search for: preprocessor

> No, the 1.2beta1 preprocessor works rather well. I have a different opinion, but glad you like it anyway :-) > In fact, I very much welcomed the change that the preprocessor in > 1.2beta1 now starts out with the assumption of there being no speech, > and only activating and adapting AGC when where there is new activi...

...nel/PostGresSql/RPgSQL_1.0-0.tar.gz --configure-args='--with-pgsql-libraries=/usr/local/pgsql/lib --with-pgsql-includes=/usr/local/pgsql/include' * Installing *source* package 'RPgSQL' ... creating cache ./config.cache checking for crypt in -lcrypt... yes checking how to run the C preprocessor... cc -E checking for /usr/include/libpq-fe.h... no checking how to run the C preprocessor... cc -E checking for /usr/include/pgsql/libpq-fe.h... no checking how to run the C preprocessor... cc -E checking for /usr/include/postgresql/libpq-fe.h... no checking how to run the C preprocessor... cc -E...

I downloaded via svn the release_30 and current version code. I am on x86_64 GNU/Linux, I am compiling with gcc 4.4.6 I compiled release_30 with make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=0 OPTIMIZE_OPTION=-O0 and current release with make In both cases, when I make check-all I get : FAIL: Clang :: Preprocessor/macro_paste_c_block_comment.c (2562 of 9598) ******************** TEST 'Clang :: Preprocessor/macro_paste_c_block_comment.c' FAILED ******************** Script: -- /scratch/user/download/release_30/build/Debug/bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem /scratch/user/download/release_30/build/Debug/b...

...;\\1" LLD_VERSION_MAJOR - ${LLD_VERSION}) -string(REGEX REPLACE "[0-9]+\\.([0-9]+)(\\.[0-9]+)?" "\\1" LLD_VERSION_MINOR - ${LLD_VERSION}) - That worked like expected for clang-10 and ld.lld with "-v" and/or "--version" options. A clang-test FAILED... Preprocessor/iwithprefix.c (below when using LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX = "git"): This is because of the "rc1" string in the include path ("git" accordingly): lib/clang/10.0.1rc1/include To fix this up (maybe someone can help to recognize "git" and "rc[1-9]"): [...

...Obviously, I can't make it run correctly. What happens/doesn't happen? > My question: If I use the SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_ECHO_STATE, I have > changes in the sound: noise seems to be removed. Noise should be removed even without SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_ECHO_STATE as long as you use the preprocessor. > I want to know if I have to use the preprocessor AND that option > to make the echo canceller to work or if it's optionnal? The only thing that SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_ECHO_STATE allows is for the preprocessor to also remove part of the echo that speex_echo_cancellation() (or equivalent...

Andras Kadinger wrote: > I have now found a testcase where SVN AGC starts out good, but then it > keeps increasing the gain but never decreasing it, and eventually goes > out through the roof, during the same single recording. I've been doing massive changes in the svn preprocessor, so I'm not too surprised I broke the AGC, because I haven't updated it. Did it also do that in 1.2-beta1? Jean-Marc

What is the current status of the residual echo suppressor in the preprocessor? I ask this because I have occasional problems with the AEC, in which it fails to cancel echo. I think the problems have to do with samples being dropped by the audio IO system, which is effectively impossible to detect and counteract reliably. A colleague recommended using an echo suppression te...

...snort.conf,v 1.124 2003/05/16 02:52:41 cazz Exp $ # ################################################### # This file contains a sample snort configuration. # You can take the following steps to create your # own custom configuration: # # 1) Set the network variables for your network # 2) Configure preprocessors # 3) Configure output plugins # 4) Customize your rule set # ################################################### # Step #1: Set the network variables: # # You must change the following variables to reflect # your local network. The variable is currently # setup for an RFC 1918 address space. # #...

Dear R Developers, For package seriation I use Fortran code. I recently got a request to add #if defined(__ICC) || defined(__INTEL_COMPILER) USE IFPORT #endif to the code since the Intel Fortran compiler otherwise has problems with rand(). However, to enable the FPP preprocessor I have to either add a compiler flag (-cpp for gFortran) which is possibly not portable or change the extension to .F, .fpp, .FPP (and a few others) which automatically invokes the preprocessor (hopefully on all platforms). I tried .fpp and added the following to Makevars: OBJECTS=arsa.o bburc...

...want to take a look at the proceeding, considering that the version of Snort in FreeBSD ports -is- affected. -----Forwarded Message----- > From: CERT Advisory <cert-advisory@cert.org> > To: cert-advisory@cert.org > Subject: CERT Advisory CA-2003-13 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Snort Preprocessors > Date: 17 Apr 2003 11:30:47 -0400 > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > CERT Advisory CA-2003-13 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Snort Preprocessors > > Original release date: April 17, 2003 > Last revised: -- > Source: CERT/CC > > A c...

...truct. I believe there is no simpler constructs (in terms of readability) than a for-loop, but I am happy to be convinced otherwise. * It is sufficient to eliminate the most common copy-paste programming that I observed. * It is simple enough to understand and maintain, at least I believe so. [Why preprocessor?] I admit that a preprocessor is probably not the best solution. And we can implement for-loop without a preprocessor. The only reason I chose a preprocessor is because (I believe) this would add least changes to the TGParser.cpp. The TGParser.cpp as its current form parses and emits the results...

...nted as a bucket to put elsa tools into and that is the best place for it. I suppose you might convince Scott otherwise but I doubt it and for now I am the maintainer. > Adding test/ofmt.i as a preprocessed C file > Phase: Preprocessing > test/ofmt.i is ignored during this phase What preprocessor are you using? Taras has already found one that is working for him and that is licensed under BSD and that has some features in it that he needs for source to source transformation. I would like us to all use the same one. > > Sorry to add noise to the list with this. I'm just very exc...

...*/ agc_gain = st->agc_max_gain; /* was 200*/ } else agc_gain = st->agc_gain; st->agc_gain = agc_gain; and adding a few items to speex_preprocess_ctl() and the state struct. (I control these things at the application level.. you may wish to control them from within the preprocessor if you're using the preprocessor's VAD.) Anyway, if you can figure out what's going on with the variables you named, I'm sure you can make the necessary modifications to do what you've asked for. I think the preprocessor in general needs a little tweaking like this to work...

>> Adding test/ofmt.i as a preprocessed C file >> Phase: Preprocessing >> test/ofmt.i is ignored during this phase >> > > What preprocessor are you using? Taras has already found one that is > working for him and that is licensed under BSD and that has some > features in it that he needs for source to source transformation. I > would like us to all use the same one. > I'd like to clarify my intentions here. I desig...

...all and Jean-Marc, Firstly thanks a lot to you for helps, at last I accomplished to use speex-1.2beta1 in my speech application. I try to understand speex source code and improve speech quality. The problem in my application (like many people in the list says) is noise. So I've added VAD in preprocessor as following. VAD in preprocessor is very good, there is not noise outside speech. I don't feel problem so much while continuous speech, but when we speak for short intervals, the start of and end of sentences have clatter (maybe clatter does not meet that sound, there is a defect). To overcome...

Hello, I am trying to use the preprocessor VAD to encode at lower bitrate during silence periods. I am able to run the preprocessor and get the VAD flag for each frame, and I am quite happy with it's performance. I would like to know how to pass the preprocessor VAD flag to speex encoder -- basically, i want to force the encoder to ge...

...[[PATTERN]] is nice because it is what FileCheck -DFILE=... uses: # CHECK: ... [[FILE]] FileCheck only preprocesses patterns in CHECK lines. D73821 preprocesses both comment lines (which include CHECK lines) and non-comment lines (which include YAML). It is not a problem that the YAML preprocessor also processes CHECK lines, because tokens on a comment line will be ignored. If -D UNDEF= is not specified, should [[UNDEF]] in the source be considered an error? I think it is fine not to treat it as an error because there can be legitimate use cases of unterminated [[, for example, [[ in a stri...

...running lld-link.exe? Does lld-link.exe exist next to > clang++.exe? If you add -###, what linker command line is clang trying > to run? "C:/Programming/VersionControl/bninja_installed_clang/bin/clang++" -o "C:\Programming\VersionControl\modular-boost\build\boost\bin.v2\libs\preprocessor\test\config_info.test\clang-linux-5.0cl\debug\address-model-32\config_info.exe" -Wl,--start-group "C:\Programming\VersionControl\modular-boost\build\boost\bin.v2\libs\preprocessor\test\config_info.test\clang-linux-5.0cl\debug\address-model-32\config_info.obj" -Wl,-Bstatic -Wl,-...

...ith a little more abstraction. Perhaps that's not worth it, however. I can live with this level of duplication. I would also like to replace #NAME# with a "real" Record field that is automatically added to def-type Records. This removes a lot of the hackiness of #NAME#. > [Why preprocessor?] > > The TGParser.cpp as its current form parses and emits the results in > one-pass. That means it would emit the for-loop body even before we > are done parsing the entire for-loop. It doesn't have to. I'm working on a for loop that is not preprocessor based. It uses the s...

...eex VAD: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2008-August/006860.html It won't perform any miracles, but I think it works pretty well and is easy to tweak. Tom >---- Original Message ---- >From: jmorion at toomeeting.com >To: speex-dev at xiph.org >Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] preprocessor VAD only rocognize between >silence andnot silence >Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:41:53 +0100 > >>Hi, i would like if someone has experienced the same problem and if >im >>using the preprocessor VAD correctly. >> >>A Voice Aactivity Detector is spected to detect hum...