similar to: Testing new email settings to fix DKIM

Please ignore this test message. Validating whether the mailing list is still breaking DKIM signed messages.

Please ignore this test message

Please ignore this mail too.

Testing

I created a client library to send emails for a webapp. After connecting to the SMTP server with credential setup in CPANEL, and then do NOT add Message-Id header, the DKIM signature 'h' record created by dovecot/WHM is wrong, and a Message-ID (with a capital D) header is added, invalidating the generated DKIM signature value. This causes outlook, yahoo, gmail and other email

On 12-10-2020 10:16, Robert Martin wrote: > > I created a client library to send emails for a webapp. > > After connecting to the SMTP server with credential setup in CPANEL, > and then do NOT add Message-Id header, the DKIM signature 'h' record > created by dovecot/WHM is wrong, and a Message-ID (with a capital D) > header is added, invalidating the generated DKIM

I created a client library to send emails for a webapp. When the client library makes a connection to the SMTP server, and then do NOT add Message-Id header, Message-ID (with a capital D) header is added, and the SMTP server adds a incorrect DKIM-Signature record 'h' part, invalidating the generated DKIM signature value. This causes outlook, yahoo, gmail and other email recipients

Hi List Subscribers, In recent months we have been seeing an increasing number of bounced deliveries from libvirt mailing lists[1] due to DMARC policies on list subscriber's mail servers. IOW, many subscribers are only receiving a subset of mails sent to the libvirt mailing lists. We believe the root cause of many of the problems is that mailman is modifying the mail subject to add the

Hi Dear Community Friends, it is few days now, i am trying to figure out why DKIM is working / not working. Any assistance would be very much appreciable. Server IP is not blacklisted ever, MX, PTR SPF, DKIM records are available in DNS. why it is working at Gmail, why failing at Yahoo? Gmail dkim=pass header.i=@digital-infotech.net Yahoo: domainkeys=neutral (no sig);

Okay, Yahoo is bumming me. Only system my mail is having an issue with. All mail is accepted, but junked. I can only think it is the DKIM/Domain keys. It is apparent that the dkim-milter is not part of the centos 5.x distro nor is it part of the mirrors, as far as I can tell. So...have any of you done it with your servers for sendmail? There are some sites that claim to have rpms and I have

Dear Friends, is anyone is able to setup DKIM with FreeBSD 9.0 and Postfix? thanks / Prabhpal

just testing, if it tempfails on dovecot mail me private from the admins of dovecot maillist only

Hi, amavisd is adding the following header to my mails : Authentication-Results: my.example.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: DNS query timeout for their._domainkey.example.com)" header.d=example.com The problem is that this is not quite true ! I have no DNS problems, e.g. if I do : dig their._domainkey.example.com TXT dig returns fine without any

If I don't get swamp of errors with this email, I'll stop the From munging starting tomorrow. There is now ARC signing done for mails. Lets see how this works, if we can stop rewriting from I'll be happy. Aki

A while back I struggled to get Domainkeys and DKIM to work properly on my little home server. While I'm sure they weren't necessary in a strict sense, it not only enabled me to learn about the technology but allowed for more of a verification of the email coming from my server. And so this week I figured: "Hey, this has been working without a problem for a while; it must be time to

On Wed, 2018-03-28 at 19:28 +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > *every* single message from this mailing list has a reply-to header to > the poster, independent who is the poster, no other mailing-list on > planet earth has a reply-to-header - it's that simple - period So, e-mail is hard these days, and mailing list e-mail is even harder. Read up about the interactions between

On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 06:51:50 +1300 Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2018-03-28 at 19:28 +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > > *every* single message from this mailing list has a reply-to header > > to the poster, independent who is the poster, no other mailing-list > > on planet earth has a reply-to-header - it's that simple

> On 11/12/2019 21:58 Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > If I don't get swamp of errors with this email, I'll stop the From munging starting tomorrow. There is now ARC signing done for mails. Lets see how this works, if we can stop rewriting from I'll be happy. > > Aki And last attempt, since mailman didn't actually bother to

Hello, Does anyone have a sample SELinux policy for dkim-milter? I'm using the configuration from this page: http://www.howtoforge.com/set-up-dkim-for-multiple-domains-on-postfix-with-dkim-milter-2.8.x-centos-5.3 Along with the latest RPM from the link on that page. Regards, Ben -- Ben McGinnes http://www.adversary.org/ Twitter: benmcginnes Systems Administrator, Writer, ICT

What''s the directors'' take on ading DKIM or SPF functionality into ActionMailer. Is that a function that is better addressed via a plugin, or would an extension or a monkeypatch of this class be an appropriate avenue of pursuit? Steven --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on