similar to: Re: BUG: Mailing list strips PGP signatures

Paul Johnson wrote: > On Thursday 13 March 2008 01:27:23 pm Paul Johnson wrote: > > > -------------- next part -------------- > > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > > Name: not available > > Type: application/pgp-signature > > Size: 189 bytes > > Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. > > Url : > >

Paul Johnson wrote: > On Thursday 13 March 2008 03:53:14 pm vitamin wrote: > > > > Yes it's a bug. Only not that they are being stripped. But that you sending > > them to the mailing list in the first place. DO NOT send them - that's all > > > > You do realize that wine would be the exception in the open source world by > banning the preferred

Hi all, While I was gone I thought a bit about the flame war a few weeks ago and some of the very unpleasant private emails some people decided to send me as a result, most of them demanding that I solve *their* particular problem for them. I wanted to get people's feel for what the policy should be for this mailing list. I have so far tried to limit it to the syslinux loader family

Hi All, At the risk of starting a major flame war and giving Java player-haters more fuel for their ire, I''ve done a performance comparison between Ruby/Odeum and Lucene: http://www.zedshaw.com/projects/ruby_odeum/performance.html Please don''t take this as a "Java sucks Ruby rulez" posting, or that I''ve done any sort of scientific analysis here.

On 10/10/2017 11:03 AM, Andrew Holway wrote: > Hiya everyone, > > Is there a way to disable a thread that has degenerated into flaming? The > recent "discussion" on /var/run descended into some quite nasty places and > perhaps a lid should have been put on it. This seems to happen every few > weeks and is somewhat embarrassing when I'm trying to persuade people of

[Vorbis] Extension proposal - partly serious) In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0406201942590.21207-100000@sasami.anime.net> References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0406201942590.21207-100000@sasami.anime.net> Message-ID: <40D70E0E.5090807@ellisfoundation.com> >Anyone else want to take this discussion to another mailing list? We can >hash out a standard there without interference from the

Dear All, Thanks for all your replied but still I don't know how to install from 1.0.7 to 1.2.14. What should I consider to keep the same configuration during or after upgrade? It is the first time I am trying to upgrade my Dovecot. Thank a lot for your help --- On Fri, 1/10/10, dovecot-request at dovecot.org <dovecot-request at dovecot.org> wrote: From: dovecot-request at

On 05/26/2016 08:45 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 5:17 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 05/26/2016 04:31 AM, Yamaban wrote: >>> On Thu, 26 May 2016 08:00, James Hogarth wrote: >>>> On 26 May 2016 00:57, "SternData" wrote: >>>>> On 05/25/2016 06:43 PM, Always Learning wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 2016-05-25 at

On 15 December 2017 at 13:24, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > Dear Experts, > > After one of updates that was released some time ago (a Month ago or maybe > even earlier) I have noticed the following. On the machines with default > runlevel 5 (sorry about old terminology, the new one is still confusing > for me ;-) GUI/X11 login (display manager)

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13517 Is Wine going to have to lose even more experienced users over a stupid bug? Does WineHQ really value new users over those who have the knowledge and are willing to help? Let's move towards resolution on this and consolidate on Google Groups already, before it's too late. -- Paul Johnson baloo at ursine.ca -------------- next part

On Thu, May 26, 2016 9:30 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 05/26/2016 08:45 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 26, 2016 5:17 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 05/26/2016 04:31 AM, Yamaban wrote: >>>> On Thu, 26 May 2016 08:00, James Hogarth wrote: >>>>> On 26 May 2016 00:57, "SternData" wrote: >>>>>> On 05/25/2016

I hate to have started this, especially the "sister" thread that has dissented into a flame war of what is OSS. Let me say that I believe there is nothing wrong trying to make money on ones efforts. Actually it is a must. How can anyone continue to put efforts into a project when there is no reward? Especially when most of the effort is by a single individual. Secondly there comes a

Hi all, First off - this is not flame bait or a troll. It's a genuine question. Since the forum gateway was introduced, it is my opinion that this list is getting flooded with newbie questions. Check the "I just installed Ubuntu" thread for a typical example. I wish to silently remove all wine-forum posts and their replies from my inbox. I plan to filter based on From:

Some people on mailing list (most notably Paul Johnson)don't get that forum works different. Please block their replies or remove them completely from the ML and forum.

Dear All, Is there any easy way to upgrade Dovecot like yum command? Or I have to delete the current and install the new version then change the setting?> I will appreciate if you can tell me the steps please? Best Regards Arif --- On Fri, 1/10/10, dovecot-request at dovecot.org <dovecot-request at dovecot.org> wrote: From: dovecot-request at dovecot.org <dovecot-request at

OK guys and gals ... can we please stop all the fighting? When technical questions are asked, they should be answered. I lot of people on this list have something that a lot of newbies need ... experience. So answering a question with "RTFM" or "JFGI" is not going to impart any of your experience ... which is one of the things they need and want. Also ... if someone attacks

Hello, I made some statistics and comparisons about security advisories published by three popular RHEL 6 clones: CentOS 6, Oracle Linux 6 and Scientific Linux 6. The article is available at the following URL: http://bitrate.epipe.com/rhel-vs-centos-scientific-oracle-linux-6_187 I hope you find it interesting. Looks like CentOS has been doing quite well this year in this regard. Feedback is

RPvs> The wiki (and Microsoft) is very vocal that you shouldn't use the RPvs> '.local' TLD Not to start a flame war - but Microsoft is the *source* of using .local in Active directory domains - from past practices. And, even now, they are somewhat equivocal in saying it shouldn't be used. [No source given, but it's something I've looked at in the last year and there

The bickering here about Centos 6 has made me wonder what is actually legally necessary to re-distribute the RPM files that come with RHel6. I am not starting a flame ware, I hope. I'm just curious about what is minimally necessary go from RHel6 to another distribution. I suppose we could discuss "Paul Linux 6" instead of Centos, if that makes you feel more comfortable. (and not

Hallo, Considering the relative decline of IRC (sorry folks) I have set up a Slack for Enterprise Linux. I've been using "pythondev.slack.com" and honestly, its a fantastic tool for community support with really nice features for computer centric discussion. https://enterpriselinux.slack.com/shared_invite/MTY4MTM5NjQ2NTc5LTE0OTE5OTkyNTctMjkyNGU1NWQzOA My hope is that those running