Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "m_ppreprocess".
2004 Aug 06
2
Question about SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_DENOISE
I just download the 1.1.5. And it is working well. I try the xxx_int
functions at least it works. But I did not find the performance improvement.
But when I try this:
m_pPreprocess= speex_preprocess_state_init(m_nSamplesPerFrame,
m_nSampleRate);
speex_preprocess_ctl(m_pPreprocess, SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_DENOISE,
&tmp);
and add
speex_preprocess(m_pPreprocess, buf, NULL);
before encode. The result is really unacceptable. I think there must be
something...
2004 Aug 06
2
Question about SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_DENOISE
Unlivable.
I fix it. I forgot the speex_preprocess(m_pPreprocess, buf, NULL) need to do
enough samples too.
Tks a lot!
And
speex_preprocess_ctl(preprocess, SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_DEREVERB,
&tmp);
f=.4;
speex_preprocess_ctl(preprocess,
SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_DEREVERB_DECAY, &f);
f=.3;
speex_prepro...
2004 Aug 06
0
Question about SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_DENOISE
...u're giving me.
Jean-Marc
Le ven 28/05/2004 à 16:29, Alex Wang a écrit :
> I just download the 1.1.5. And it is working well. I try the xxx_int
> functions at least it works. But I did not find the performance
> improvement.
>
> But when I try this:
>
> m_pPreprocess=
> speex_preprocess_state_init(m_nSamplesPerFrame, m_nSampleRate);
>
> speex_preprocess_ctl(m_pPreprocess,
> SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_DENOISE, &tmp);
>
> and add
>
> speex_preprocess(m_pPreprocess, buf, NULL);
>
> before encode. The result is rea...