similar to: Use of least-squares means, are they misleading?

This seems to be common enough problem. I've used a variety of methods (command line as well as utilities like LinNeighborhood) to mount XP shares on my RedHat 8.0 running Samba 2.2.7. I get consistent problems the other way around. Despite a couple of shares on my Linux partition, I am just unable to do get to it. Network Neighborhood shows my Linux/Samba server but no shares, nor can I

I'm trying to use a simple page function. It starts a MeetMe conference with the devices I've listed, but the devices hang up after 3-5 seconds. After doing some research I found this was a problem, and I needed to remove a (5) from app_page.c Well, my app_page.c didn't have the (5). I did make clean; make install again just in case I had some weird compiled version installed that

Just wondering if anyone else thinks that ''response.should be_success'' is potentially misleading. If you''re writing a spec for an action that is failing in some way it can still have a status 200. So while the HTTP request was technically successful, something in the action was not. Perhaps something like ''response.should have_success_status''? Steve

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: gcc4-fs_ext3_acl.c URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/ext3-users/attachments/20050620/80eb5460/attachment.c>

Author: petede Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: ef5d30f0abff39691966b9805b895f3c757b5a9f Log message: 6269165 misleading comments in usr/src/cmd/stat/iostat/iostat.c 6286482 remove the only occurrence of "shit" in OpenSolaris 6231501 Typo in <sys/fem.h> Contributed by Shawn Walker <binarycrusader at gmail.com>. Files: update: usr/src/cmd/stat/iostat/iostat.c

One of our users tried to change his password through Samba and was told that he was unable to do so. Samba logged the following error: user john.doe does not have permissions to change password I checked the Samba source code to see what this error meant, and I found that it meant that the "password can change" time was set to the maximum time allowed. However, when I ran pdbedit to

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471 ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2003-01-19 18:45 ------- What happened when you fixed the permissions of /dev/tty? I bet you were asked to confirm a new host key... ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Author: anish Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 445b09139fca7f498d4a47a7a31fc69e742dd484 Log message: 6414036 ::interrupts share_cnt can be misleading 6415576 add new options to ::interrupts for displaying intrstat like output etc. Files: update: usr/src/cmd/mdb/i86pc/modules/pcplusmp/apic.c update: usr/src/cmd/mdb/i86pc/modules/uppc/uppc.c

(Not a subscriber, please CC me into relevant discussion only) I'm not sure if it's fixable, but this error message from scp in OpenSSH seems to be at least irrelevant, if not completely misleading... prompt> scp remote.example.com:/non-existent/directory/*glob* . select: Bad file descriptor server: OpenSSH openssh-server-2.1.1p1-1 client: OpenSSH openssh-2.1.1p1-1 When the same

Author: sdussud Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: f61d652f8555ce9713866ebafccf8dc96979b524 Log message: 6197520 svccfg import prints misleading message if supplied manifest with empty pg type Files: update: usr/src/cmd/svc/svccfg/svccfg_libscf.c

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5802 Summary: misleading error message in atomic rsync Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: normalperson@yhbt.net

After further investigation: `xm dmesg' output: (XEN) CPU0: VMX disabled by BIOS. (XEN) VMX: failed to initialise. I tried the following: - updated to the latest BIOS 2.21 from Lenovo - reboot and press `ThinkVantage' button - under CPU, enable VMX Rebooting into Xen, it still didn't work After reading about this in search results, I found that many users have had to do a cold

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471 Summary: Misleading error message if /dev/tty permissions wrong Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.4p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734 Summary: Misleading error message when host key verification is impossible / SSH_ASKPASS impossible. Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.6.1p2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 Component: ssh

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2005-04-24

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2507 Bug ID: 2507 Summary: missing or misleading error messages Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.1p1 Hardware: Sparc OS: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2554 Bug ID: 2554 Summary: UseDNS documentation is misleading Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Documentation Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

On 22/01/16 14:38, Ian Campbell wrote: > Debian bug 812166[0] reported this build failure due to > Wmisleading-indentation with gcc-6: > > non-fatal.c: In function 'init_nonfatal_mce_checker': > non-fatal.c:103:2: error: statement is indented as if it were guarded by... [-Werror=misleading-indentation] > switch (c->x86_vendor) { > ^~~~~~ > >

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 05:28:58PM -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > This is pretty misleading. Isn't Stream just a collection of repos that > offer pre-release packages for the next RHEL point release? It's not a > midstream between Fedora and RHEL. Along those lines, if someone's adjusting text in there, I'd tend to think "rolling release" indicates that one

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 4:05 AM Brian Stinson <brian at bstinson.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 4, 2020, at 14:26, Mason Loring Bliss wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 05:28:58PM -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > > This is pretty misleading. Isn't Stream just a collection of repos that > > offer pre-release packages for the next RHEL point release? It's not a