Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "xxx_int".
Did you mean:
xxx_inr
2004 Aug 06
2
Question about SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_DENOISE
I just download the 1.1.5. And it is working well. I try the xxx_int
functions at least it works. But I did not find the performance improvement.
But when I try this:
m_pPreprocess= speex_preprocess_state_init(m_nSamplesPerFrame,
m_nSampleRate);
speex_preprocess_ctl(m_pPreprocess, SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_DENOISE,
&tmp);
and add
spee...
2004 Aug 06
0
Question about SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_DENOISE
...ter denoising (try without denoising
too). Also make sure you've got the right number of samples and all. I
can't say much with the info you're giving me.
Jean-Marc
Le ven 28/05/2004 à 16:29, Alex Wang a écrit :
> I just download the 1.1.5. And it is working well. I try the xxx_int
> functions at least it works. But I did not find the performance
> improvement.
>
> But when I try this:
>
> m_pPreprocess=
> speex_preprocess_state_init(m_nSamplesPerFrame, m_nSampleRate);
>
> speex_preprocess_ctl(m_pPreprocess,
> SPEEX_PREPROCES...
2004 Aug 06
2
Question about SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_DENOISE
...ter denoising (try without denoising
too). Also make sure you've got the right number of samples and all. I
can't say much with the info you're giving me.
Jean-Marc
Le ven 28/05/2004 à 16:29, Alex Wang a écrit :
> I just download the 1.1.5. And it is working well. I try the xxx_int
> functions at least it works. But I did not find the performance
> improvement.
>
> But when I try this:
>
> m_pPreprocess=
> speex_preprocess_state_init(m_nSamplesPerFrame, m_nSampleRate);
>
> speex_preprocess_ctl(m_pPreprocess,
> SPEEX_PREPROCES...