Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "RE: Differences in performance between file and LVMbased images"
2001 Sep 24
2
Undeliverable Mail
Mail delivery failed: recipient does not exist.
Tip: Did you mean @iribarren.net?
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will
2006 Mar 07
8
[PATCH] xm,xend: flesh out xm sched-sedf
This patch
-Displays[1] current parameters for running domains ala xm list
-Allow users to set[2] one or more parameters[3] without having to
provide values for parameters they do not wish to change
-Adds additional testing of sched-sedf via new xm-test testcases.
With this patch applied, test 02_sedf_period_lower_neg.py exposes a
bug[4]. I''ll follow up this email with a patch for
2010 Apr 08
1
[LLVMdev] compiler-rt's arm vfp o<= implementation
The implementation of an float ordered <= looks buggy, but maybe I'm not
reading the assembly right. This is lesf2vfp.S in compiler-rt, and it has
this code:
// extern int __lesf2vfp(float a, float b);
//
// Returns one iff a <= b and neither is NaN.
// Uses Darwin calling convention where single precision arguments are passsed
// like 32-bit ints
//
2019 Aug 27
2
TargetRegisterInfo::getCommonSubClass bug, perhaps.
Hi,
ABCRegister.td :
def SGPR32 : RegisterClass<"ABC", [i32], 16, (add
S0, S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, S9, S10, S11,
S12, S13, S14, S15
)>;
def SFGPR32 : RegisterClass<"ABC", [f32], 16, (add
S0, S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, S9, S10, S11,
S12, S13, S14, S15
)>;
===== Instruction selection ends:
...
t8: i32 = ADDrr t37, t32
2010 Apr 09
0
[LLVMdev] compiler-rt's arm vfp o<= implementation
On 8 April 2010 02:28, Rodolph Perfetta <rodolph.perfetta at arm.com> wrote:
> movhi means mov if unsigned Higher
>
> movls means mov if unsigned Lower or Same
>
>
>
> so depending on the comparison result r0 holds 1 or 0
>
Thanks. Now that I understand the assembly, I think there's another problem.
libgcc's definition of lesf2 is actually
2003 Jun 25
2
openssh-3.6.1p2-passexpire20.patch prevents /etc/nologin disp lay on AIX
Courtesy follow up back to the unix-dev list (mainly for those like me who
searched the archives)
Thanks to the very swift response of Darren, a patched auth.c did the trick
Patch enclosed below (apply after the p20)
I'm guessing he'll either update p20 or issue p21 soon.
Many thanks
Andrew
--- auth.c.orig 2003-06-25 23:14:16.000000000 +1000
+++ auth.c 2003-06-25
2010 Sep 20
1
ERROR: Object not found
Dear All,
I am trying to use ode solver "rk4" to solve an ODE system, however, it
keeps saying: Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : object "dIN" not found.
The sample codes are enclosed as follows, please help me. Thank you very
much!
rm(list=ls())
library(odesolve)
# The ODE system
ode <- function(t,x,p){
with(as.list(c(x,p)),{
2010 Sep 20
1
Ask for help with Error: Object not found
Dear All,
I am trying to use ode solver "rk4" to solve an ODE system, however, it
keeps saying: Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : object "dIN" not found.
The sample codes are enclosed as follows, please help me. Thank you very
much!
rm(list=ls())
library(odesolve)
# The ODE system
ode <- function(t,x,p){
with(as.list(c(x,p)),{
2012 Jun 22
2
[xen-unstable test] 13339: regressions - FAIL
flight 13339 xen-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/13339/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin 9 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 13025
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf 9 guest-start
2011 Dec 07
0
[xen-unstable test] 10413: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass
flight 10413 xen-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/10413/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking:
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 3 host-install(3) broken
test-amd64-i386-win 8 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 10201
test-i386-i386-win 8 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 10201
2011 Dec 20
0
sedf: remove useless tracing printk and harmonize comments style.
sched_sedf.c used o have its own mechanism for producing tracing-alike
kind of information (domain block, wakeup, etc.). Nowadays, with an even
not so high number of pCPUs/vCPUs, just trying to enable this makes
the serial console completely unusable, produces tons of very hard to
parse and interpreet logging and can easily livelock Dom0. Moreover,
pretty much the same result this is struggling to
2013 Jan 13
0
[xen-unstable test] 14916: regressions - FAIL
flight 14916 xen-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/14916/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-pv 15 guest-stop fail REGR. vs. 14856
test-amd64-i386-xl 14 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs. 14856
test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 7
2007 Apr 18
2
How to change the scheduler? (credit)
Hi!
I`m using xen 3.0.2 on a Debian Sarge 3,1 (XEON machine)!
By default my scheduler is "sedf", ok?!
I would like to change it to the "credit"!
I tried to set the parameter "sched=credit" in my grub config, but
when I try to use the command "xm sched-credit -d <domain>" and
others, it doesn`t work!
But if I try "xm sched-sedf -l" it
2012 Mar 27
0
[xen-unstable test] 12445: regressions - FAIL
flight 12445 xen-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/12445/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-oldkern 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 12437
build-i386 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 12437
build-amd64 4 xen-build
2016 Nov 05
0
Avago (LSI) SAS-3 controller, poor performance on CentOS 7
On 11/5/2016 12:08 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 11/05/2016 06:40 AM, Steven Tardy wrote:
>> What firmware is/are on the cards?
>
> In the dmesg output I included:
> mpt3sas0: LSISAS3008: FWVersion(10.00.00.00), ChipRevision(0x02),
> BiosVersion(08.25.00.00)
>
>> The driver version difference between C6 and C7 could interact badly
>> with old firmware.
>
2012 Sep 17
1
[xen-4.2-testing test] 13798: regressions - FAIL
flight 13798 xen-4.2-testing real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/13798/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 13739
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 13739
Regressions which are regarded as
2012 Feb 10
1
[xen-unstable test] 11929: regressions - trouble: blocked/fail/pass/preparing/queued/running
flight 11929 xen-unstable running [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/11929/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-i386-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 <none executed> queued
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 <none executed> queued
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64
2012 Dec 19
1
"For" loop and "if" question
All -
I have a large data frame that looks like
ID p1 p2 p3...p20 Lat1 Lat2 Lat3...Lat20
Long1 Long2 Long3...Long20
1 0 0 1 0 NA NA 29.xx NA
NA NA -89.xx NA
2 1 0 0 1 27.xx NA NA 29.00
-88.00 NA NA -89.xx
3 0 0 0 0 NA
2012 Mar 19
0
[qemu-upstream-unstable test] 12357: trouble: blocked/broken
flight 12357 qemu-upstream-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/12357/
Failures and problems with tests :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-oldkern 2 host-install(2) broken REGR. vs. 11890
build-i386 2 host-install(2) broken REGR. vs. 11890
2013 Oct 01
0
[linux-3.4 test] 19896: regressions - FAIL
flight 19896 linux-3.4 real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/19896/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 19840
build-amd64 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 19840
Tests which did not succeed, but are not