Anyone know if you'll be able to simply upgrade from the beta of centos5 to the stable release? thanks, -Drew -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070117/c32cc0b8/attachment.html>
On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 10:14 -0500, Drew Weaver wrote:> Anyone know if you'll be able to simply upgrade from the beta of > centos5 to the stable release?How could we possibly know that now :P RHEL5 is not even created yet (nor is CentOS-5 beta {completely} or CentOS-5) ... ---------------------- It is one of our goals to make it be ... if possible ... upgradable. If the upstream guys roll a package in beta back to an older version in stable (it happens all the time) ... then it won't be AUTOMATICALLY upgradeable, as you would need to manually handle that {as one example}. Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070117/416d479e/attachment.sig>
Has there been any movement in the idea of adding support for the current intel processors/chipsets to centos4? -Drew -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Johnny Hughes Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 10:27 AM To: CentOS ML Subject: Re: [CentOS] Easy upgrade path from beta5 to stable 5? On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 10:14 -0500, Drew Weaver wrote:> Anyone know if you'll be able to simply upgrade from the beta of > centos5 to the stable release?How could we possibly know that now :P RHEL5 is not even created yet (nor is CentOS-5 beta {completely} or CentOS-5) ... ---------------------- It is one of our goals to make it be ... if possible ... upgradable. If the upstream guys roll a package in beta back to an older version in stable (it happens all the time) ... then it won't be AUTOMATICALLY upgradeable, as you would need to manually handle that {as one example}. Thanks, Johnny Hughes