Hi, As some probably noticed, there are still many things missing in the Speex documentation. Given the limited amount of time I have right now, help would be really appreciated. I'm sure there are many people on this list that have successfully used Speex so far and that would be able to contribute to one part or another. Here are things that could be done: - Manual * Provide mode detailed explanation about encoding and decoding * Improve documentation for echo canceller and preprocessor * Document jitter buffer * Complete documentation of the internals (requires more knowledge of Speex) - API * Improve Doxygen comments in the header files - FAQ * Read through the mailing list archive and use answers there to extend the FAQ The last point actually requires limited knowledge about Speex, so it may be a good way to familiarize with Speex. Any takers? Jean-Marc
> Hi, > > As some probably noticed, there are still many things missing in the > Speex documentation. Given the limited amount of time I have right now, > help would be really appreciated. I'm sure there are many people on this > list that have successfully used Speex so far and that would be able to > contribute to one part or another. Here are things that could be done:While not on your list, I have a small testprogram that uses speex+preprocessor+echo cancellator+jitter buffer with DirectSound on win32. It's currently rather messed up and not really clear coded (it's mostly my "what happens if..." program), but if you want I could probably clean it up, add some comments here and there and send it to you for publishing on the webpage. I know that personally I learn almost as much from good examples as I do from reading plain documentation, so this might perhaps be something others can learn from.
Il ven, 2005-06-24 alle 08:05, Jean-Marc Valin ha scritto:> Hi, > > As some probably noticed, there are still many things missing in the > Speex documentation. Given the limited amount of time I have right now, > help would be really appreciated. I'm sure there are many people on this > list that have successfully used Speex so far and that would be able to > contribute to one part or another.Trust me, I would have proposed this initiative candidating myself since I lack docs. However, the component which uses speex is a side-project of the bigger thing. It continues to be pushed over and over so, the only thing I can tell you is I hope I'll be able to do this in the near future... I don't have played speex enough right now to write down something. In case the speex-based subsystem gets a priority boost then maybe I'll feel safe enough after working on it. Too bad this is actually a remote possibility. Massimo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20050627/7ec40609/attachment.htm
> While not on your list, I have a small testprogram that uses > speex+preprocessor+echo cancellator+jitter buffer with DirectSound on > win32. It's currently rather messed up and not really clear coded (it's > mostly my "what happens if..." program), but if you want I could probably > clean it up, add some comments here and there and send it to you for > publishing on the webpage.Sure that would be useful too if it's clean enough that people can understand it. There could in fact be some sort of archive of demo code. Jean-Marc