search for: piggyback

Hi, I''m new to Rails and Ruby and can''t access methods/columns from an ActiveRecord object that is a "piggy-back" row as described by David here: http://www.loudthinking.com/arc/000235.html Via Console I can create the piggyback object but reading attributes gives "TypeError: cannot convert String into Integer" (this is in Console and the browser). Some commented Console output is below, and any help is very much appreciated! (I can also post my model object if needed.) # This is a regular old ActiveRecord...

Hi everybody, I''d like to add a custom action to be triggered after/when an autocompleted field has been/is beeing updated by the autocompletion process. I tried the obvious - a field observer -, but it doesn''t work (see code below). I know I could write the autocompletion code myself, but I wonder if there is a simpler/more elegant way? Any idea? TIA Alain The

Hello. I am not certain even how to search the archives for this particular question, so if there is an obvious answer, please smack me with a large halibut and send me to the URLs. I have been experimenting with fitting curves by using both maximum likelihood and maximum spacing estimation techniques. Originally, I have been writing distribution-specific functions in 'R' which work

...web.net/articles/66-optimizing_and_simplifying_limited_eager_loading_in_activerecord I''d appreciate if I could get some reviewers for this patch, since my project''s performance is simply not viable without this patch. Despite the weirdness of the actual diff, the change is mostly piggybacking on top of logic that''s already there. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscr...

...eeds that information to do some post-processing step on the results of running the binary. That sounds a lot like the role of debug info. In fact, having a debugger open a core file is precisely equivalent to what llvm-profdata needs to do in this regard AFAICT. So it would be best if possible to piggyback on all the effort that has gone into plumbing that data to make debug info work. For example, I know that on Darwin there's a fair amount of system-level integration to make split dwarf "just work" while keeping debug info out of final binaries. If there is a not-too-hacky way to pig...

...g took (perhaps expanding it later to break down materialization, etc). In addition to significantly minimizing un-accounted time, this can facilitate future attempts to optimize the IR reading code. Any objections/insights? If this is deemed useful, there's the question of implementation. 1. Piggybacking on time-passes (like DWARF dumping does) is probably not the "right thing to do", and hard to implement too since some tools like llvm-diff don't even link in the pass infrastructure (which defines the required globals). 2. Creating a separate flag is feasible, but IRReader is curr...

...t allows minimizing the runtime memory overhead for the program image to the absolute minimum, which is important for embedded applications. Debug info naturally stays out of the program image and so this problem is automatically solved. -- Sean Silva > > So it would be best if possible to piggyback on all the effort that has > gone into plumbing that data to make debug info work. For example, I know > that on Darwin there's a fair amount of system-level integration to make > split dwarf "just work" while keeping debug info out of final binaries. > > If there is a...

...rocedural BFI computation is likely to be more expensive in terms of compile-time. - Many function passes invalidate the BFI. This will require selective invalidation of function BFIs. - Inliner correctly updates function counts of a callee after a callsite is inlined. We can piggyback on this mechanism by using synthetic counts. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20171212/2a0fb507/attachment.html>

Hi Everyone, I have a dell 1750 server with ERA/O card running on FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE According to Dell, the ERA card supports ipmi 1.0: http://linux.dell.com/ipmi.shtml But so far no luck with freebsd :/ [root@home /usr/src/sys/i386/conf]# ipmitool -I open channel info 1 Could not open device at /dev/ipmi0 or /dev/ipmi/0 or /dev/ipmidev/0: No such file or directory

...e. However, since 3.74 this also means that PXELinux runs quietly, making it impossible to see if the image is properly loading, or if it is stalled, or slow. We appear to be left with no way to specify (that I can find) the quietness of the two independently. (In my view, it was undesirable to piggyback off of an already existing commonly used parameter - making it impossible to separate the two). This means we are left with two undesirable choices, to either run completely silent (making network or server or pxe firmware problems very difficult to detect), or run without quiet completely, which...

...inary (not even consider coverage mapping) built usually does not turn on debug information. Mixing them can lead to significant object size increase that leads to linker failure for large applications. David > > -- Sean Silva > > >> >> So it would be best if possible to piggyback on all the effort that has >> gone into plumbing that data to make debug info work. For example, I know >> that on Darwin there's a fair amount of system-level integration to make >> split dwarf "just work" while keeping debug info out of final binaries. >> &gt...

Hello, I try to build last version of WineHQ on Mac following this : http://wiki.winehq.org/MacOSX/Building, but I can't find any configure file or any other file to generate one with autoconf. What should I do ? I'm on Mac OS X Leopard 10.5.6 with developer tools installed and I try to build version 1.1.19 Thank you,

Hi! LLVM newbie here, I was mainly working on the frontend so far. We had a small hackathon project idea to piggyback on LTO to detect dead code (unused functions). The basic idea is to compile the code for every target and dump the removed functions. Intersect the function symbol names for each target and those functions should be safe to remove from the source code (unless there were some configuration that was...

...n this case, not adequate by the reasons in RFC-1889. but I don't think that's enough. rather than sending comments in the same RTP packet, we'd better send it in RTCP packet. to do that we should define an RTCP APP name field for needed situations, or an RTCP extension. (or, could we piggyback on RFC-2793 and rather define an XML format?...) of course, when the tarkin goes beta, we would need to define its own payload, AND the payload for multiplexed physical stream, which could be compared to RFC-2343. ps. personally, I was a little shocked to see that http://xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/faq....

...ly looks too big for GSoC. > > Though, it might be a good start for someone. > > I believe Bill (CCed) started something few years ago. So, maybe he > can share his thoughts on this project. FWIW, I also started working on a Fortran frontend (derived from Clang, but mostly just to piggyback on the Driver and CPP infrastructure). https://github.com/hfinkel/lfort If you're interested in contributing, that would be great. Nevertheless, I think that Anton is right. Creating a quality Fortran compiler is a community effort, and seems too big for a GSoC project. Perhaps we could identi...

Hi, Let me start a new thread for this. I contacted the Grub people, and they seem more interested in creating a native Xen port of Grub than piggybacking the Mini-OS environment usin kexec as I tried. But they need some documentation on the Xen "firmware" to assess the task at least. What could be given to them apart from hvc_xen.c and xen-blkfront.c in the Linux sources? blkif-drivers-explained.txt? For a start, Grub has a Coreboot...

Hi, Let me start a new thread for this. I contacted the Grub people, and they seem more interested in creating a native Xen port of Grub than piggybacking the Mini-OS environment usin kexec as I tried. But they need some documentation on the Xen "firmware" to assess the task at least. What could be given to them apart from hvc_xen.c and xen-blkfront.c in the Linux sources? blkif-drivers-explained.txt? For a start, Grub has a Coreboot...

...ust saying that we should infer a static profile > for entry counts just like we do for branch probabilities. In the case of > entry counts, we do not hide that information behind an analysis like BPI, > so currently just annotating synthetic PGO entry counts is a simple > solution that piggybacks on the PGO mechanism and Just Works. > > If that is correct then this makes perfect sense to me. > Yes, that is the proposal. > > It could be argued that we ought to refactor things so that the raw PGO > metadata is only ever accessed via a wrapper CGSCC analysis that falls back...

...ables to compile against the patched kernel source tree. I''m using iptables-1.3.0 patched with the ''policy'' match and ''ipp2p''. b) The ''ports'' parameter has been removed from the ip_nat_ftp kernel module (it appears that module now just piggybacks on the similar parameter to ip_conntrack_ftp). You will see a harmless error message about this when Shorewall is [re]started if you have specified that parameter in /etc/shorewall/modules or in /etc/modules.conf. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Off-list replies are cheerfully ignored Shoreline, \ h...

Has anyone worked with Rails on Microsoft''s MSDE database server? (Not SQL 2005 Express, but the older MSDE) I''m curious on the performance and stability of the SQL Driver for Rails. I have a client needing a new web app, but I have to pull and store the data from MSDE (I have no choice on changing this). -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.