similar to: Maximum Listeners.

Hi, I?ve been trying to increase the number of open files for the dovecot user on Debian 9 and have so far, failed! I?ve tried this: # cat /etc/security/limits.d/limits_dovecot.conf dovecot soft nofile 2048 dovecot hard nofile 8192 # cat /etc/systemd/system/dovecot.service.d/service.conf LimitNOFILE=8192 But to no avail: # prlimit -p 27208|grep -i

We have CENTOS 4.7 on DELL server. our /etc/security/limits.conf already setup as: * soft nproc 2047 * hard nproc 16384 * soft nofile 4096 * hard nofile 65536 oracle soft nproc 2047 oracle hard nproc 16384 oracle soft nofile 8192

Do you check the system log of Centos? > Op 12 apr. 2019 om 22:38 heeft Paul Martin <pm at nowster.me.uk> het volgende geschreven: > > Seeing as you're running systemd, you might want to look at the > Journal too: > > journalctl -u icecast2 > > -- > Paul Martin <pm at nowster.me.uk> > _______________________________________________ > Icecast

I posted a few days back asking about configuration issues with a modestly large number of IMAP connections. Several people were kind enough to respond with various ideas. Armed with those ideas and Google, I was able to determine the underlying configuration issues with CentOS 7 and Dovecot 2.2.10. I did some further benchmarking to ensure that we could properly plan our server

On 20 Sep 2016, at 3:10, Chen Wei Hsu wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to stream for over 1k users on Ubuntu 16.04. I notice that > when > stream connection is over 1024, it get warning like this: > > WARN connection/_accept_connection accept() failed with error 24: Too > many > open files > > Tried these configs and reboot, it won't work! >

It all looks like a workarounds. I would suggest using a proper solution, such as systemd, that is present in ubuntu 16.04 by default, and where you can raise system limits per system service just by tweaking its config file. m. On 8 października 2016 at 11:37:59, Chen Wei Hsu (cwhsu1984 at gmail.com) wrote: Hi all, I am trying to stream for over 1k users on Ubuntu 16.04. I notice that when

Hi all, I am trying to stream for over 1k users on Ubuntu 16.04. I notice that when stream connection is over 1024, it get warning like this: WARN connection/_accept_connection accept() failed with error 24: Too many open files Tried these configs and reboot, it won't work! /etc/pam.d/common-session session required pam_limits.so /etc/sysctl.conf fs.file-max = 100000

Hi Louis, Thanks for information, find it sometimes is a real challenge. Would you please share your how to link? I wish to read it. For the .local domain I suppose I have nothing to do. This is a running windows Active Directory and it is not possible to change domain suffix. Here is my /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost 10.254.104.8 wdc04.aa.local wdc04 10.254.105.208

Hello, If it is on a (VMware) virtual machine, maybe the network capacity or cpu capacity might be consumed by other virtual machines ? Could there be a backup process running on the other machines ? Henk Van: Icecast [mailto:icecast-bounces at xiph.org] Namens Pedro M. Oliveira Verzonden: vrijdag 12 april 2019 21:32 Aan: icecast at xiph.org Onderwerp: [Icecast] Something not good.

We recently switched over mail servers to one running dovecot and postfix on RedHat Enterprise 6. The mail store is NFS on a NetApp filer, the index files are on local disk. We have about 6000 total active users, though not all of them access the system at the same time. All goes well for a while, then we start seeing errors like this in the log: dovecot: imap-login: Error:

I am using CALDERA OPENLINUX 3.1.1 with latest patches and Samba 2.2.5 on it. But recently I start to receive linux error "kernel: VFS MAX FILES REACHED" and Samba error "Too many open files". After it I tuning linux increase open files descriptors in /etc/security/limits.conf * soft nproc 4094 * hard nproc 16384 * soft

在 2017年05月25日 18:37, Daniel P. Berrange 写道: > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 06:20:51PM +0800, dw wrote: >> Hi: >> >> I'm trying to connect with libvirtd with virsh from a remote PC,but only >> can establish 1000 connections. >> >> If try more connections,prompt: >> >> "error: failed to connect to the hypervisor >>

Sure there is, Install debian, follow my howto and you will have success. Just, your using an .local domain, and thats a reserved name for apples mDNS (zeroconf) And should not be used. ( same for .lan ) https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/FAQ#Can_I_Use_the_.local_Top-level_Domain_for_My_AD_DNS_Zone.3F So the info is good, thats not the problem, finding it, is. Can you post your /etc/hosts

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 06:51:40PM +0800, dw wrote: > 在 2017年05月25日 18:37, Daniel P. Berrange 写道: > > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 06:20:51PM +0800, dw wrote: > > > Hi: > > > > > > I'm trying to connect with libvirtd with virsh from a remote PC,but only > > > can establish 1000 connections. > > > > > > If try more

It's a test for the new interceptor for prlimit. It could be disabled with __GLIBC_PREREQ for 2.13+. On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > +Evgenii for msan. > > I suspect the community simply doesn't keep track of what glibc > version is required :-/ > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at

Hello all, could anyone explain the exact meaning of parameter nproc? Why different values of nproc give so different critical values, i.e. meanL2BB$computeCritval(0.05,nproc=3) [1] 0.9984853 meanL2BB$computeCritval(0.05,nproc=1) [1] 0.4594827 The strucchange-package description gives "integer specifying for which number of processes Brownian motions should be simulated" - do I need

When I tested rc1 I found that some of the test suite wouldn't build on SLES11.3 as a consequence of changes to the tests. At least some of the msan tests have been changed leverage features of glibc newer than is available on this platform. I asked about a minimum-required glibc but didn't hear back. Is the minimum required glibc for 3.9 different from 3.8? When I tried rc1 on

I am using a member server with AD as my source of accounts. ssh logins work great. Yesterday, one of my students wanted to see what a fork bomb was and so now I need to place ulimits on place. Attempts to use AD domain groups fail. So I'm not sure this is an issue for samba+winbind or for /etc/security/limits.conf and pam. Here's what I have added in limits.conf # -- fix fork bomb

Hi, Can modifications to /etc/security/limits.conf cause top process to be automatically killed. First, Here is the contents of the /etc/security/limits.conf * hard cpu 2 * soft nproc 5 * hard nproc 10 mailnull hard nproc 100 What i have noticed that top process is always killed, But