similar to: handling spam from gmail.

I am sick of this gmail spam. Does anyone know a solution where I can do something like this: 1. received email from adcpni444 at gmail.com 2. system recognizes this email address has been 'whitelisted', continue with 7. 3. system recognizes as this email never been seen before 4. auto reply with something like (maybe with a wait time of x hours): Your message did not receive the

This is not a job for dovecot. You should look into whatever is your MTA (exim, postfix etc) and implement the solution there. But my initial suggestion is to check SPF and DKIM of the email. Because I know that gmail does terminate spammers quick, but if you don't validate SPF or DKIM, you might be a victim of spoofed Gmail email. Best regards, Sebastian Nielsen -----Ursprungligt

On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 10:19:50AM +0200, Marc Roos wrote: > > > I am sick of this gmail spam. Does anyone know a solution where I can do > something like this: > > 1. received email from adcpni444 at gmail.com > 2. system recognizes this email address has been 'whitelisted', continue > with 7. > 3. system recognizes as this email never been seen before >

Marc Roos wrote: > > > I am sick of this gmail spam. Does anyone know a solution where I can do > something like this: > > 1. received email from adcpni444 at gmail.com > 2. system recognizes this email address has been 'whitelisted', continue > with 7. > 3. system recognizes as this email never been seen before > 4. auto reply with something like (maybe

Wrong mailing list. You need to ask on the list for the MTA you are using (Sendmail, Postfix, &c). Actually, this sounds like a job for a custom milter, which would look at the domain name of the sending system, and reject the mail with your message. Dunno if there is one that works exactly like this. On 6/11/20 1:19 AM, Marc Roos wrote: > > > I am sick of this gmail spam.

I get two or three of these a day. They are not from Gmail but have a "reply to" address that is a Gmail account. The messages cone from an email account that passes SPF and DKIM. So the sender and reply domains differ, but that isn't unique. I have email that I need that arrives like that. I am on the Postfix list where this does belong, but I looked at the problem and decided it

I know it is not dovecot who should fix this. But anyone using dovecot is using an MTA, and receiving spam ;) I know how to look at email headers. Spf and dkim is not solving anything here. -----Original Message----- From: Sebastian Nielsen [mailto:sebastian at sebbe.eu] Sent: donderdag 11 juni 2020 10:23 To: Marc Roos; 'dovecot'; 'users' Subject: SV: handling spam from

Hi there, after browsing the mailing list archives for several hour I still couldn't find an answer to my problem, although it for sure sounds as if many people posted the same problem. Yet, none of the threads dealing with problems like these matched my problem, so I have to start a new thread on my own. This is my system environment: Linux machine: - Mandrake Linux 8.1 - samba-2.2.1a

Hello. I would like to know if somebody did a wireles voip with Asterisk PBX. I think to deploy a wireless for about 500 potential customers, it's a 3 km radius maximum coverage with houses without phone lines, I work for public places telephony small enterprises ( a common bussines in Spain) so I can get good rates from 4 telcos and do LCR at my asterisk PBX. Is anybody did this before

Your logics sucks. There is a difference between how email works and how spamassassin works. You are assuming that everyone in the world is using spamassassin by including it in 'how email works'. Maybe you like to post a link to your bayes files???? Am 11.06.20 um 11:13 schrieb Marc Roos: > You do not understand how mail works. Google mail is only getting > through when spf

Yes tell that to the people that create rhel6, rhel7 and rhel8 and give lts support. Unless google pays you to train your software to mark their messages as spam, you might want to consider yourself not to smart as well ;) My solution would solve the problem others create (see the other mail). Your solution wastes your time and will always be carrying water to the sea. I think if 50% of

When R prints warnings, they often go "out of the line", it would be better if they where wrapped with writeLines(strwrap ... I tried to do that , changing the function warnings, but it has only effect when called explicitely, not when R prints the warnings unasked. Anyhow, here is the changed warnings: warnings <- function (...) { if (!(n <- length(last.warning)))

Here are a few comments on the new release (1.2.0), most about R CMD check. I have managed to install and check my libraries only making one change to a C function (see point 1) and one to an R function because of the way formulae now look for their data. That is the good news. Of course, more extensive checks are liable to find further problems. 1. I need to be able to define F77_SYMBOL. This

Dear all, I need to build a PBX based on Asterisk for a call center. I have worked with raw Asterisk but it's hard to work for big implementations think. Also I have worked with Trixbox CE for a small bussines and it was prette good, but I have not have many features like ACD. I know there is another version called Trixbox PRO -specially Call Center edition- that's not free but has got

Hi, I'm having high load, choppy sound and slow responsives with an asterisk server (version 1.2.12.1) that make a peak of 90 channels (around 60 phones calling at max, isn't necessary to reach this peak to get the problem). All the traffic is SIP, with recording for every call. The server has: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz (with HyperThreading disabled for inestability) 4G RAM 2 DD SCSI

On 12/12/2016 9:46 AM, Cong Monkey wrote > As title, is that possible to develop a python version of tinc, that > will be interesting:) I'll go out on a limb and say... yes. The unasked question I sense is, "is anyone willing to port tinc to python". I can't speak for anyone else, but personally I'm happy that tinc is written in C. It means I can use it in

Ken Hamer (B83 131) <K.Hamer@axion.bt.co.uk> wrote > BUT...... After printing a document, Samba appears to hang up the connection, > although another seems to start pretty quickly. ... > server.netbios- client.1065 8557 0 8760 0 CLOSE_WAIT > > The connection will stay in this state until the user tries to access > something on the network drive

Hi, I started using linux (Ubuntu 10.04) in my bussines 3 months ago. Replacing my windows machines. Up to now, was all stright forward, and without problems. I am using wine (with all it's recomended upgrades). I use wine, because I have a little visual fox program that runs the invoices and stuff like that. Until yesterday, I was printing normally. No problems at all, and quite happy.

Thanks a lot you both, I'll try to update to the latest version, By the way, Pete, I am having this the problem with different email clientes: Thunderbird, Outlook and Kmail I'll let you know how it goes. Thanks again Esther On 28/04/11 15:33, Francisco Wagner C. Freire wrote: > I think a good try is update the new server to latest dovecot version. > I migrate about 1.5M

Hello! There is a problem with samba (tested: 2.0.5 6 and pre7) tested on Linux RH 5.2 RH6.0 and FreeBSD 3.3 and 3.4 (all the same result!) The problem is a group of programs written in Clarion ( still in active development, and working on different 1000000+ PC in many network/single configurations). This is some kind of financial/management software for small bussines. Databases are about 500K