similar to: PESQ results for speex 1.0.3

Francois Menard (Mailing List Account) wrote: > > did you try speex in wideband mode ... what bitrate? > > f. 15kbps mode. It does significantly better with a different speaker (the male does better than the female), as well. I'm considering purchasing a commercial PESQ license and wrap the PESQ software in a server application. I could then allow other folks to run PESQ

Hello! My company makes testing software that, among other things, can be used to generate file-system traffic. In order to better support Samba, I need to make a few changes to the way samba mounts file systems: 1) I need to be able to specify the local IP address for the socket connection. This will allow me to bind different mounts to different local interfaces. This information will

Hello! I'm about to try to integrate SPEEX into the VOCAL project. If anyone has any pointers as to the best way to do this, please let me know. After reading the speex api man page, I have a few questions: 1) To encode, it appears I need an array of floats. If I am playing wav files, what is the best way to turn these into something speex can encode? 2) Are there any commercially

B. Mitchell Loebel wrote: > Hello LWATCDR: > > OK with me, but 1) I'm a Microsoft stockholder and 2) I'm not going to > stand still for people trashing Capitalist successes!! 'Nuff said. How about if I sell you a copy of speex. Buy low, sell high seems like a good capitalist plan, and then you could feel good about using Speex! Ben -- Ben Greear

This portion of the RFC is gramatically incorrect and confusing: The RTP payload MUST be padded to provide an integer number of octets as the payload length. These padding bits MUST be all zero. This padding is only required for the last frame in the packet, and only to ensure the packet contents ends on an octet boundary. <p> -- Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>

Hii All, VLAN is create in manageable switch, like Cisco Catalyst and other vlan cap= able switch. eac port in that switch can be assigned in different VLAN. so,= that switch capable to insert 802_1q to each incoming frame (Please correc= t if its wrong, i just newbie in VLAN).I want build VLAN but i don't have v= lan capable switch. Is possible to create a vlan capable switch using switc=

Hello all, i would like to build a setup to generate VLAN frames (respecting the IEEE 802.1Q standard) for testing purpose. How to configure a Linux bridge for it to become a VLAN switch? Is it possible? What user tool to use for that? brctl? Regards, Louis

Hello, I'd like to change some network variables (bandwidth, delay, packet loss) to measure how speex behaves in certain conditions. Do you recommend any tools you may use in speex development? It seems NIST Net isn't maintained anymore. I've found dummynet, looks interesting, but any hints you guys may have would be most welcome... Thanks, -- Adriano

-----Original Message----- >From: Tommy Christensen [mailto:tommy.christensen@tpack.net] >Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 10:09 AM >To: Christian Darnell >Cc: 'Linux 802.1Q VLAN'; Bart De Schuymer; netdev@oss.sgi.com; bridge >Subject: Re: [Bridge] RE: [VLAN] Re: [PATCH/RFC] Let {ip, arp}tables >"see" bridged VLAN tagged{I,AR}P packets > > > >This

Ben Greear wrote: > Well, it seems we could and should fix veth to work, but it will have > to do equivalent work of copying an skb most likely, so either way > you'll probably get a big performance hit. Using the same pktgen script (i.e with clone=0) I see that a veth-->bridge-->veth configuration gives about 400K PPS forwarding performance where

Ben Greear wrote: > Well, it seems we could and should fix veth to work, but it will have > to do equivalent work of copying an skb most likely, so either way > you'll probably get a big performance hit. Using the same pktgen script (i.e with clone=0) I see that a veth-->bridge-->veth configuration gives about 400K PPS forwarding performance where

1. I really HATE POLITICS. 2. I think Speex is a great solution to the problem of compressing human speech. 3. Good heavens people can we please stop throwing around words like communist and socialism. 4. Government funded research has done a lot for the US and other countries. Going all the way back to the NACA cowling and airfoils that where vital in the development of airliners and the fighters

We try to disable NAPI to prevent a single XDP TX queue being used by multiple cpus. But we don't check if device is up (NAPI is enabled), this could result stall because of infinite wait in napi_disable(). Fixing this by checking device state through netif_running() before. Fixes: 4941d472bf95b ("virtio-net: do not reset during XDP set") Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at

We try to disable NAPI to prevent a single XDP TX queue being used by multiple cpus. But we don't check if device is up (NAPI is enabled), this could result stall because of infinite wait in napi_disable(). Fixing this by checking device state through netif_running() before. Fixes: 4941d472bf95b ("virtio-net: do not reset during XDP set") Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at

Hello, I am creating a configuration where a Redhat server running bridge-tools 0.9.5 will be bridging between different VLANs on the same physical interface (for example: a bridge consisting of eth1.100 and eth1.110). This physical interface is being connected to modern Cisco switches running PVST+. The Cisco switch does not like this configuration as the tags on its BPDUs are being changed

Hello! I recently started testing curl's tftp options, and found that it crashed when trying to upload files using tftp because it didn't handle OACK properly. So, I'm attempting to fix it. Now, I have an endless loop: The client (my hacked curl) sends TFTP write request with options, server responds with OACK (tsize, blksize) client sends data packet, block 0 BUT: server responds

Hello! I am trying to set up multi-link PPP using two T100P cards in one machine, and 1 T405P card (the 4-port one) in another machine. I have previously been able to get PPP working between the two T100P cards in separate machines.... The 4-port card seems to be my problem currently. I am trying to use the tor2 driver (from a fresh CVS download this morning). When I load the driver (or run

While working on adding support for local-binding, I found this piece of code in libmsrpc.c. Maybe I'm confused..but should that strcmp maybe be compared to != 0? /*change the server name in the server handle if necessary*/ if(srv && hnd->server && strcmp(hnd->server, srv) == 0) { SAFE_FREE(hnd->server); hnd->server = SMB_STRDUP(srv); }

> Use an Intel pro/100 or pro/1000 driver..they are known to > work with VLANs. > > I guess it's also possible that it's a problem in the > bridging code, so try the latest kernel > as well... I compiled the latest 2.6.19 kernel and tested it with two 3COM 3c905c fast ethernet interfaces which work fine with vlan 802.1q tagging, but when I have added the eth0 and eth1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, I have a *very* strange problem, unfortunately it's kind of a show stopper regarding the deployment of the machine. :( I have two Intel Gigabit Ethernet NICs on board (Supermicro-based Server), quoting lspci (full output see at the end of the email): 0d:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82573E Gigabit Ethernet Controller