similar to: DNS Scavenging in Samba AD

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.4 (Tikanga) Samba 3.0.33-3.15.el5_4.1 I have run into an issue where the DNS records added by a net ads join seem to be being scavenged. From what I understand, Windows servers/workstations check in (update their host record) on the AD DNS server on a regular basis. So the question is, how can I have samba/winbind do the same? I could just setup a cron

Hi, I would like to know what register scavenging is, but reading RegisterScavenging.h [1] and googling don't help too much. Could someone explain it a little bit (what it is and when we need it), or point me to some nice link, I will be very appreciated. :-) [1] http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/RegisterScavenging_8h_source.html Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Homepage:

So in my case - is it safe to delete directly using ldbdel or using windows ADSI gui ldap editor? Or is there another way? What is the right way to do it? something like: ldbdel -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb -b"DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=mydomain,DC=com '(dNSTombstoned: TRUE)' ? I read in samba 4.9 new features release notes about scavenging but I'm not sure if it's the

Hello, according to this: https://gitlab.com/samba-team/samba/merge_requests/26 samba should support DNS record scavenging is this only true for the internal DNS or also BIND? Should this work? I enabled it (dns zone scavenging = yes) to try it out and got this (didn't enable it from the DNS Manager tool as I got the error first): Jul 24 16:39:20 dc1 samba[29071]: [2019/07/24

So what I realized is that you can't use the simple scavenger trick where you create the virtual register and use the more advanced features. This is because you can't call forward() in any form if there are virtual registers being used by any of the instructions in the basic block. This will cause forward to fail. Maybe this is a bug in forward() On 02/05/2013 02:51 PM, Reed Kotler

I ran into a case in Mips16 where I need two registers. The problem arises from the fact that SP is not a mips16 register. You can implicitly use it in load/store and, move it to/from a mips16 register and add small immediate values to it but that's it. It's not in general a problem for me because there are a bunch of mips32 registers that are hard to use in mips16 so at this time, I

Does not seem that anyone is using the more advanced features of RegScavenger On 02/05/2013 01:09 PM, reed kotler wrote: > I ran into a case in Mips16 where I need two registers. > > The problem arises from the fact that SP is not a mips16 register. > You can implicitly use it in load/store and, move it to/from a mips16 > register and add small immediate values to it but

No. forward() is working correctly. All virtual register references must be resolved before calling it. -Jim On Feb 5, 2013, at 4:05 PM, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > So what I realized is that you can't use the simple scavenger trick where you create the virtual register and use the more advanced features. > > This is because you can't call forward() in any

Hello all, some additional info: Samba version is 4.10.6 on Centos7 with sernet packages. I am using bind_dlz as dns. This happens on all DC regardless if scavening was enabled with the Windows DNS Manager. I enabled one new zone but this still happens. Replication is also not working then as the kcc seqfaults every view seconds. In the release notes it says: This support should however only be

Hi! I have some problems with spill/reload and register scavenging which result in illegal code. As our apps, compiled by LLVM and our backend, become more and more complex we have the following problem with our backend: In most cases registers are spilled on function entry to stack slots and reloaded on function exit. At some points registers are spilled and reloaded via register scavenging.

Hi, I have site running 4.11.0 with internal DNS and we want to turn on DNS scavenging. Looking at the timestamps in DNS MMC they are all over the place and trying to update the timestamp gives a "The record does not exist" error. My question is whether this is supposed to work and whether there is a way to manipulate that data on the command line with samba-tool etc? As a follow-up,

Hello all, we have an AD running Samba 4.12.5 on Centos8 using the packages from sernet. We enabled "Dynamic DNS record scavenging support" as introduced at version 4.9. This works as expected. However, some dynamic updates by the windows and Linux clients (not by the dhcpd server) are marked as static. This is totally random. I routinely delete these entries and sometimes they are

Hello, I'm noticing if a client changes IP's. It registers it's new IP but doesn't update the existing record. So what I see is two A records for the same client but with different IP's in the Microsoft DNS snap in tool. Shouldn't the client update it's existing record and not create a new one? Is this considered normal behavior at the moment? Samba 4.1.13

Hai Mason,   I had a look at the debug output.   on 1) why around 15-16 second, that i really dont know. im trying to figure that out. on 2) if DNS is inconsistance, that everything is unrelayable. This is really the first the that needs fixing. then we look again at the replication.   The debug output still shows several messages about zones in flat files. I still do believe also that this

Is there an option to the net command to not have it update DNS in AD? We are joining servers using the net ads join command and it's changing our static DNS entries to dynamic ones which then get deleted when AD does its DNS scavenging. It seems that dynamically updating DNS is the default. The command we're running is: net ads join -U adminuser%adminpasswd Thanks - Mike Mike

Thanks Jon and Hal for the helpful pointers. By returning true from requiresRegisterScavenging() and requiresFrameIndexScavenging(), LLVM handled all the scavenging effort. That is nearly painless for the target, so why do some targets seem to do scavenging on their own? When the scavenged register is loaded with a simple immediate, is it safe to search the BB and replace other uses of the same

ah yes.. that are the "limitation", but know limitations ( for us ) Rowland, this is something to add on the wiki. (here : https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS_Administration ) ;-) Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Yuriy Tabolin >Verzonden: woensdag 19 augustus 2015 11:35 >Aan: samba at

To answer my own question: Yes, it's seems like a feature. I ran basic ldbsearch query: ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb -b "DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=mydomain,DC=com" and saw in output entries with: dNSTombstoned: TRUE Overall there are a couple hundred entries with as such. So now my question is: How can I safely remove them, any tips/guideliness? I thought that

Hi all, Virtual ISAs such as WebAssembly and NVPTX use infinite virtual register sets instead of traditional phsyical registers. PrologEpilogInserter is run after register allocation and asserts that all virtuals have been allocated but doesn't otherwise depend on this if scavenging is not needed. We'd like to use the target-independent PEI code for WebAssembly, so we're proposing a

I ran into another issue with register scavenger. In my case, I don't need a place on the stack for an emergency spill slot. I have these free mips32 registers, that are not in general very useful for other things, for the emergency spill slot. I can move to and from mips16 (subset of mips32) registers and mips32 registers. I also have a situation where I need two free registers so then