First, I want to thank Karanbir for the centos extras repo. I have a question about dkms. I have several Dell PowerEdge systems with Centos 4, and kbs-CentOS- Extras and dell-software repos enabled. Is there any possible conflict if I allow yum to update dkms from dell-software instead of kbs-CentOS-Extras? Currently the i386 architecture has version 2.0.11- in dell-software and 2.0.10-1 in kbs-CentOS-Extras. Cheers, Tony Schreiner Boston College
Tony Schreiner wrote:> First, I want to thank Karanbir for the centos extras repo. > I have a question about dkms.you are welcome!> I have several Dell PowerEdge systems with Centos 4, and > kbs-CentOS-Extras and dell-software repos enabled. Is there any possible > conflict if I allow yum to update dkms from dell-software instead of > kbs-CentOS-Extras? Currently the i386 architecture has version 2.0.11- > in dell-software and 2.0.10-1 in kbs-CentOS-Extras.There should be no problem, if you do have a problem let me know and I will fix it asap. - KB
Apparently Analagous Threads
- Bug#694429: blktap-dkms: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8): /lib/modules/$KVERS/kernel/
- Bug#748953: blktap-dkms: Struct bio was changed in 3.14 breaking build
- Building btrfs as a dkms module on Debian
- Bug#648691: ITP: blktap-dkms -- Xen blktap kernel component DKMS package
- Bug#742515: blktap-dkms: blktapblktap kernel module failed to build