James Salsman
2010-Oct-11 18:53 UTC
[Speex-dev] Response to your LC Comment -2393 on Media Ontology spec
Dear Jean-Marc: Would you please send Thierry an ontology mapping table specification for speex according to the format he links to at the end of his message below? Thank you. On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel at w3.org> wrote:> Dear James, > > In your latest email to the MAWG response to your comment, you seem to > disagree with the MAWG proposal. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Sep/0245.html > > "I don't agree with the statement that speex or VP8 are not metadata > formats. ?They are audio and audiovisual media formats which contain > both metadata and data in their specifications. > This disagreement can be resolved if speex and VP8 are included in the > media ontology". > > The group is currently discussing your objection. Speex is an audio > format, and the Ontology spec is mainly incorporating images and video > metadata formats. > > To move forward, ?could you please send the MAWG the 2 mapping tables for > Speex and VP8. > > Please use as template the following tables with the exact name of the > property being mapped to, like ma:identifier, ma:title, etc. > and the same columns: Relation, How to do the mapping, Datatype, Required vs > Optional,XPath > > templates: > http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html#metadata-mapping-table > > Could you please send these ASAP as we are about to release a new > publication of the ?Media Ontology spec > > > > Best regards, > Thierry Michel > >
Jean-Marc Valin
2010-Oct-11 23:54 UTC
[Speex-dev] Response to your LC Comment -2393 on Media Ontology spec
Hi, Not sure what this document is exactly (and don't have time to figure it out), so if you have specific questions on Speex, just list then and I'll try to help you. Cheers, Jean-Marc On 10-10-11 02:53 PM, James Salsman wrote:> Dear Jean-Marc: > > Would you please send Thierry an ontology mapping table specification > for speex according to the format he links to at the end of his > message below? Thank you. > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel at w3.org> wrote: >> Dear James, >> >> In your latest email to the MAWG response to your comment, you seem to >> disagree with the MAWG proposal. >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Sep/0245.html >> >> "I don't agree with the statement that speex or VP8 are not metadata >> formats. They are audio and audiovisual media formats which contain >> both metadata and data in their specifications. >> This disagreement can be resolved if speex and VP8 are included in the >> media ontology". >> >> The group is currently discussing your objection. Speex is an audio >> format, and the Ontology spec is mainly incorporating images and video >> metadata formats. >> >> To move forward, could you please send the MAWG the 2 mapping tables for >> Speex and VP8. >> >> Please use as template the following tables with the exact name of the >> property being mapped to, like ma:identifier, ma:title, etc. >> and the same columns: Relation, How to do the mapping, Datatype, Required vs >> Optional,XPath >> >> templates: >> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html#metadata-mapping-table >> >> Could you please send these ASAP as we are about to release a new >> publication of the Media Ontology spec >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> Thierry Michel >> >> > >