similar to: newhidups USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed: ret -110 messages

Dear List, I thought it might be useful if I wrote up my notes on getting an MGE UPS to work with NUT and openSUSE. The MGE UPS (an Ellipse 1500 USB) will work well with NUT and openSUSE 10.2, but not "out-of-the-box": there are some things you need to do: Intro. MGE have built rpms of NUT which greatly simplify installation. Merci MGE. I used the rpm's for nut-2.0.5 and the

Hello, I'm using NUT to manage a MGE Ellipse ASR UPS, with the newhidups driver. It works fine, except that after a few hours, I get a few errors from the kernel and the driver dies. Here's the output from the syslog: Apr 26 02:00:41 ezquiel kernel: usb 1-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd newhidups rqt 128 rq 6 len 255 ret -110 Apr 26 02:00:43 ezquiel last message repeated 2 times

OPENSOURCE wrote: > > I hope this answer your questions, and I hope you're ready to wait a bit > more. > Sure, NP for me, thanks for the feedback Arnaud. I have to admit that past days im having the syslog with a lil more activity from the new usb attached unit (ellipse ASR 1000 VA) Network UPS Tools: New USB/HID UPS driver 0.23 (2.0.2-pre2) Detected an UPS: MGE UPS

Hello, I have a Salicru UPS in a Debian Wheezy connected with a USB HUB: # lsusb Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub ... Bus 001 Device 003: ID 1a40:0201 Terminus Technology Inc. FE 2.1 7-port Hub Bus 001 Device 005: ID 0665:5161 Cypress Semiconductor USB to Serial The problem is that I have some failed messages: # dmesg ... [90941.136274] usb 1-3.7: usbfs:

I'm trying to get nut to work with a Cyberpower 900AVR. There are many different products known by this name, but this one has the extra name 'BC900D'. I am told by a cyberpower tech that this one should talk exactly the same USB protocol as the 685AVR, which was recently made to work with newhidups. Unfortunately, when I run the SVN checkout (trunk) of nut-2.1, I get: sstreet

2014-03-08 14:26 GMT+01:00 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>: > On Mar 7, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Josu Lazkano <josu.lazkano at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Are the messages a problem? Or could I ignore? > > Since they aren't happening on each poll interval, they are not a big problem. The driver should recognize -110 as a timeout, and retry the query. Thanks for the

Hi all, after a change of UPS (to Atlantis Host Power 851) I began to use the new driver blazer_usb and compared to old one (blazer used with serial connection) I noted more CPU use and errors in dmesg: [...] [256712.584370] usb 4-5: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd blazer_usb rqt 33 rq 9 len 8 ret -110 [256789.640795] usb 4-5: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd blazer_usb rqt 33 rq 9 len 8

I have nut 2.6.4-2.3+deb7u1 on debian 7 32bit, with UPS Eaton Nova AVR 1250 connected via USB. It happens several times a day that I get a message about Apr 3 16:41:49 kernel: [422581.049671] usb 5-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 4 ret -110 Apr 3 16:41:54 kernel: [422586.041057] usb 5-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 3 ret

Hi, I keep getting the following messages (or similar) in my syslog: Nov 23 11:38:08 io kernel: [763936.921566] usb 3-2: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 5 ret -110 Nov 23 11:38:08 io kernel: [763936.972569] usb 3-2: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 5 ret -75 Nov 23 11:38:08 io kernel: [763936.976568] usb 3-2: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL

Hello list, I have a "Salicru SPS One 700VA" in a Debian Wheezy server. I configured a week ago, it works well, but today it start to show "UPS salicru at 192.168.x.x:3493 is unavailable" And I got this in the system logs: # dmesg [147080.501925] usb 4-5: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd blazer_usb rqt 128 rq 6 len 255 ret -62 [147080.503913] usb 4-5: usbfs:

Hello, I encountered a problem with my APC Smart-UPS 750, connected via USB, using newhidups. Without any reason, nut/upsmon shut down my PC: >>> Oct 13 12:57:08 echo kernel: usb 2-9.1.1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd newhidups rqt 161 rq 1 len 8 ret -71 Oct 13 12:57:12 echo upsmon[5060]: UPS smart750@localhost on battery Oct 13 12:57:12 echo upsmon[5060]: UPS smart750@localhost

On Apr 3, 2014, at 3:40 PM, Adam Pribyl wrote: > I have nut 2.6.4-2.3+deb7u1 on debian 7 32bit, with UPS Eaton Nova AVR 1250 connected via USB. Which kernel version? > It happens several times a day that I get a message about > > Apr 3 16:41:49 kernel: [422581.049671] usb 5-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 4 ret -110 > Apr 3 16:41:54 kernel:

I recently purchased a CyberPower CP1200AVR UPS and am trying to get NUT 2.0.3 or NUT 2.1.0 to work with the newhidups driver, but am having little success. Before I purchased I did some googling and saw people talking about problems so I'm guessing it may not be supported yet? I did find some posts about people getting it to (sort of) work with some hacks, but couldn't tell if they

I have a ups that doesn't always (sometimes it does) load NUT right. I use Gentoo: * sys-power/nut Latest version available: 2.6.0-r1 Latest version installed: 2.6.0-r1 Size of files: 1,663 kB Homepage: http://www.networkupstools.org/ Description: Network-UPS Tools License: GPL-2 The kernel is 3.0.4. Here is the dmesg output:

On Nov 25, 2013, at 4:56 PM, Fabio Cecamore wrote: > Hi all, > after a change of UPS (to Atlantis Host Power 851) I began to use the new driver blazer_usb and compared to old one (blazer used with serial connection) I noted more CPU use and errors in dmesg: > > [...] > [256712.584370] usb 4-5: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd blazer_usb rqt 33 rq 9 len 8 ret -110 "ret

Hi, There is many (20 per day on average) messages like: kernel: usb 2-2: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd usbhid-ups rqt 161 rq 1 len 2 ret -110 usbhid-ups[6768]: HIDGetDataValue: Connection timed out What can be done do correct that problem? best regards, Franck my configuration: debian etch nut 2.2.1 (recompiled source from testing to use latest version before posting here) updated

please subscribe to the nut user mailing list ( http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser) and post the output of "/path/to/usbhid-ups -DDDDD -a <your_ups_name_in_ups.conf>" cheers, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://www.eaton.com/mgeops Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer -

hi all Using a vanilla 2.4.23, I try to setup the USB FXS interface to add an old gray 1960 rotary dial phone for a demo. But it doesn't work :( Can someone decipher the below messages and help me out here? Please ask if more info is needed roy usb.c: kusbd: /sbin/hotplug add 4 usb.c: kusbd: /sbin/hotplug add 4 usb.c: kusbd: /sbin/hotplug add 4 usb.c: kusbd: /sbin/hotplug add 4 hub.c:

Hi, I'm running nut 2.0.3 on Gentoo connected to an MGE ProtectionCenter 675. newhidups intermittently crashes. Any ideas? N. # /usr/lib/nut/newhidups -a mgeups Network UPS Tools: New USB/HID UPS driver 0.28 (2.0.3) Detected a UPS: MGE UPS SYSTEMS/PROTECTIONCENTER Using subdriver: MGE HID 0.8 This is the error I'm getting *** glibc detected *** /usr/lib/nut/newhidups: double free or

I have restored original configuration and enabled the ignorelb flag. I didn't point out in the original e-mail that after every poweroff the battery percentage is reported at 40% instead of 100% and charges slowly again to 100%. Maybe the UPS sends a LB event and shuts down immediatly as suggested in the manual. But the UPS powered off again. The variables reported by upsc can be found