similar to: IRC question: How to install a kernel module using virt-customize

On 21 Jun 2015 04:46, "Robert G. (Doc) Savage" <dsavage at peaknet.net> wrote: > > What should have been a routine upgrade to ZFS 0.6.4.1-1.el6.x86_64 > somehow failed, and now I've lost access to a 2T raidz2 array. I've > tried removing all zfs and related packages (spl*), then starting fresh. > For reasons that have have nothing to do with this problem (I

What should have been a routine upgrade to ZFS 0.6.4.1-1.el6.x86_64 somehow failed, and now I've lost access to a 2T raidz2 array. I've tried removing all zfs and related packages (spl*), then starting fresh. For reasons that have have nothing to do with this problem (I don't think), I'm still booted to kernel 2.6.32-431.29.2.el6.x86_64, and there are no other kernels installed.

There are options that can help a little bit with the ls/find. Still, many devs will need to know your settings, so the volume's info is very important. Try the 'noatime,nodiratime' (if ZFS supports them). Also, as this is a new cluster you can try to setup XFS and verify if the issue is the same. RedHat provide an XFS options' calculator but it requires aby kind of subscription

Sorry if this has been dealt with, but I couldn't find it in a search. I updated Fedora to the new kernel build, and there are no current drivers for nvidia cards for that. That's fine, livna made a new neat thing called akmod-nvidia that appears to have built the drivers very nicely (quite pleased with that). All is happy and shiny from within Linux (compiz works and openGL games work

Hi all! Running Centos-6.latest on an AMD six-core Vishera processor. It's been running for a year on that hardware. today I swapped out the video card (from Nvidia 9800GT to Nvidia 460 GTX) hoping to get a little more horsepower, and the ability to run the Folding At Home GPUclient. I know that's an old card, it's a hand-me-down from my son who just replaced it with a new 970 GTX

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.93-0.10 Severity: serious User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, blktap-dkms fails to build a module for Linux 4.12: Selecting previously unselected package blktap-dkms. (Reading database ... 34976 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../blktap-dkms_2.0.93-0.10_amd64.deb ... Unpacking blktap-dkms (2.0.93-0.10) ...

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.93-0.3 Severity: serious Tags: sid stretch User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to build a kernel module for the current sid kernel: Setting up blktap-dkms (2.0.93-0.3) ... Loading new blktap-2.0.93 DKMS files... First Installation: checking all kernels... dpkg: warning: version

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.91-1 Severity: normal With both linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 and linux-image-3.16-2-amd64 installed, blktap fails to compile for the 3.16-2 kernel, but succeeds for the 3.2.0-4 kernel. (Contrary to the dependency listing below, I do have the headers for 3.16-2 installed.) I am attaching the build log. -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.6 APT prefers

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.93-0.3 Severity: normal With both linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 and linux-image-3.16-2-amd64 installed, blktap fails to compile for the 3.2.0-4 kernel, but succeeds for the 3.16-2 kernel. (Headers for both kernel versions are installed.) I am attaching the build log. Note that bug 764132 is for blktap-dkms version 2.0.91-1 and fails for the opposite kernel

Package: blktap-dkms Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, blktap-dkms FTBFS against linux 3.10-1 from unstable: Cheers, Moritz CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.91/build/control.o In file included from /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.91/build/control.c:30:0: /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.91/build/blktap.h:75:41: warning: variably modified ?pending? at file scope [enabled by

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > user debian-qa at lists.debian.org Setting user to debian-qa at lists.debian.org (was anbe at debian.org). > tags 714794 - moreinfo Bug #714794 {Done: Gilles Filippini <pini at debian.org>} [release.debian.org] pu: package sikuli/1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-5+deb7u1 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > tags 710035 - moreinfo Bug #710035

Hi, Unfortunately, I did not succeed to compile a btrfs module via dkms from btrfs-unstable (commit 9aeead73782c4b8e2a91def36dbf95db28605c95) for kernel version 2.6.34-git16. For the exact error message, please see the make.log attached. If I replace the symlink to btrfs-unstable/fs/btrfs by a sumlink to the corresponding subdirectory of the kernel tree everything works well. Thanks, Andreas

Googling this (specifically the nvidia-bug-report line below) doesn't find anything. This is a server (console is text only, no GUI), so we may not need x11 nor nvidia, I dunno for sure. Thanks in advance for your thoughts. kind regards/ldv Transaction Check Error: file /usr/bin/nvidia-bug-report.sh from install of dkms-nvidia-x11-drv-185.18.14-1.nodist.rf conflicts with file from

Hi all, I''d like to look into btrfs code and try some things, so I followed the instructions on the wiki (link below) to setup git and get a dkms build against my kernel. I''m using Ubuntu 10.10 with a 2.6.35 Kernel, which I assume is too old. What version do I need? https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Btrfs_source_repositories I''ve followed the guide (skipped

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.91-1 Severity: important User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8): http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails Filing this as important as having a piuparts clean

Hi, I am very new to R and I've been trying to work through the R book to gain a better idea of the code (which is also completely new to me). Initially I imputed my data from a text file and that seemed to work ok, but I'm trying to examine linear relationships between gdist and gair, gdist and gsub, m6dist and m6air, etc. This didn't work and I think it might have something to do

Package: xcp-xapi Version: 1.3.2-6 Severity: important Looks like on Wheezy, /etc/default/xen is not created by xen-utils-common. Since xcp-xapi depends on its existence and further declaration of the toolstack in it, it should take extra care to ensure that it is present. root at debian:~# aptitude install xcp-xapi The following NEW packages will be installed: blktap-dkms{a} blktap-utils{a}

Il 25-06-2018 23:59 Yves Bellefeuille ha scritto: > I think the simplest solution would be to add this (which I haven't > tried): > > http://zfsonlinux.org/ > https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/wiki/RHEL-and-CentOS > > to the Available Repositories for CentOS wiki page: > > https://wiki.centos.org/fr/AdditionalResources/Repositories/ > > unless someone with

Alan, I knew of the Dell article, as I have all of those saved for reference. [1] I was just wondering if you knew of any that were for someone knew to Linux. You know the Microsoft type tutorials that have screenshot with them. That's the question I get asked a lot of times from around my home area. In turn when these users that are new to Linux they get discouraged when they can't

On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 23:32 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Hi, > > Phil Schaffner wrote: > > Karanbir provided driver disk images and indicated that kmod drivers > > would be in CentOS-5 Extras, but apparently these never materialized. > > The only src.rpm I could turn up was the last link above, and I did get > > CentOS-5 x86_64 kmod-style drivers to build from