similar to: [LLVMdev] simply wonder pronunciation of Clang

On Jul 3, 2008, at 8:06 AM, Seung Jae Lee wrote: > Hello, LLVMers. > > I just wonder How I can pronounce Clang. > > [see-laeng], [see-lang], [k-laeng], [k-lang]?? We've been pronouncing it kl -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: abreve.gif Type: image/gif Size: 62 bytes Desc: not available URL:

On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Seung Jae Lee wrote: > I just wonder How I can pronounce Clang. > > [see-laeng], [see-lang], [k-laeng], [k-lang]?? I pronounce it just like the english word, which is probably one of your later two options :) -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

Anyone know how centos is actually pronounced? When people I work with ask me which linux I run, I say it like the word scent - oh - s, with a sharp S on the end. How's everyone else say it? How's it supposed to be said?

Timo, What is the "official" way to pronounce Dovecot? Is there a meaning to the word? A background on why you chose it? -- Jesse Peterson erage at softhome.net

Greets, Every linux user that sets up a sound card using sndconfig heres Linus pronouncing "Linux" - I confess that's how I learned to pronounce it right, until then I prononced it 'l-EYE-nucks' - I was wondering - what's the correct pronounciation of 'Ogg Vorbis'? I pronounce it 'OOOg' (a long 'O' sound or a portuguese 'U' if you must

From: Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com> > MUCH more FOSS oriented I've been taking an informal survey on this for awhile now. I know the new, official acronym is Free and Open Source Software (FOSS). But even before that acronym was popular, I had long argued that Stallman's insistence on calling it "Free Software" when that could be confused with

> Ubuntu and Knoppix can say they use Debian sources ... SLAX can say it > uses Slackware sources. Those guys have trademarks too. Debian and Slackware don't sell "enterprise" products. And many such projects are non-profit or otherwise. Unless Debian plans to establish itself as a commercial player, they don't need to defend their trademark. In fact, the commercial

On Fri, April 17, 2015 12:50 am, Peter Lawler wrote: > On 17/04/15 12:31, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> But being not native >> English speaker, I use it ("not native English speaker") > Figured as much, which is why I mentioned it ;) > >> as an excuse for >> being unable to pronounce anything. > Not as if most English speakers can pronounce many English

From: Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com> > IBM has since totally changed their thoughts with regards to GNU/Linux. Actually, their cut-off of Monterey had everything to do with their current change in strategy on Linux back in 2000+. Monterey was established before IBM's interest in GNU/Linux. After IBM realized that it could use an economical complement in Linux, it saw

From: Collins Richey > Sounds pretty religious-based to me. > IBM=bad > HP,Sun, RedHat, SCO=good. > OTOH, from some of your comments, Novell=better. Are you really that shallow? IBM is our partner, not our friend. Sun has its interests too, and has 5 different entities of focus, which vary. Red Hat is a tale of two companies, cut-throat business combined with GPL-analness (like

From: Martyn Drake <martyn at drake.org.uk> > To be quite honest with you - that's been and gone so quickly I can't > ever remember what my position was at that time. It actually happened over the span of 2 years before any name change. With the introduction of RHEL as a separate product, RHL was having an identity crisis. It used to be that ".2" was the

From: Dag Wieers > Sorry to interrupt but he was describing how you appeared in previous > postings. And I have to say that I felt the same way reading some of your postings. Really? Then I'll re-read them since there's been a second confirmation. Just know that I wasn't trying to make it about good/bad. I'm just trying to make the point that companies aren't just

Hello. My name is Seung Jae Lee. I'd like to ask you onething about converting to ARM assembly code. I saved the simplest C code shown in your LLVM webpage as 'hello.c' And I made 'hello.bc' by "$ llvm-gcc hello.c -o hello". In order to make ARM assembly code, I typed "llc -march=arm hello.bc -o hello.arm" But, I met this error. llc: ARMISelDAGToDAG.cpp:73:

From: Martyn Drake <martyn at drake.org.uk> > When I did try that support, it didn't give me a favourable > impression. However, that's just my opinion. It's good enough that HP is losing lots of clients because HP (among other tier-1 OEMs short of IBM) is finding that Linux their support is sub-par. Even Dell and others are just farming support out to Red Hat. >

From: Feizhou <feizhou at graffiti.net> > I still remember the FIRST Linux GUI installer for a Linux distro. It > came on the Caldera Openlinux 2.2. It worked. It was really nice. Actually, the first distro with a GUI installer was Yggdrasil, circa 1993. It installed on 8MB of RAM using X and Athena/FVWM. > The Novell guys that were behind Caldera deserve plenty of respect for

On 08/26/2010 11:53, Eric Christopher wrote: > It basically means that a pseudo wasn't lowered to something that the jit can output before the jit was run. Is this on ToT? > I don't know what is ToT. 42 meanings listed here http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/TOT don't seem to apply. Yuri

Hello. Nice to meet you. My name is Seung Jae Lee, a graduate student in UIUC CEE, who is working in NCSA for the present. Nowadays I am trying to develop LLVM backend to spit out CHiMPS assembly code. In the process, I installed LLVM codes on my home directory in the host computer. But I don't think it was installed properly. While bootstrapping the LLVM C/C++ Front-End, I met several

Hello. I am trying to run tblgen so I typed $ tblgen ARM.td -print-enums -class=Register in "llvm/lib/Target/ARM" But I got an error as follows: Included from ARM.td:18: Parsing ../Target.td:16: Could not find include file 'llvm/Intrinsics.td'! As you know, the 16th line of Target.td includes "llvm/Intrinsics.td". But this cannot find Intrinsics.td, I think. Of

Thank you, Bill. Seems to be better. Anyway...Is there a way I can do what you showed for me? Thanks, Seung J. Lee ---- Original message ---- >Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 22:10:01 -0800 >From: Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Question to Chris >To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > >On Jan 26, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Seung

Thanks for your comment. I also tried for LLVM 2.2 but got the same compilation errors on VS2005. (I didn't modify anything before the compilation) I just wonder if I need bison and flex even just in the case of compiling them on VS2005 without changing anything because the LLVM doc says "If you plan to modify any .y or .l files, you will need to have bison and/or flex installed where