I just download the 1.1.5. And it is working well. I try the xxx_int
functions at least it works. But I did not find the performance improvement.
But when I try this:
m_pPreprocess= speex_preprocess_state_init(m_nSamplesPerFrame,
m_nSampleRate);
speex_preprocess_ctl(m_pPreprocess, SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_DENOISE,
&tmp);
and add
speex_preprocess(m_pPreprocess, buf, NULL);
before encode. The result is really unacceptable. I think there must be
something wrong.
And for the encode I did not use abr or vbr because I can not make them
work.
Does the DENOISE really working in this ver? Or maybe I wrote some wrong
code?
Tks.
<p>Live Global Bid
_____
Alex X. Wang
Programmer Analyst
<http://www.liveglobalbid.com> Live Global Bid Inc.
<mailto:alex@liveglobalbid.com> alex@liveglobalbid.com
Phone: (306) 584 1383
<p><p>
<hr noshade>
<img src="att-0109/01-image001.gif"
alt="image001.gif">
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 4048 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20040528/830502bd/image001-0001.obj
Jean-Marc Valin
2004-Aug-06 15:02 UTC
[speex-dev] Question about SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_DENOISE
I'd say check the result just after denoising (try without denoising
too). Also make sure you've got the right number of samples and all. I
can't say much with the info you're giving me.
Jean-Marc
Le ven 28/05/2004 à 16:29, Alex Wang a écrit :> I just download the 1.1.5. And it is working well. I try the xxx_int
> functions at least it works. But I did not find the performance
> improvement.
>
> But when I try this:
>
> m_pPreprocess> speex_preprocess_state_init(m_nSamplesPerFrame,
m_nSampleRate);
>
> speex_preprocess_ctl(m_pPreprocess,
> SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_DENOISE, &tmp);
>
> and add
>
> speex_preprocess(m_pPreprocess, buf, NULL);
>
> before encode. The result is really unacceptable. I think there must
> be something wrong.
>
> And for the encode I did not use abr or vbr because I can not make
> them work.
>
> Does the DENOISE really working in this ver? Or maybe I wrote some
> wrong code?
>
> Tks.
>
>
>
>
>
> Live Global Bid
>
>
> ___________________________________
>
> Alex X. Wang
> Programmer Analyst
> Live Global Bid Inc.
> alex@liveglobalbid.com
> Phone: (306) 584 1383
>
>
>
--
Jean-Marc Valin
http://www.xiph.org/~jm/
LABORIUS
Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée.
Url :
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20040528/ea584d8a/signature-0001.pgp
Unlivable.
I fix it. I forgot the speex_preprocess(m_pPreprocess, buf, NULL) need to do
enough samples too.
Tks a lot!
And
speex_preprocess_ctl(preprocess, SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_DEREVERB,
&tmp);
f=.4;
speex_preprocess_ctl(preprocess,
SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_DEREVERB_DECAY, &f);
f=.3;
speex_preprocess_ctl(preprocess,
SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_DEREVERB_LEVEL, &f);
What are these source code mean? I can not find any document about them.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-speex-dev@xiph.org [mailto:owner-speex-dev@xiph.org] On Behalf
Of Jean-Marc Valin
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 2:42 PM
To: speex; Alex Wang
Subject: Re: [speex-dev] Question about SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_DENOISE
I'd say check the result just after denoising (try without denoising
too). Also make sure you've got the right number of samples and all. I
can't say much with the info you're giving me.
Jean-Marc
Le ven 28/05/2004 à 16:29, Alex Wang a écrit :> I just download the 1.1.5. And it is working well. I try the xxx_int
> functions at least it works. But I did not find the performance
> improvement.
>
> But when I try this:
>
> m_pPreprocess> speex_preprocess_state_init(m_nSamplesPerFrame,
m_nSampleRate);
>
> speex_preprocess_ctl(m_pPreprocess,
> SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_DENOISE, &tmp);
>
> and add
>
> speex_preprocess(m_pPreprocess, buf, NULL);
>
> before encode. The result is really unacceptable. I think there must
> be something wrong.
>
> And for the encode I did not use abr or vbr because I can not make
> them work.
>
> Does the DENOISE really working in this ver? Or maybe I wrote some
> wrong code?
>
> Tks.
>
>
>
>
>
> Live Global Bid
>
>
> ___________________________________
>
> Alex X. Wang
> Programmer Analyst
> Live Global Bid Inc.
> alex@liveglobalbid.com
> Phone: (306) 584 1383
>
>
>
--
Jean-Marc Valin
http://www.xiph.org/~jm/
LABORIUS
Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
<p>--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
'speex-dev-request@xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is
needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.