similar to: [osol-help] ZFS two way replication

Hi, I am facing issue with zfs destroy, this takes almost 3 Hours to delete the snapshot of size 150G. Could you please help me to resolve this issue, why zfs destroy takes this much time. While taking snapshot, it''s done within few seconds. I have tried with removing with old snapshot but still problem is same. =========================== I am using : Release : OpenSolaris

Hey all, I''m setting up a ZFS based fileserver to use both as a shared network drive and separately to have an iSCSI target to be used as the "Hard disk" of a windows based VM runninf on another machine. I''ve built the machine, installed the OS, created the RAIDZ pool and now have a couple of questions (I''m pretty much new to Solaris by the way but have been

It was rumored that Nevada build 105 would have ZFS encrypted file systems integrated into the main source. In reviewing the Change logs (URL''s below) I did not see anything mentioned that this had come to pass. Its going to be another week before I have a chance to play with b105. Does anyone know specifically if b105 has ZFS encryption? Thanks, Jerry -------- Original Message

Hello, I have been asked to take a look at at poll on a old OSOL 2009.06 host. It have been left unattended for a long time and it was found in a FAULTED state. Two of the disks in the raildz2 pool seems to have failed, one have been replaced by a spare, the other one is UNAVAIL. The machine was restarted and the damaged disks was removed to make it possible to access the pool without it hanging

Hello Nico, Friday, January 19, 2007, 7:53:06 PM, you wrote: NVdM> Hi, NVdM> Looking if someone already found a solution, or workaround, to change the GUID of a zfs pool. NVdM> Explain me some more in depth, by use of tools like ShadowImage NVdM> on storage Arrays like the Sun Storagetek 99xx (but also for SUN NVdM> related storage Arrays or IBM, EMC and other storage vendors)

UNIX admin wrote: >> Adding crypto to ZFS isn''t that hard once we have >> IEEE 1619 mode >> (AES LRW) implemented in the crypto framework aes >> module(s). >> >> Dealing with the key management is very hard because >> thats the critical >> bit to making it both usable and secure. > > (Scratching head) > If I had to solve this

It was rumored that Nevada build 105 would have ZFS encrypted file systems integrated into the main source. In reviewing the Change logs (URL''s below) I did not see anything mentioned that this had come to pass. Its going to be another week before I have a chance to play with b105. Does anyone know specifically if b105 has ZFS encryption? Thanks, Jerry -------- Original Message

Hello, when I run ''zfs send'' into the file, system (Ultra Sparc 45) had this load: # zfs send -R backup/zones at moving_09112009 > /tank/archive_snapshots/exa_all_zones_09112009.snap Total: 107 processes, 951 lwps, load averages: 54.95, 59.46, 50.25 Is it normal? Regards, Jan Hlodan

On 29/10/2007, Tek Bahadur Limbu <teklimbu at wlink.com.np> wrote: > I created a ZFS file system like the following with /mypool/cache being > the partition for the Squid cache: > > 18:51:27 root at solaris:~$ zfs list > NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT > mypool 478M 31.0G 10.0M /mypool > mypool/cache 230M 9.78G 230M

this is off list on purpose ? > run zpool import, it will search all attached storage and give you a list > of availible pools. then run zpool import poolname or add a -f if you > didn''t export before the install/upgrade. assume worst case someone walks up to you and drops an array on you. They say "its ZFS an'' I need that der stuff ''k? " all

Yesterday morning I awoke to alerts from my SAN that one of my OS disks was faulty, FMA said it was in hardware failure. By the time I got to work (1.5 hours after the email) ALL of my pools were in a degraded state, and "tank" my primary pool had kicked in two hot spares because it was so discombobulated. ------------------- EMAIL ------------------- List of faulty resources:

Please note: this is a "cross posting" of sorts, from a post I made; http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.solaris/browse_thread/thread/a8bd4aab3918b7a0/528dacb05c970748 It was suggested that I mention it here. so I am doing so. For convenience, here is mostly a duplicate of what I posted, with a couple of minor updates. Please note: I''m not asking for technical help on

Just installed Nexenta and I''ve been playing around with zfs. root at hzsilo:/tank# uname -a SunOS hzsilo 5.11 NexentaOS_20070105 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris root at hzsilo:/tank# zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT home 89.5K 219G 32K /export/home tank 330K 1.78T 51.9K /tank tank/iscsi_luns 147K

Hi everyone, I have just installed Solaris and have added a 3x500GB raidz drive array. I am able to use this pool (''tank'') successfully locally, but when I try to share it remotely, I can only read, I cannot execute or write. I didn''t do anything other than the default ''zfs set sharenfs=on tank''... how can I get it so that any allowed user can access

Hi everyone, I have just installed Solaris and have added a 3x500GB raidz drive array. I am able to use this pool (''tank'') successfully locally, but when I try to share it remotely, I can only read, I cannot execute or write. I didn''t do anything other than the default ''zfs set sharenfs=on tank''... how can I get it so that any allowed user can access

Hi, Is it expected that if I have filesystem tank/foo and tank/foo/bar (mounted under /tank) then in order to be able to browse via /net down into tank/foo/bar I need to have group/other permissions on /tank/foo open? # zfs create tank/foo # zfs create tank/foo/bar # chown gavinm /tank/foo /tank/foo/bar # zfs set sharenfs=rw tank/foo # ls -laR /tank/foo /tank/foo: total 9 drwxr-xr-x 3 gavinm

Hy all, recently I upgraded to S10U8 a T5120 using LU. The system had a zones configured and at time of upgrade procedure the zones was still alive and worked fine. The LU procedure was ended successfully. Zones on the system was installed in a ZFS filesystem. Here the result at the end of LU (ABE-from: s10Aug2007, ABE-to: s10Set2009): # zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT

Hi all, we have just bought a sun X2200M2 (4GB / 2 opteron 2214 / 2 disks 250GB SATA2, solaris 10 update 4) and a sun STK 2540 FC array (8 disks SAS 146 GB, 1 raid controller). The server is attached to the array with a single 4 Gb Fibre Channel link. I want to make a mirror using ZFS with this array. I have created 2 volumes on the array in RAID0 (stripe of 128 KB) presented to the host

Hi, I want to move all the ZFS fs from one pool to another, but I don''t want to "gain" an extra level in the folder structure on the target pool. On the source zpool I used zfs snapshot -r tank at moveTank on the root fs and I got a new snapshot in all sub fs, as expected. Now, I want to use zfs send -R tank at moveTank | zfs recv targetTank/... which would place all zfs fs

http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=752 Summary: zfs set keysource no longer works on existing pools Classification: Development Product: zfs-crypto Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P1 Component: other AssignedTo: