similar to: DKMS

I got the DKMS-system working and now have the Nvidia-drivers v173.08 installed (using rpmforge as suggested previously). Unfortunately this particular driver version gives me screen artifacts so as to make the screen more or less unreadable. Nvidia's proprietary drivers are now up to v180.44 and this version is fine with my test system. I really like the DKMS-system, as it enables me

I've just built the nvidia driver for my home machine for the third time and I'd like to put it into a dkms format, but I'm not entirely clear on what goes where to make this work. I googled for a good primer on dkms, but what I'm finding is essentially equivalent to the man page, which, like most Unix/Linux man pages, doesn't really tell you "how to do this from

Am 05.09.2017 um 06:16 schrieb Eugene Poole: > I tried to move to the latest stable kernel (4.12) so I could take "latest stable kernel (4.12) - that's not a CentOS project kernel. Can we guess that you are using the ELrepo kernel-ml? > advantage of my newest custom system (Intel Core I7 6-core; 64 GB RAM; > MSI nVidia graphics card; 2 - 120 GB SSD; 2 - 4TB WD Black) on a

Package: blktap-dkms Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, blktap-dkms FTBFS against linux 3.10-1 from unstable: Cheers, Moritz CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.91/build/control.o In file included from /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.91/build/control.c:30:0: /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.91/build/blktap.h:75:41: warning: variably modified ?pending? at file scope [enabled by

Hi, Unfortunately, I did not succeed to compile a btrfs module via dkms from btrfs-unstable (commit 9aeead73782c4b8e2a91def36dbf95db28605c95) for kernel version 2.6.34-git16. For the exact error message, please see the make.log attached. If I replace the symlink to btrfs-unstable/fs/btrfs by a sumlink to the corresponding subdirectory of the kernel tree everything works well. Thanks, Andreas

Hi all, I''d like to look into btrfs code and try some things, so I followed the instructions on the wiki (link below) to setup git and get a dkms build against my kernel. I''m using Ubuntu 10.10 with a 2.6.35 Kernel, which I assume is too old. What version do I need? https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Btrfs_source_repositories I''ve followed the guide (skipped

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.91-1 Severity: important User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8): http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails Filing this as important as having a piuparts clean

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.93-0.3 Severity: serious Tags: sid stretch User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to build a kernel module for the current sid kernel: Setting up blktap-dkms (2.0.93-0.3) ... Loading new blktap-2.0.93 DKMS files... First Installation: checking all kernels... dpkg: warning: version

Hi everyone. I was trying to test a more recent version of btrfs on my current kernel (2.6.37) using dkms, without success. I followed these instructions: https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Btrfs_source_repositories - cloned the repo - symlinked to /usr/src/btrfs-git - patched version.sh: Please note version.sh requires bash (better to change the shebang or fix the script). Even with the

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.93-0.1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) blktap fails to build on kernel 3.13 and probably older kernels as well. According to this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blktap-dkms/+bug/1245009 VM_RESERVED is deprecated as of 3.7. Building with the patch described in that bug allows for

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian Xen Team <pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org> * Package name : blktap-dkms Version : 2.0.90 Upstream Author : Jon Ludlam <jonathan.ludlam at eu.citrix.com> * URL : http://www.xen.org/ * License : GPL-2 Programming Lang: C Description : Xen blktap kernel component DKMS package This package

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.93-0.2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) The build fails on 3.14 kernel with the following error: /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/ring.c: In function ?blktap_ring_make_tr_request?: /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/ring.c:314:32: error: ?struct bio? has no member named ?bi_sector?

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.93-0.10 Severity: serious User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, blktap-dkms fails to build a module for Linux 4.12: Selecting previously unselected package blktap-dkms. (Reading database ... 34976 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../blktap-dkms_2.0.93-0.10_amd64.deb ... Unpacking blktap-dkms (2.0.93-0.10) ...

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.91-1 Severity: normal After an update of the kernel in SID, I have noticed that blktap-dkms didn't automatically rebuild itself when I upgraded my server with a newer kernel version. My understanding is that it should have. Also, doing dpkg-reconfigure blktap-dkms or reinstalling the package did make it rebuild the kernel module. Thomas Goirand (zigo) --

My OQO boxes have the AR5413 wifi chipset, so for the first time in quite a while, I again need to run madwifi. So I went looking for the dkms madwifi rpms, but could not find them. They use to be on rpmforge, as I recall. dkms is there. So have I lost some memory cells or have these rpms taken a hike?

tags 742515 + patch tags 742515 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for blktap-dkms (versioned as 2.0.93-0.2) and uploaded it directly to the archive as discussed on IRC. Regards. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: blktap-dkms-2.0.93-0.2-nmu.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 2499 bytes Desc: not available URL:

First, I want to thank Karanbir for the centos extras repo. I have a question about dkms. I have several Dell PowerEdge systems with Centos 4, and kbs-CentOS- Extras and dell-software repos enabled. Is there any possible conflict if I allow yum to update dkms from dell-software instead of kbs-CentOS-Extras? Currently the i386 architecture has version 2.0.11- in dell-software and 2.0.10-1

Hi - I'm trying to get wireless running on CentOS 4.7 on a dual core laptop (latitude-e4500) for an employee. I'm having trouble with building dkms-ndiswraper-1.54-1.el4.rf - enclosed are the errors messages. The kernel was rebuilt to disable CONFIG_4KSTACKS. The errors prior to rebuilding the kernel are identical to the errors after rebuilding the kernel and rebooting - minus the error

blktap-dkms 2.0.93-0.1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2014-05-07 It is affected by these RC bugs: 742515: blktap-dkms: blktapblktap kernel module failed to build

blktap-dkms 2.0.93-0.1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2014-05-28 It is affected by these RC bugs: 742515: blktap-dkms: blktapblktap kernel module failed to build