similar to: Webmin module for Shorewall?

I am working on something that works with freeswan. If you are interested, I would be glad to send a copy and the details. -----Original Message----- From: shorewall-users-request@shorewall.net [mailto:shorewall-users-request@shorewall.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:01 PM To: shorewall-users@shorewall.net Subject: Shorewall-users digest, Vol 1 #105 - 3 msgs Send Shorewall-users mailing

Added an article about shorewall to our site. See it at: http://www.dyersinc.com/linux_stuff.htm Thanks again! Sincerely, Jim Hubbard - Project Manager, V.P. E-mail: jimh@dyersinc.com Dyer''s, Inc. 233 S. Hamilton St., P.O. Box 707 Eden, NC 27288 (336)623-6969 phone (336)627-9898 fax Visit us online at www.dyersinc.com

My description of the incorrect use of the term ''SNAT'' on the Static NAT Webmin page was apparently misunderstood. Attached is a patch against the Webmin-1.070 Shorewall module that corrects this problem and also adds the ''DNAT-'' action for rules. To apply the patch, you will need the ''patch'' utility: cd <webmin shorewall directory - on

I just updated my webmin on my server and noticed that the module for Shorewall looked different. It looks like someone really cleaned it up and had it added to the Standard Webmin Module list. Woohoo. -- Joe *** I can only please one person a day. Today is not your day and tomorrow doesn''t look good either. ***

I just updated my webmin on my server and noticed that the module for Shorewall looked different. It looks like someone really cleaned it up and had it added to the Standard Webmin Module list. Woohoo. -- Joe *** I can only please one person a day. Today is not your day and tomorrow doesn''t look good either. ***

Hiya, > You would look on the Webmin site for that. I have absolutely nothing > to > do with the development or support of the Webmin Shorewall module. The > development of the Webmin Shorewall module does not track the > development of Shorewall so it is very unlikely that you will ever > find > a Webmin module that supports the current Shorewall version > completely.

Hello People I''m new here, so forgive-me for any "newbie talk". My client is running Debian Sarge (Stable), with Shorewall and Webmin. I want to make things easier for them and tried to use the webmin-shorewall module. The thing is - the installed shorewall is 3.0.5 (package from testing) but the webmin module only understands (and builds) the old shorewall 2.x file

I have registered a project with Sourceforge to produced a Webmin module for Shorewall. http://sourceforge.net/projects/webmin-shorewal/ Anyone interested in participating please email me at enemyofthestate at users.sourceforge.net I am still learning the interface but I think I need your Sourceforge Nym to add you as a developer. -- Stephen Carville Unix and Network Adminstrator

I''m having problems using shorewall webmin module and Redirect rules. Webmin module does NOT accept the symbol ! in the field "Destination address for DNAT or REDIRECT". So the example that comes in rule file to redirect www from local zone to 3128 port can only be included manualy. The example suggest to exclude the fw ip addres " !192.168.2.2 " Shorewall version:

While the subject is new features, here''s something I''d like to see. I''d like to have a way for shorewall to be able to monitor a log file and take an action when a condition is met. For instance, if Shorewall could monitor /var/log/httpd/access_log for entries which I have defined (and know to be an attack), and then take an action such as blacklisting a host or domain

Great piece of software there... Just a few minor problems. First, the sourceforge site doesn''t seem to be kept up to date. This should be pointed out more (Sourceforge probably shouldn''t be the first mirror either). It caused me some long hours trying to solve a bug in 1.4.6, thinking this was the latest version, when in fact this bug was solved in 1.4.8 (routeback for if+).

> One thing : the shorewall is not starting at boot, how to do it ? Did you remove the "startup_disabled" file from the /etc/shorewall directory? yes, thsi file was removed ... F?bio Rabelo

What about Webmin Module compatbility ? If I do not create any rule violating any of that new features, it will work ? Or the module is unusable until someone make necessary modifications ? F?bio Rabelo

Hello, I am not able to open the webmin web interface on my server. Shorewall is blocking it. How to allow it on the server. Thanks Varun

Hello, I have had a lot of success installing/configuring shorewall on my own system using webmin. Recently, I have been contracted to do some remote admin on a isp co-lo box all through a webmin server index connection from my locally running webmin server connected to the remote server. I was able to download shorewall from: http://shorewall.infohiiway.com/pub/shorewall/LATEST.rpm but when

Is there any text console base config tool for shorewall ? I know that there is a webmin module but I don''t want to install webmin to minmize any security problem.

Joshua Schmidlkofer wrote: > Tom Eastep wrote: > >> Joshua Schmidlkofer wrote: >> >>> Tom, >>> >>> Here is the setup method w/ Bridging on Gentoo. >>> >> >> Thanks, Joshua >> >> -Tom > > > Off topic - Has anyone cooked up a good web front end? I am messing w/ > IPCop, because one of my clients uses it.

Hello!!1 Everyone My shorewall version is 2.1.9. When i used one interface sample (http://slovakia.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Samples/samples-2.0.1/one-interface.tgz)to start my firewall (192.168.11.6), i cannot used another computer to login Webmin or ssh (192.168.11.5). So, what can i do ?

My company has, very generously, donated a space on their rack and a server for me to use for development of a more up to date Shorewall webmin interface. Based on the advice here, I''ve also signed up for a sourceforge account, and will register the project later today. I would like to solicit the help of a few people on here who are willing to help move this project along. There were

Hi, I created a modification (more like a hack) to shorewall that backups a configuration after succesfully (re)starting it. In case a future (re)start fails it will use this backup configuration. (instead of stopping the firewall and generating a massive ammount phonecalls ;) I didn''t pay too much attention to the ramifications of this patch, so let me know if i screwed anything up.