similar to: Intel EXPI9014PTBLK + CentOS 5.

Well, I have written that onboard network controller doesn't work... It's not true anymore. A small howto: 1) add pci network card 2) install with "linux all-generic-ide pci=nommconf" 3) update to the latest distro kernel 2.6.9-42.0.3 4) get http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/e1000/e1000-7.3.20.tar.gz 5) do have kernel-headers, rpmbuild ... etc. 6) rpmbuild -ta

Well, I have written that onboard network controller doesn't work... It's not true anymore. A small howto: 1) add pci network card 2) install with "linux all-generic-ide pci=nommconf" 3) update to the latest distro kernel 2.6.9-42.0.3 4) get http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/e1000/e1000-7.3.20.tar.gz 5) do have kernel-headers, rpmbuild ... etc. 6) rpmbuild -ta

Has anyone stumbled across an Intel brand motherboard which both works with the 8000 series of CPUs and with CentOS 4/5 out of the box? (by works I mean the NIC/Disk controllers without "fudgery") The DG31 board "kind of" works but unfortunately it has 2 DIMM slots, the realtek NIC isn't supported (don't know why, its just a standard realtek NIC, although it might be

Hello, We have built a couple of CentOS 5.5 systems on the Intel DH67BL (Sandy Bridge) motherboard and overall they work pretty well. I'm having one problem which keeps cropping up and that is an error message that says: IRQ 177 nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option) report bad irq, references CPU idle then it references usb_hcd_irq and e1000_intr then it disables the add-on

Hi there, has anyone run into any Desktop/Workstation Intel brand motherboards that work with CentOS 5.1 (4.6/3.9 out of box compatibility is a very large plus) and work with the 1333MHZ cpus such as the 8400/9450 and accept 8GB of RAM? The closest we've found so far is the DG31PR which is alright but it has the limitation of 4GB of RAM and an unsupported Realtek NIC. The DQ35JO is also ok,

Howdy, We've noticed that the new chipsets required for the **50 series of intel processors is not supported in CentOS 5. We've tried the DG31 board which (realtek nic unsupported) DG33 no support for disk controller or NICs. We also tried the dx38bt and there was no support. Fedora 8 apparently works great with all of the boards we tried. My question is, will there these boards not be

Motherboard - Intel DG41TY Device: RealTek: 8111D Driver: RTL8169 Causes Kernel panic during install and boot. -- It seems that the newer the card that uses this driver, the worse the problems are. Is there any plan to roll a newer version into the installer or the actual distribution itself? Thanks, -Drew -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Is anyone aware of any Dual or Quad port Intel NICs which work out of the box in CentOS 5.2? we need bonding to work. Thanks, -Drew -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080820/f31976c7/attachment-0005.html>

Does anyone know of a card that actually works with CentOS 4 that supports Raid10? I don't think CentOS support software raid 10 from the installer. Thanks, -Drew -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050812/ab215629/attachment-0002.html>

-----Original Message----- From: "centos-request at centos.org" <centos-request at centos.org> To: "centos at centos.org" <centos at centos.org> Sent: 12/30/06 12:01 PM Subject: CentOS Digest, Vol 23, Issue 30 Send CentOS mailing list submissions to centos at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

Does anyone know if upstream ever plans on updating the dovecot package to a non RC version or to even one of the RC versions that isn't so insecure, And by insecure, I of course refer to the recent rash of bugs which have been found. Thanks, -Drew -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

> Sorry - I once was sold on the idea of djb's tools and Qmail, and I've > regretted installing it ever since. Save yourself some serious agony - run > (don't walk!) away from djb-ANYTHING! I don't know what problems you had with it, but I'm hapilly using it on about 20 servers (both djbdns and qmail) and never had a problem with it. I'll remember your advice

does anyone know if (and where) a feature list of the changes between CentOS 5.2 and 5.3 can be found? All of the documentation that I could find on centos.org is related to 5.2 and 5.1 thanks, -Drew -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090416/4676bbb4/attachment-0002.html>

Hi there I am just writing to find out if anyone else had an issue installing CentOS 5 on an inspiron notebook. If I choose Desktop - Gnome in the distribution selection, after the "transferring image to hard disk" message it waits a very long time than dies with an error about not being able to run the transaction due to the following error: Press enter to reboot. I am able

Oh, alright my specific issue is just about creating the actual pxe image.. not what happens after -----Original Message----- From: CentOS <centos-bounces at centos.org> On Behalf Of R C Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2019 12:18 PM To: centos at centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] livemedia-creator --make-pxe-live CentOS 7 I have "issues" with later versions of Centos/RHEL 7 also.

I have "issues" with later versions of Centos/RHEL 7 also. PXE boot seems to work, but after the new kernel kexec's, it seems to drop the NICS and further in the process for some reason, the nics never come up, which leads to all kindsof issues of course (trying to boot a cluster that way). I also have the impression that it is a dracut issue, however, I have not pinpointed it

Hi All, This is my first post ... I *HAD* been trying to get RHEL AS 4 onto this Dell PE 6400/700, but it just wouldn't go without some weird tweaking. I am VERY happy to say that CentOS 4.4 installed without a hitch! NICELY done folks! The only real issue for me is that the machine fails to reboot or shutdown correctly. It requires physical interaction with the power switch,

On 08/01/15 02:32 PM, david wrote: > Folks > > The price point of Intel's NUC unit makes it attractive to use as a > server that doesn't have significant computational load. In my > environment, a USB connected hard-drive could provide all the storage > needed. I wonder if anyone has had experience with it, and can answer: > > 1) Does Centos6 and/or Centos7

Anyone know if you'll be able to simply upgrade from the beta of centos5 to the stable release? thanks, -Drew -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070117/c32cc0b8/attachment.html>

Morning Everyone, I'm busy doing a rebuild of my home server and am tossing between VMware and KVM for this build. I already have experience with ESX, we use it at work, but I'm debating trying out KVM for a while. The server itself is a budget build using a Supermicro X8SAX board w/ i7-950 & 12GB RAM, LSI 3081 SAS RAID (1068e based), rolled into a NorcoTek 16 Bay SAS case. Not fancy