similar to: Shorewall development and announcement lists moving to SourceForge

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Shorewall development and announcement lists moving to SourceForge"

2005 Jul 07
0
Shorewall users mailing list moved to SourceForge.net
Hi folks, As the subject says, the Shorewall users mailing list has been moved to SourceForge.net. I''m still manually processing a number of subscribe and unsubscribe requests that have occurred since we requested the import. The list archives are now available via: http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=22587 and you can manage your subscription to the new list at:
2006 Mar 02
4
The inaugural Shorewall survey!
Greetings to all of the Shorewall community! We''d like to find out a little more about the environments in which Shorewall runs, and to this end i''ve created a survey. It is mostly designed to allow Shorewall users to see how their environment compares with that of the average Shorewall user (if such a thing exists!), but the results may be used by the Shorewall team to assist
2003 May 21
1
Order sensitivity in shorewall configs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi folks (mostly Tom), In which shorewall configs is the ordering of entries significant? I know about rules & policies, and if i remember correctly zones under some circumstances (when one is a sub-zone of another), but are there any others? I am trying to work out (for my multi-firewall preprocessing script) whether i need to process
2004 Apr 24
0
Announce: shoregen 0.1.1 release
Hi folks, As requested earlier in the week, i''ve done some cleaning on my little script to manage shorewall configurations across multiple firewalls, and the results are available now. You can find a (rather banal) pointer at: http://paulgear.webhop.net/linux/#shoregen Download it at: http://paulgear.webhop.net/linux/RPMS/noarch/shoregen-0.1.1-1.noarch.rpm For you non-RPM types,
2005 May 29
1
devel.shorewall.net
Hi folks, Over the weekend Ron has made some good progress with functionality available at http://devel.shorewall.net, and i''ve converted all of the content i had placed at http://shorewall.dyndns.org (which is now a redirect to the former). Please have a look around and give your feedback, either here or on the site itself. -- Paul <http://paulgear.webhop.net> -- Did you know?
2005 Jun 24
4
Chat servers?
Anyone know how/where we can get some? It has been raised before: http://lists.shorewall.net/pipermail/shorewall-users/2004-July/013594.html I''d like to see an IRC or Jabber service for both support and development. -- Paul <http://paulgear.webhop.net> -- Did you know? OpenOffice.org has built-in PDF creation. Better yet, it''s compatible with Microsoft Office, and
2003 May 10
2
LAST LINE business
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, Quick question: can anyone remember the reason why all the config files end in ''#LAST LINE -- ADD YOUR ENTRIES ABOVE THIS LINE -- DO NOT REMOVE'' or something similar? I''m starting work on a shorewall preprocessor that will allow multiple firewalls to be administered from a single system (not a GUI, though), and
2005 May 27
10
Help wanted notices
Hi folks, I''ve added a couple of ''help wanted'' ads to our SourceForge project. You can see them at http://sourceforge.net/people/?group_id=22587 I''ll add more as i have the opportunity. If you can think of other jobs we need to assign, please let me know. -- Paul <http://paulgear.webhop.net> -- Did you know? Using accepted quoting conventions makes
2005 Jun 24
13
Test environments?
Hi folks, When we first started talking about Shorewall post-Tom, a few people offered to help with testing. Would those people please raise their hands again? :-) I''m investigating Nicolas Helleringer''s recent message on shorewall-users (http://lists.shorewall.net/pipermail/shorewall-users/2005-June/018898.html), and a good test environment would come in really handy,
2005 May 26
11
Quick poll: CVS commits
Hi folks, I''m conducting a straw poll for your opinions on whether we should send CVS commit logs (probably with diffs) to the shorewall-devel list, or to another (new) list? I can see advantages to both ways: separate lists mean that people who aren''t contributing code don''t get flooded with code noise, but a single list will help keep everyone involved in the
2003 Jan 30
4
ACCEPT vs DNAT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, Can someone refresh my memory on the difference between the following (where dmz contains an RFC 1918 address host)? ACCEPT net dmz tcp 80 - all DNAT net dmz tcp 80 I''m trying to generate a script for maintaining multiple interconnected firewalls from shared policy, rules, and zone files, and i
2005 Jun 03
0
Re: routestopped doc error
Lars Jensen wrote: > Hi paul, > > The documentation for the routestopped configuration file at > http://shorewall.sourceforge.net/Documentation.htm#Routestopped says > that the host must be listed separated by commas. If this is done, an > error occurs upon reboot, and shorewall doesn''t load at all (debian). It > is necessary to include double quotes also, like this:
2007 Aug 13
0
Survey time again?
Hi folks, I''m feeling the need to get an updated feel for where our users are at with respect to Shorewall, and i''m thinking about running a survey again. My thoughts at the moment are that we should have two separate surveys: one to find out about users and their thoughts, and the other to find out about the systems on which Shorewall is running. If you have any thoughts
2005 May 27
3
Re: Shorewall development web site (Mike Noyes)
Hello, I leave for a couple days .. (Well months) and look at what has happened. :-) I would throw my support in behind Xoops .. to be honest .. If a portal is what we are trying to achieve here. I just happen to think that sometimes .. More work goes into web design etc than goes into actual Code. But thats because I am a lamer at web design :-) I am coming in here a bit late .. But tell
2005 May 26
28
Shorewall development web site
Hi folks, Last night and this morning i''ve hacked up a quick web site for coordinating our development work based on Drupal (http://drupal.org). You can find it at: http://shorewall.dyndns.org I''ve put a few ideas in there - feel free to use the comments or sign up for an account and create your own pages (particularly in the two books about development and web site work).
2002 May 14
3
[Shorewall-users] Redirect loc::80 to fw::3128 not work (fwd)
I''m beginning to believe that the use of the last column in the rules file to designate redirection/forwarding is too subtle for many users. For 1.3, I think I''ll do something like the following: Current rule: ACCEPT net loc:192.168.1.3 tcp 80 - all New rule: FORWARD net loc:192.168.1.3 tcp 80 Current rule: ACCEPT net fw::3128 tcp 80 - all New rule: REDIRECT net
2005 Jun 30
10
Long Shorewall Startup Times Revisited
Hello, With reference to the problems listed below. I too am having incredibly long start up times. I''m talking minutes here (around 5 minutes). My configuration is not complex I don''t think. We are you using ldap too and the settings are bellow. The network is up as I''m restarting shorewall whilst the machine is running. Any suggestions? Is there no way to
2005 Jun 01
5
use of shell code in shorewall/params
The params file appears to be simply "sourced" by the firewall script, which means one can put any Bourne shell code into it and it will execute it. This feature isn''t documented, so I''m wondering if it can be documented and thus guaranteed to always work. I''d like to dig out the IP parameters of my interface cards from the ifcfg-eth? files and set shorewall
2003 Oct 02
2
Shorewall 1.4.7 RC2
http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta Problems corrected since RC1: 1) The documentation of the USERSETS column in the rules file has been corrected. 2) If there is no policy defined for the zones specified in a rule, the firewall script previously encountered a shell syntax error: [: NONE: unexpected operator Now, the absence of a
2005 Jan 05
22
Shorewall and IPV6
As 2.2.0 is nearing release, I''ve begun to think about what I''ll do for 2.3 and I think that it is time for Shorewall to add support for IPV6. Because of parsing ambiguities, the need to maintain upward compatibility with both Shorewall and 6Wall, and different available functionality in IPV4 and IPV6 Netfilter, I believe that it is going to be necessary for some files to be