero chance of me convincing you to change > the existing behavior. As I recognize it's a beneficial behavior in > probably 99% of cases).I think it'd be great if we could separate the 'quiet' command for Linux and for syslinux. Moreover, if we have a 'quiet' command for syslinux, would it be possible to turn off the Copyright message? regards, Lucas De Marchi
Apparently Analagous Threads
- gpxelinux.0 can't work with microsoft RIS (startrom.n12)
- gpxelinux.0 under a QEMU GPXE virtual boot rom?
- bug (I think) in gpxelinux.0 ?
- gpxelinux.0 Unable to locate configuration file while pxelinux.0 works
- gpxelinux.0 (and maybe pxelinux.0) broken since 51f563a2e52d1e2668e7b7a3d480c4f1e4b89d97